A Nation of Idiots

1. A Nation of Idiots Emerges from Blind Following

A nation of idiots is like any other nation within our country; a nation of thinkers, speakers, farmers, preachers, travellers, drivers, riders, walkers, kneelers, writers, traders, teachers, doctors, dopers, painters, miners, leaders; but it is not easily visible.

Invisible collective. The "nation of idiots" isn't a distinct group but a collective mindset that influences lives negatively, often unseen until its effects manifest. Demonetisation served as a stark example, revealing how widespread panic and attempts to game the system led people to act irrationally, prioritizing personal gain over collective well-being or helping the needy. The government's strategy seemed to be about out-thinking those who would blindly follow opportunities to exploit loopholes.

Gaming the system. During demonetisation, people engaged in various schemes to convert black money or avoid perceived losses, often based on rumors rather than facts. Examples included:

• Buying gold at inflated prices.
• Using dummy bank accounts.
• Bulk-buying train tickets for future refunds.
• Laundering money through religious institutions.
• Searching online for ways to convert black money.

Ignoring the needy. While many focused on protecting their own cash, the crisis highlighted a lack of empathy for those most affected, such as the poor unable to access funds or pay for essentials. The author notes the irony of people bragging about their schemes while ignoring the suffering around them, demonstrating how this collective idiocy leads to a failure as a country during times of crisis.

2. The Ideal Indian Man is Molded for Conformity

He must believe and not question.

Shaped by society. The journey to becoming an "ideal Indian man" involves strict adherence to societal expectations and traditions, often without understanding their basis. Conformity is paramount, starting from childhood where names and identities are often chosen or changed based on external factors and perceived social acceptance, rather than personal meaning. This early conditioning discourages questioning and encourages fitting into predefined boxes.

Irrational beliefs. This conformity extends to adopting irrational beliefs and practices, particularly concerning religion and tradition, often defended with illogical arguments ("Good Bacteria Defence"). The author's childhood anecdotes, like the feet-washing ritual or the instruction to hate Pakistan, illustrate how unquestioning acceptance of absurd customs is ingrained from a young age, prioritizing adherence over understanding or critical thought.

Blaming external factors. When faced with criticism for societal issues like sexism, the "ideal Indian man" often deflects blame onto external factors like Bollywood films. However, the author argues that these films merely reflect pre-existing societal biases, citing historical examples where women were marginalized long before cinema existed. The core issue is a reluctance to question the oppressive aspects of culture and tradition that limit freedom and perpetuate inequality.

3. Women Experience a Divided and Deplorable Reality

Women experience our country quite differently than men.

Differing realities. Indian women navigate a complex landscape shaped by tradition, modernity, and societal expectations, often experiencing the country vastly differently from men. While some may be shielded by privilege or location (like the Mumbai "bubble"), others face severe issues like sex-selective abortions, dowry demands, and constant social reminders about their roles (the "social clockwork"). This creates disconnected "societies" where women may not fully grasp the struggles of others.

Dowry and oppression. Dowry, described as a "respectable family crime," persists across socio-economic strata, often tied to perceived achievement (like becoming a civil servant). The author highlights the disturbing trend of increased dowry deaths despite rising literacy, suggesting awareness doesn't always translate to ethical behavior. This practice, along with others, underscores how women are often treated as commodities or burdens within the family structure.

Sexual vulnerability. The "deplorable" state stems from widespread sexual harassment and assault, often downplayed by terms like "eve-teasing." News media exacerbates the problem by focusing on sensational angles (religious, communal) rather than the victims, treating sexual crimes as fodder for ratings. The author suggests this indifference is rooted in a societal structure where men are defended while women require protection, and even consensual acts can be weaponized, revealing a deep-seated issue with how sexuality and gender are perceived and controlled.

4. We Are Raising Followers, Not Questioners

We prefer to bring up followers.

Reflection of parents. In India, a child's behavior and choices are often seen as a direct reflection of their parents' upbringing, leading to intense pressure to conform. From early milestones to career choices and marriage, children are constantly evaluated against societal norms, with their "report cards" validating or critiquing parenting styles. This focus on external validation stifles individuality and encourages adherence to predefined paths.

Limited choices. From birth, individuals are categorized by name, caste, and community, severely limiting their choices in relationships, business, and even where they can live. The "No-No List" dictates who one can love or marry, enforced by family pressure and emotional manipulation. This system prioritizes maintaining traditional alliances and social structures over individual happiness or exploration.

Discouraging inquiry. The author contrasts the natural curiosity and defiance of children with the adult tendency to stop questioning and simply accept societal norms. The anecdote about questioning Gandhi's birthplace and Gujarat's dry state status highlights how even simple inquiries can be met with resistance. This conditioning to "listen and understand" rather than "question" results in a population that follows blindly, perpetuating outdated and often harmful practices without critical examination.

5. Inheriting Ideas and Questioning Outdated Traditions

At what point is a generation free?

Ideas shape behavior. Beyond monetary inheritance, we inherit ideas, values, and customs from previous generations, which profoundly shape our behavior. The author contrasts this with animals, who don't carry forward historical grievances or complex social protocols. While inheriting ideas can be powerful (like Gandhi inheriting Tolstoy's non-violence), blindly following outdated or harmful traditions can be detrimental.

Outdated entitlements. The "daughter-in-loss" anecdote illustrates how inherited ideas, like the expectation of receiving a household allowance from in-laws, can become entitlements even when the context has changed (e.g., the woman is also earning). This shows a failure to re-examine whether inherited practices still fit modern realities, clinging to symbols of past dependence as rights.

Blind adherence. Customs like the "cover" at weddings, where the bride's family gifts money to the groom's side, are followed rigidly despite being unfair and illogical. Questioning these traditions, even politely, is met with resistance and offense, highlighting a deep-seated reluctance to examine the validity of long-standing practices. The author argues that this unwillingness to question, even when traditions cause misery or conflict (like the dueling pundits), prevents progress and keeps society stuck in outdated ways.

6. India's Regression on Sex and Sexuality

How did we go from a secular, sexual and spiritual state, to a country where the most significant sex symbol is an item song navel?

From open to repressed. India has undergone a significant regression in its approach to sex and sexuality, moving from the open depiction in ancient texts (Kamasutra) and public structures (Khajuraho temples) to a state of widespread repression and discomfort. The author notes the irony of temples featuring erotic art while modern society veils women and shuns public discussion of sex.

Religion and control. Sexuality has become heavily intertwined with religion, often used to control and demonize natural human behavior. Practices like arranged marriage are framed as religious duties, while premarital sex is taboo. The legal system's fluctuating stance on homosexuality (recriminalizing, then decriminalizing) reflects this societal confusion and discomfort, showing how personal matters are subjected to external moral policing and legal uncertainty.

Misunderstanding and power. The author suggests that those in positions of power, often older and potentially out of touch with modern understanding of sexuality, contribute to this repression. Their inability to grasp basic concepts related to sex is reflected in euphemisms ("gupt rog") and harmful policies. This lack of understanding, combined with the desire to control, perpetuates a "sexual depression" where natural expression is stifled and penalized.

7. Politics and Religion: A Disastrous Mix for Distraction

The only thing common between the two is how much is written about them and how little is understood, apart from the level of detail in their public structures.

Exploiting faith. Mixing politics and religion is consistently disastrous, yet politicians repeatedly exploit faith for gain. Religion provides a "bell" – a code of life – but politics adds disruptive "claps," turning peaceful coexistence into confrontation and conflict ("Your God vs. My God"). This manipulation is easy because people are deeply attached to their religious identities and easily incited against others.

Manufactured crises. Politicians use manufactured crises and distractions, often centered around religious or communal issues, to divert public attention from their self-serving actions. The "Distraction as an Opportunity" example details how political parties united to pass a law legalizing anonymous foreign funding dating back decades, effectively whitening black money, while the public was focused on a court verdict and staged protests.

Financial gain over unity. Despite inciting communal division among citizens, political parties across the spectrum unite when it comes to financial gain. The amendment to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, passed without debate while the country was distracted, allowed unlimited, untraceable foreign funds into political accounts. This demonstrates that their true allegiance is to wealth and power, using religion and other divides merely as tools to keep the populace fighting amongst themselves while they consolidate control and wealth.

8. The News Machine Operates on Staged Reality (Kayfabe)

It isn’t real, you know.

Staged reality. The "news machine" is distinct from actual news; it operates on "kayfabe," presenting staged or exaggerated events as real to manipulate public perception and behavior. The Melbourne attacks story, where isolated muggings were amplified into a national crisis, illustrates how media can manufacture hysteria that doesn't reflect reality on the ground, causing real-world consequences like lost jobs and ruined plans.

Hero anchors and manipulation. News channels invest heavily in promoting "hero" anchors to build trust, making viewers believe they are watching an unbiased truth-seeker. However, these anchors often read from teleprompters and participate in staged debates ("Bollywood film"), designed to provoke reactions and boost ratings (TRP). This focus on drama and personality over factual reporting allows them to control the narrative and distract from inconvenient truths.

Profit over truth. The news machine prioritizes being first and profitable over accuracy or integrity. By focusing on sensational angles and manufacturing chaos, they keep viewers engaged and distracted. The author reveals that many news channels are owned by politicians or their associates, explaining why they serve political agendas and propagate propaganda rather than holding power accountable. The consequence is a public misinformed and easily manipulated, reacting to staged events rather than addressing real issues.

Last updated: May 2, 2025