Key Takeaways
1. Trauma Shatters Fundamental Assumptions About Safety and Control
I was attacked for no reason. I had ventured outside the human community, landed beyond the moral universe, beyond the realm of predictable events and comprehensible actions, and I didn’t know how to get back.
Worldview Disrupted. Trauma, especially human-inflicted violence, shatters the fundamental belief that the world is a safe and predictable place. This loss of a sense of security can lead to a profound disorientation, making it difficult to navigate daily life. The victim's sense of control over their own life is also severely undermined, leading to feelings of helplessness and vulnerability.
Loss of Predictability:
- The world no longer feels predictable or safe.
- Everyday activities become fraught with anxiety.
- The future seems uncertain and threatening.
Examples of shattered assumptions:
- A walk in a peaceful area becomes a source of terror.
- Trust in others is replaced by suspicion and fear.
- The belief in personal safety is replaced by a sense of constant vulnerability.
This disruption of basic assumptions about the world and one's place in it is a core component of the traumatic experience, making recovery a complex and challenging process.
2. The Self is Relational, Embodied, and Narratively Constructed
In this book, I attempt to explain these cryptic observations, and, in so doing, I develop and defend a view of the self as fundamentally relational—capable of being undone by violence, but also of being remade in connection with others.
Interconnected Aspects. The self is not a singular, isolated entity but rather a complex interplay of relational, embodied, and narrative elements. These aspects are interconnected and mutually constitutive, meaning that they shape and influence each other. The self is formed and sustained through relationships with others, experiences within a physical body, and the stories we tell about ourselves.
Relational Self:
- The self is formed and sustained through connections with others.
- Violence severs these connections, leading to a sense of isolation.
- Recovery requires re-establishing bonds of trust and empathy.
Embodied Self:
- The body is not merely a vessel but an integral part of the self.
- Trauma alters one's relationship with their body, often leading to feelings of betrayal or vulnerability.
- Physical sensations and memories are deeply intertwined with the experience of trauma.
Narrative Self:
- The self is constructed through the stories we tell about our lives.
- Trauma disrupts these narratives, leading to a fragmented sense of self.
- Reconstructing a coherent narrative is essential for recovery.
Understanding the self as relational, embodied, and narratively constructed provides a more holistic view of the impact of trauma and the process of healing.
3. Traumatic Memory is Bodily, Fragmented, and Intrusive
Traumatic memory is not narrative. Rather, it is experience that reoccurs, either as full sensory replay of traumatic events in dreams or flashbacks, with all things seen, heard, smelled, and felt intact, or as disconnected fragments.
Sensory Overload. Traumatic memories are not like ordinary memories; they are often experienced as vivid, sensory flashbacks that can feel as if the traumatic event is happening again. These memories are not under conscious control and can be triggered by seemingly innocuous stimuli. They are often fragmented, lacking a coherent narrative structure.
Characteristics of Traumatic Memory:
- Bodily: Stored in the body, triggering physical sensations and reactions.
- Fragmented: Lacking a clear narrative structure, often experienced as isolated images or sensations.
- Intrusive: Uncontrollable and recurring, often triggered by external cues.
Examples of Traumatic Memory:
- A sudden smell or sound can trigger a flashback to the traumatic event.
- The body may react with fear or anxiety even when there is no immediate danger.
- Sleep disturbances and nightmares are common.
The bodily, fragmented, and intrusive nature of traumatic memory makes it difficult for survivors to integrate their experiences into a coherent life narrative, highlighting the need for specialized approaches to healing.
4. Narrative is Essential for Reconstructing a Shattered Self
Piecing together a shattered self requires a process of remembering and working through in which speech and affect converge in a trauma narrative.
Reclaiming Agency. Constructing a narrative of the traumatic experience is a crucial step in the recovery process. It allows survivors to reclaim agency over their story, transforming passive experiences into active narratives. This process involves piecing together fragmented memories, giving them a temporal order, and integrating them into a coherent life story.
Functions of Narrative:
- Provides a framework for understanding the traumatic event.
- Transforms passive experiences into active narratives.
- Enables survivors to make sense of their past and envision a future.
The Power of Telling:
- The act of telling a story can transform traumatic memories.
- It allows survivors to gain control over their experiences.
- It helps to integrate the trauma into a larger life narrative.
Through the process of narrating their experiences, survivors can begin to make sense of what happened to them, regain a sense of control, and move towards healing.
5. Empathy and Bearing Witness are Crucial for Recovery
Nonetheless, the trauma survivor must find empathic listeners in order to carry on.
The Power of Connection. Recovery from trauma is not a solitary journey; it requires the presence of empathic listeners who can bear witness to the survivor's story. The act of being heard and believed is essential for reintegrating the survivor into a community and re-establishing bonds of trust.
The Role of Empathy:
- Empathic listeners provide a safe space for survivors to share their stories.
- They validate the survivor's experiences and feelings.
- They help to counteract the isolation and shame often associated with trauma.
Bearing Witness:
- Bearing witness involves actively listening and acknowledging the survivor's truth.
- It helps to transform traumatic memories into narratives that can be integrated into the survivor's sense of self.
- It reintegrates the survivor into a community, re-establishing bonds of trust and faith in others.
The presence of empathic listeners is crucial for the healing process, providing the support and validation that survivors need to move forward.
6. The Personal is Political: Violence is a Systemic Issue
This book interweaves a personal narrative of recovering from sexual violence with philosophical investigations of trauma and the nature of the self, but my primary motivation in writing it was political.
Beyond Individual Experience. Violence, particularly gender-based violence, is not merely a personal issue but a systemic problem rooted in social and political structures. Viewing violence as a private matter obscures its broader implications and perpetuates the conditions that allow it to continue.
Systemic Nature of Violence:
- Gender-based violence is a function of socially constructed gender roles.
- It is often taken for granted as natural or inevitable.
- It is reinforced by cultural norms and political structures.
The Need for Political Action:
- Addressing violence requires more than individual solutions.
- It necessitates social and cultural change.
- It demands a critical examination of power structures and gender roles.
By recognizing the political dimensions of violence, we can move beyond individual blame and towards collective action to create a more just and equitable society.
7. Recovery is Possible, but Not Linear or Predictable
I’m filled with gratitude for the new life I was forced to make, a life that feels less like something following a disastrous event and more like a new growth of grass, following one or more mowings—the original meaning of “aftermath.”
A Journey, Not a Destination. Recovery from trauma is not a linear process with a clear beginning and end. It is a complex and often unpredictable journey with periods of progress and setbacks. The goal is not to return to a pre-trauma state but to integrate the experience into a new sense of self.
Characteristics of Recovery:
- It is not a linear process; there will be ups and downs.
- It requires time, patience, and determination.
- It involves acknowledging and integrating the traumatic experience.
The Possibility of Growth:
- Trauma can lead to personal growth and resilience.
- It can provide new insights and perspectives.
- It can lead to a deeper appreciation for life and connection with others.
While the aftermath of trauma can be long and painful, recovery is possible, and it can lead to a new sense of self that is stronger and more resilient.
8. Forgetting is a Political Act; Remembering is Resistance
One of the most difficult aspects of my recovery from the assault was the seeming inability of others to remember what had happened, accompanied by their habit of exhorting me, too, to forget.
Cultural Repression. The pressure to forget traumatic events is often a political act, serving to maintain the status quo and silence marginalized voices. Cultural repression of memories of violence and victimization is a common phenomenon, making it difficult for survivors to find support and validation.
The Politics of Forgetting:
- Forgetting serves to maintain existing power structures.
- It silences the voices of victims and marginalized groups.
- It perpetuates the conditions that allow violence to continue.
Remembering as Resistance:
- Remembering and bearing witness are acts of resistance.
- They challenge the dominant narratives and expose injustice.
- They create space for healing and social change.
By resisting the pressure to forget, survivors can reclaim their stories and contribute to a more just and equitable world.
9. The Tension Between Living to Tell and Telling to Live
In chapter 6, I explore the tensions among the various functions of narrative, in particular, the tension between living to tell and telling to live, that is, between getting (and keeping) the story right in order to bear witness and being able to rewrite the story in ways that enable the survivor to go on with her life.
Conflicting Demands. There is an inherent tension between the need to accurately recount a traumatic event for the purpose of bearing witness and the need to rewrite the story in ways that enable the survivor to move forward. The former requires fidelity to the facts, while the latter may involve reinterpreting or reframing the experience.
Living to Tell:
- Focuses on accurately recounting the traumatic event.
- Prioritizes truth-telling and bearing witness.
- Aims to ensure that the event is not forgotten or denied.
Telling to Live:
- Focuses on rewriting the story in ways that enable healing.
- Prioritizes the survivor's well-being and future.
- May involve reinterpreting or reframing the experience.
Navigating this tension is a crucial part of the recovery process, requiring survivors to balance the need for truth with the need for healing and growth.
10. The Importance of Both Meaning and Molecules in Healing
We may call such things reasons to live, but reason has little to do with it. They are the embodiments of our wishes and passions, the hopes and desires that draw us into the future.
Beyond the Physical. While the physiological effects of trauma are undeniable, healing requires more than just addressing the physical symptoms. It also involves finding meaning and purpose in life, reconnecting with one's values, and cultivating hope for the future.
The Role of Meaning:
- Finding meaning helps to make sense of the traumatic experience.
- It provides a sense of purpose and direction.
- It helps to integrate the trauma into a larger life narrative.
The Role of Molecules:
- Medication can help to alleviate the physiological symptoms of trauma.
- It can create a space for psychological healing to occur.
- It is not a substitute for therapy or other forms of support.
Integration of Approaches:
- Healing requires a holistic approach that addresses both the physical and psychological aspects of trauma.
- It involves finding a balance between meaning-making and medical intervention.
- It recognizes the complex interplay between mind and body.
By acknowledging the importance of both meaning and molecules, we can create more effective and compassionate approaches to healing from trauma.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self" by Susan J. Brison about?
- Personal and Philosophical Memoir: The book is a blend of personal narrative and philosophical analysis, recounting Brison’s experience surviving a near-fatal rape and attempted murder, and her journey to reconstruct her sense of self.
- Exploration of Trauma: It examines the psychological, social, and philosophical dimensions of trauma, focusing on how violence can shatter and remake personal identity.
- First-Person Narrative as Method: Brison uses her own story to argue for the importance of first-person narratives in understanding trauma, challenging traditional philosophical approaches that favor abstraction and universality.
- Political and Social Critique: The book situates sexual violence within broader social and political contexts, critiquing the tendency to treat such violence as private or isolated rather than as a systemic, gendered issue.
Why should I read "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self" by Susan J. Brison?
- Unique Perspective: The book offers a rare combination of survivor testimony and philosophical reflection, providing insights that are both deeply personal and intellectually rigorous.
- Empathy and Understanding: It helps readers develop empathy for trauma survivors and understand the complexities of recovery, memory, and identity after violence.
- Challenging Norms: Brison challenges prevailing cultural and academic norms about how trauma is discussed, remembered, and integrated, making it essential reading for those interested in feminist theory, trauma studies, or philosophy.
- Practical and Political Relevance: The book addresses the limitations of the criminal justice system and advocates for social change, making it relevant for activists, policymakers, and anyone concerned with gender-based violence.
What are the key takeaways from "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self"?
- Trauma Shatters and Remakes the Self: Violence can fundamentally disrupt one’s sense of identity, but recovery is possible through narrative, community, and social support.
- First-Person Narratives Matter: Personal stories are crucial for understanding trauma and challenging the biases of traditional philosophy and society.
- Relational Nature of the Self: The self is not isolated but fundamentally relational, shaped and sustained by connections with others.
- Political Dimensions of Violence: Sexual violence is not a private or random event but a political issue rooted in gendered power structures and cultural norms.
How does Susan J. Brison define and use first-person narrative in "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self"?
- Epistemological Tool: Brison argues that first-person narratives provide essential knowledge about trauma that cannot be captured by abstract, impersonal analysis.
- Challenging Objectivity: She critiques the philosophical tradition that dismisses personal experience as biased, showing that all knowledge is situated and that personal stories can reveal hidden biases.
- Facilitating Empathy: First-person accounts foster empathy and understanding, making the experiences of trauma survivors accessible to others.
- Hazards and Limitations: Brison acknowledges risks, such as overgeneralization, perpetuating stereotypes, or being co-opted, but maintains that these can be managed through careful, self-aware storytelling.
What is the "remaking of a self" after trauma, according to Susan J. Brison?
- Disintegration and Reconstruction: Trauma can cause a profound disintegration of the self, leading survivors to feel as if they are no longer the same person; recovery involves piecing together a new sense of self.
- Relational and Narrative Process: The remaking of the self is achieved through relationships with empathetic others and through constructing and telling one’s story.
- Embodied and Social: Brison emphasizes that the self is both embodied (tied to physical experience) and socially constructed, and that trauma affects both dimensions.
- Ongoing, Nonlinear Journey: Recovery is not a linear process but involves setbacks, revisions, and continual renegotiation of identity.
How does "Aftermath" by Susan J. Brison connect trauma, memory, and narrative?
- Trauma Disrupts Memory: Traumatic events can sever the connection between past, present, and future, making it difficult for survivors to construct coherent life narratives.
- Narrative as Healing: Telling one’s story, especially to empathetic listeners, helps transform traumatic memories into narrative memories, integrating them into the survivor’s sense of self.
- Performative Aspect of Testimony: Brison draws on speech act theory to argue that narrating trauma is not just descriptive but transformative—it does something to the memory and the self.
- Limits of Narrative: While narrative is powerful, Brison notes that some aspects of trauma may resist integration, and that recovery may also require embodied or political action.
What is Susan J. Brison’s critique of the criminal justice system in addressing sexual violence in "Aftermath"?
- Structural and Ideological Problem: Brison argues that sexual violence is rooted in structural and ideological factors that the criminal justice system is ill-equipped to address.
- Anti-Carceral Feminism: She identifies as an anti-carceral, anti-racist feminist, critical of relying on policing and incarceration as solutions to gender-based violence.
- Victims’ and Defendants’ Rights: Brison does not see victims’ rights as opposed to defendants’ rights but questions whether criminal law can provide true justice or prevent future violence.
- Need for Social Change: She advocates for broader social and cultural change, including support for survivors and dismantling systems of oppression, rather than focusing solely on punishment.
How does "Aftermath" by Susan J. Brison address the politics of remembering and forgetting trauma?
- Cultural Pressure to Forget: Brison describes the societal tendency to urge survivors to forget trauma, which can hinder recovery and perpetuate silence around violence.
- Moral and Political Imperative to Remember: She argues that bearing witness and telling one’s story is a political act, necessary for personal healing and for challenging systemic injustice.
- Hazards of Narrative: Brison acknowledges the risks of perpetuating victimhood or instilling fear, but maintains that silence is more damaging, both individually and collectively.
- Collective vs. Individual Trauma: The book critiques the idea that sexual violence is a private matter, emphasizing its collective, political nature and the importance of public memory.
What is the concept of the "relational self" in "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self"?
- Self as Socially Dependent: Brison, drawing on feminist philosophy, argues that the self is fundamentally relational, formed and sustained through connections with others.
- Vulnerability and Resilience: The relational self is vulnerable to being undone by violence but also capable of being remade through supportive relationships and community.
- Autonomy Reconceived: Autonomy is not isolation but interdependence; true agency is possible only within a network of caring and empathetic relationships.
- Implications for Recovery: Recovery from trauma requires not just individual effort but the presence of empathetic listeners and a supportive social environment.
What are the main philosophical arguments and methodologies used in "Aftermath" by Susan J. Brison?
- Integration of Personal and Philosophical: Brison combines first-person narrative, feminist theory, cultural analysis, and philosophical argumentation to explore trauma and the self.
- Critique of Abstract Universalism: She challenges the analytic tradition’s preference for abstraction, arguing for the necessity of context, particularity, and lived experience.
- Interdisciplinary Approach: The book draws on clinical psychology, trauma studies, feminist ethics, and literary theory to provide a multifaceted understanding of violence and recovery.
- Emphasis on Practice: Brison advocates for philosophy that is informed by and responsive to real-world experiences, especially those of marginalized or traumatized individuals.
What practical advice or methods for recovery does Susan J. Brison offer in "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self"?
- Narrative Therapy: Brison emphasizes the importance of telling one’s story, both for oneself and to empathetic others, as a means of integrating traumatic memories and rebuilding the self.
- Community and Support Groups: She highlights the value of support groups and collective healing, where survivors can empathize with and learn from each other.
- Embodied Practices: Physical self-defense training and other embodied actions can help survivors regain a sense of control and agency.
- Pharmaceutical and Medical Support: Brison acknowledges the role of medical and pharmaceutical interventions (e.g., treatment for PTSD) as sometimes necessary components of recovery.
What are the best quotes from "Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self" by Susan J. Brison, and what do they mean?
- “You will never be the same. But you can be better.” – This quote, from a support group facilitator, encapsulates the book’s message that trauma irrevocably changes survivors, but that growth and new meaning are possible.
- “Piecing together a shattered self requires a process of remembering and working through in which speech and affect converge in a trauma narrative.” – Brison highlights the transformative power of narrative in healing from trauma.
- “The self is both autonomous and socially dependent, vulnerable enough to be undone by violence and yet resilient enough to be reconstructed with the help of empathic others.” – This expresses the core idea of the relational self and the dual nature of vulnerability and resilience.
- “Sexual violence is a problem of catastrophic proportions—a fact obscured by its mundanity, by its relentless occurrence, by the fact that so many of us have been victims of it.” – Brison draws attention to the normalization and invisibility of sexual violence, underscoring the need for collective awareness and action.
Review Summary
Aftermath is a powerful and deeply philosophical account of the author's experience recovering from sexual assault and attempted murder. Readers praised Brison's candid exploration of trauma, identity, and healing through narrative. Many found the book profoundly moving and insightful, appreciating its feminist perspective and academic rigor. Some noted issues with gender essentialism and limited scope. Overall, reviewers considered it an important, thought-provoking work on trauma and recovery, recommending it widely despite its difficult subject matter.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
