Key Takeaways
1. Conflicting Evidence Obscures the Truth
What you believe happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963, depends on what evidence you believe.
Conflicting accounts. The Kennedy assassination is shrouded in conflicting evidence, making it difficult to discern the truth. Eyewitness testimonies, medical reports, and official investigations often contradict each other, leading to multiple interpretations of the events.
Credibility assessment. The legal system's approach to conflicting evidence is to determine which evidence is credible, rather than seeking new information. This approach can be limiting, as it relies on subjective judgments and may overlook crucial details.
The "best evidence" fallacy. Lawyers often prioritize "best evidence," but this can be misleading. The most readily available or officially sanctioned evidence may not always be the most accurate or truthful. A thorough investigation requires considering all evidence, even if it challenges the established narrative.
2. The Zapruder Film: A Tangible Anomaly
Lane then quoted another “official” explanation—this one published in Life magazine—which stated that, although the car had already passed the building, the President had turned around to wave to someone in the crowd, thus exposing the front of his neck toward the rear. But the Life issue which carried this explanation also published frames from the Zapruder film, and they demonstrated that during the entire assassination the President was facing forward.
A home movie's impact. The Zapruder film, a home movie capturing the assassination, presents a tangible anomaly. Its depiction of the shooting contradicts the official findings, particularly the backward thrust of President Kennedy's head following the fatal shot.
Challenging the narrative. The film's existence raises questions about the accuracy and completeness of the official investigation. Why did the Warren Commission downplay or ignore the film's implications?
Accessibility and interpretation. The Zapruder film, once available only to scholars, has become widely accessible, allowing a new generation to analyze its contents. However, interpreting the film remains a challenge, as it requires careful consideration of perspective, motion, and potential alterations.
3. Medical Testimony: A Battleground of Contradictions
Every day, in courtrooms, juries are confronted with conflicting evidence.
Dallas vs. Bethesda. The medical evidence surrounding the Kennedy assassination is a battleground of contradictions. Doctors at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas initially believed the President was shot from the front, while the Bethesda autopsy concluded he was struck from behind.
The throat wound controversy. The nature of the throat wound, whether it was an entrance or exit, became a central point of contention. The Warren Commission's conclusion that it was an exit wound contradicted early news reports and raised suspicions of a cover-up.
Burning the evidence. The revelation that autopsy documents had been burned by Dr. James Humes, the physician who performed the autopsy, further fueled the controversy. The lack of questioning about this act by the Warren Commission added to the mystery.
4. The Autopsy: Authority vs. Authenticity
Best Evidence is a story of my journey in search of the truth about the autopsy.
The autopsy's centrality. The autopsy findings on President Kennedy's body are the centerpiece of the Warren Commission's evidence. They establish the basic architecture of the shooting and support the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald was the assassin.
Impeaching the findings. If the autopsy findings are invalid or falsified, the entire narrative of the assassination is called into question. Impeaching those findings becomes crucial for uncovering the truth.
Authority vs. authenticity. The book delves into the process by which individuals and society decide what is true and false. It explores the conflict between official authority and the search for authentic evidence, particularly in the context of the autopsy.
5. Trajectory Reversal: A Blueprint for Deception
Trajectory Reversal: Blueprint for Deception
The laws of physics. The backward motion of President Kennedy's head in the Zapruder film challenges the official narrative that he was shot from behind. This "head snap" suggests a force impacting from the front, contradicting the Warren Commission's conclusions.
Altering the body. To reconcile the head snap with the official narrative, the conspirators may have altered the President's body to create the appearance of shots from behind. This alteration could have involved creating a false entry wound and manipulating the trajectory of the bullets.
Disguise and deception. The autopsy report and related evidence may serve as a disguise behind which the conspirators hide. The story of how these findings were falsified transcends the issue of the number and location of the shooters.
6. The Power of Suggestion: Shaping Perceptions
What people could “see” was not only a function of what was there, but of what they could accept.
Subjectivity of perception. Photographic enlargements and other forms of evidence are subject to interpretation. What people "see" is influenced by their existing beliefs and biases.
The grassy knoll effect. People who disagree with the Warren Commission's conclusions are more likely to "see" evidence of a grassy knoll assassin. This highlights the power of suggestion and the difficulty of achieving objectivity.
The disguise. The autopsy report and related evidence may serve as a disguise behind which the conspirators hide. The story of how these findings were falsified transcends the issue of the number and location of the shooters.
7. The Lake County Informant: A Glimmer of Hope
You have found new evidence!
A new lead. A Lake County informant's account of head surgery on President Kennedy's body offers a glimmer of hope in the search for truth. This new evidence suggests that someone altered the President's body prior to the autopsy.
The Sibert and O'Neill report. The informant's account is supported by an FBI report from agents Sibert and O'Neill, which mentions "surgery of the head area" on President Kennedy's body. This report, overlooked by the Warren Commission, provides further evidence of a cover-up.
Reopening the inquiry. The new evidence and the FBI report raise questions about the validity of the Warren Commission's conclusions. They suggest the need for a reopening of the inquiry to investigate the possibility of body alteration.
8. The Liebeler Memorandum: A Call to Action
You have written a book about authority.
A confrontation with authority. The author's confrontation with Wesley Liebeler, a former Warren Commission attorney, marks a turning point in his investigation. It leads to a deeper understanding of the process by which we decide what is true and false.
The Liebeler memorandum. Liebeler's memorandum to Chief Justice Warren, which highlights the discrepancies in the medical evidence, represents a call to action. It urges a responsible analysis of the autopsy photographs and X-rays to determine the accuracy of the Sibert and O'Neill report.
A personal narrative. The book transforms from an abstract evidentiary analysis into a personal narrative. The story of the author's journey and experiences becomes just as important as the evidence he has found and the theory he is propounding.
9. The Missing Brain: A Haunting Absence
The answer to that, I am convinced, will cast a bright light on the most important question of all: who was behind the assassination?
The brain as evidence. The President's brain, a crucial piece of evidence, is missing from the National Archives. This absence raises questions about the integrity of the investigation and the possibility of a cover-up.
The chain of possession. The chain of possession of the brain is unclear. The autopsy report mentions the brain, but its whereabouts after the autopsy remain a mystery.
A call for accountability. The missing brain highlights the need for accountability and transparency in the investigation of the Kennedy assassination. It underscores the importance of pursuing the many serious issues of autopsy forgery raised in the book.
10. The Clandestine Intermission Hypothesis: A Chilling Revelation
The Clandestine Intermission Hypothesis
A secret operation. The author formulates the "Clandestine Intermission Hypothesis," which suggests that the President's body was secretly removed from the Dallas casket and altered before the autopsy. This hypothesis accounts for the discrepancies in the medical evidence and the missing brain.
The missing link. The chain of possession of the President's body is the missing link in the Kennedy assassination investigation. Understanding what happened to the body between Dallas and Bethesda is crucial for uncovering the truth.
A synthesis of evidence. The Clandestine Intermission Hypothesis synthesizes the various pieces of evidence, including the head snap, the grassy knoll witnesses, and the conflicting medical reports. It provides a framework for understanding the assassination as a covert operation.
11. The Secret Service: Custodians of Truth or Architects of Deceit?
Best Evidence is the story of my journey in search of the truth about the autopsy.
The Secret Service's role. The Secret Service, responsible for protecting the President, played a significant role in the events surrounding the assassination. They had custody of the body, the clothing, and the limousine.
A web of inconsistencies. The Secret Service's actions and statements are marked by inconsistencies. Their reports are often vague or contradictory, and they have been accused of withholding information.
A question of trust. The Secret Service's involvement raises questions about their role in the assassination. Were they merely custodians of the truth, or were they architects of deceit? The answer to that question may hold the key to unlocking the secrets of the Kennedy assassination.
Last updated:
FAQ
What’s Best Evidence by David S. Lifton about?
- JFK Assassination Investigation: The book investigates the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, focusing on the medical, forensic, and legal evidence surrounding his death.
- Challenging the Official Narrative: Lifton scrutinizes the Warren Commission’s findings, highlighting discrepancies in autopsy reports, eyewitness accounts, and physical evidence.
- Body Alteration Hypothesis: Central to the book is the theory that Kennedy’s body was surgically altered before the official autopsy to manipulate evidence and support the lone gunman theory.
- Comprehensive Evidence Analysis: Lifton uses interviews, documents, and photographic material to build a detailed case for a cover-up and conspiracy at the highest levels.
Why should I read Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Uncovers Overlooked Evidence: The book reveals hidden or suppressed details about the JFK autopsy and the handling of the President’s body, challenging readers to reconsider the official story.
- Meticulous Investigative Approach: Lifton’s research includes interviews with key witnesses, analysis of medical and legal documents, and a critical look at forensic evidence.
- Insight into Government Secrecy: The narrative exposes how evidence can be manipulated or concealed in high-profile cases, offering lessons on transparency and accountability.
- Engaging True-Crime Narrative: The book reads like a medical thriller, making complex forensic and political issues accessible and compelling.
What are the key takeaways of Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Evidence of Body Alteration: Lifton presents strong evidence that Kennedy’s body was altered before the official autopsy, including surgical changes to wounds and removal of bullets.
- Discrepancies in Medical Testimony: There are major differences between the observations of Dallas doctors and the Bethesda autopsy team, especially regarding wound locations and trajectories.
- Chain of Custody Issues: The book documents gaps and irregularities in the chain of possession of the body and autopsy materials, undermining the credibility of the official findings.
- Implications for History and Justice: These findings suggest a deliberate cover-up, with profound consequences for American history and trust in government institutions.
What is the “body alteration hypothesis” in Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Surgical Manipulation of Evidence: Lifton hypothesizes that Kennedy’s body was surgically altered between Dallas and the Bethesda autopsy, including the removal and reassembly of skull fragments and possible removal of bullets.
- Purpose of Alteration: The alterations aimed to reverse bullet trajectories and fabricate evidence supporting the lone gunman theory, implicating Lee Harvey Oswald.
- Supported by FBI Reports: The Sibert and O’Neill FBI report mentions “surgery of the head area” before the autopsy, a fact suppressed in official records.
- Explains Medical Discrepancies: This theory accounts for the conflicting wound descriptions and medical observations between Dallas and Bethesda.
How does Best Evidence by David S. Lifton challenge the Warren Commission’s findings?
- Ignored or Suppressed Evidence: Lifton shows that critical evidence, such as the FBI report on head surgery and discrepancies in wound descriptions, was ignored or suppressed by the Commission.
- Conflicting Medical Testimony: The book highlights major differences between Dallas doctors’ initial observations and the Bethesda autopsy, especially about wound locations and trajectories.
- Chain of Possession Failures: The Warren Commission failed to establish a clear chain of custody for Kennedy’s body, raising questions about the authenticity of the autopsy findings.
- Implications of a Cover-Up: Lifton concludes that the official story is a “disguise” hiding a conspiracy to falsify evidence and mislead the public.
What is the “chain of possession” and why is it important in Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Definition and Legal Importance: The “chain of possession” refers to the documented custody of evidence from the crime scene to the courtroom, ensuring its integrity and admissibility.
- Failure in JFK Case: Lifton points out that the chain of possession for Kennedy’s body was broken, with confusion over ambulances and caskets at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
- Opportunity for Tampering: This gap provided an opportunity for unauthorized access and possible alteration of the body before the official autopsy.
- Legal Consequences: Without a verified chain of possession, the autopsy report and related evidence lose their legal pedigree, undermining the prosecution of Oswald and the official narrative.
What is the “clandestine intermission hypothesis” in Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Two Separate Coffin Entries: Lifton theorizes that Kennedy’s body was brought into the Bethesda morgue twice—first in a plain shipping casket, then later in the Dallas ceremonial casket.
- Secret Period for Alteration: During a brief period when most personnel were asked to leave the autopsy room, the body was allegedly altered and then reintroduced for the official autopsy.
- Explains Witness Discrepancies: This hypothesis accounts for conflicting eyewitness accounts about the casket and the body’s condition.
- Supports Cover-Up Theory: The clandestine intermission is central to Lifton’s argument that the autopsy was staged to fabricate evidence.
How does Best Evidence by David S. Lifton analyze the discrepancies between Dallas and Bethesda medical observations?
- Two “Lenses” Metaphor: Lifton describes the Dallas and Bethesda observations as two lenses—Dallas doctors saw wounds indicating shots from the front, while Bethesda findings indicated shots from behind.
- Body Alteration as Explanation: The discrepancies are explained by the hypothesis that the body was altered between Dallas and Bethesda, with wounds manipulated to support the official story.
- Photographic and X-ray Evidence: Autopsy photographs and X-rays, taken after the alleged alterations, show wounds consistent with the Bethesda findings but not with the Dallas observations.
- Undermines Official Credibility: These conflicting observations suggest a deliberate effort to mislead investigators and the public.
What is the significance of the Sibert and O’Neill FBI report in Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Firsthand Observations: FBI agents Sibert and O’Neill attended the Bethesda autopsy and reported “surgery of the head area” was apparent before the autopsy began.
- Contradicts Official Autopsy: Their report describes the back wound as “low” and states the bullet did not transit Kennedy’s body, contradicting the official “high” neck wound and single-bullet theory.
- Suppressed Evidence: The report was not included in the Warren Commission’s 26 volumes and was downplayed or ignored in official investigations.
- Supports Body Alteration Theory: This report is a cornerstone of Lifton’s argument that evidence was altered or suppressed to fit the lone gunman narrative.
How does Best Evidence by David S. Lifton address the authenticity of autopsy photographs and X-rays?
- Conflicting Wound Locations: Lifton identifies three records of the fatal shot—Dallas doctors, Bethesda autopsy report, and Bethesda X-rays/photos—each showing different wound locations and trajectories.
- Evidence of Tampering: The book documents changed receipts for autopsy photos and X-rays, missing photographs, and the mysterious destruction of some autopsy notes.
- Harper Fragment Contradiction: The Harper Fragment, a piece of occipital bone found in Dealey Plaza, conflicts with the autopsy photos, suggesting the photos may not be authentic.
- Implications for Official Record: These issues raise serious doubts about the integrity and authenticity of the photographic and X-ray evidence.
What is the significance of “bullet 399” in Best Evidence by David S. Lifton?
- Pristine Condition: The bullet found on a hospital stretcher (Commission Exhibit 399) was nearly intact, with no blood or tissue, which is unusual for a bullet that allegedly passed through two bodies.
- Disputed Chain of Custody: There are inconsistencies in the official accounts and receipts regarding the bullet’s discovery and handling.
- Challenges Single-Bullet Theory: Doctors testified that such a bullet could not have caused the extensive wounds to Governor Connally and remained undamaged.
- Supports Evidence Manipulation: Lifton suggests the bullet may have been planted to support the lone assassin theory, as its condition contradicts the physical evidence.
What are the best quotes from Best Evidence by David S. Lifton and what do they mean?
- "The body was altered": This central assertion encapsulates Lifton’s thesis that the President’s corpse was secretly changed to hide the true nature of the assassination.
- "The clandestine intermission hypothesis": Refers to the secret period when the body was allegedly switched or altered, explaining the presence of two caskets and conflicting witness accounts.
- "Pattern One and Pattern Two": Lifton describes two sets of evidence—official autopsy data and Dallas medical observations plus conspiracy evidence—highlighting the deliberate creation of a false narrative.
- "The proper way to view the assassination was as a covert operation": This quote summarizes the book’s conclusion that the assassination and subsequent cover-up were orchestrated by insiders to disguise political motives and protect conspirators.
Review Summary
Best Evidence by David S. Lifton is a controversial book about the JFK assassination that focuses on discrepancies in the medical evidence. Many readers praise Lifton's meticulous research and find his theory of body alteration compelling, though some dismiss it as far-fetched. The book is seen as eye-opening by those skeptical of the official narrative, but criticized by others as promoting baseless conspiracy theories. Readers appreciate Lifton's detailed examination of the evidence, even if they don't fully accept his conclusions. The book is considered a must-read for those interested in the assassination, though its length and technical detail can be challenging.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
