Key Takeaways
1. Alaska's Immense and Untamed Scale
This was, in all likelihood, the most isolated wilderness I would ever see, and that is how we got there.
Vast, trackless landscape. Alaska encompasses 375 million acres, a scale so immense it dwarfs the contiguous United States and defies easy comprehension. Much of this land remains roadless and undeveloped, accessible only by air or river, emphasizing its profound isolation. Journeys through mountains and forests are akin to traversing a continent in earlier centuries.
Nature's raw power. The wilderness is characterized by powerful rivers, rugged mountains, and extreme climates, demanding respect and adaptation from those who enter. Encounters with wildlife, unpredictable weather, and challenging terrain are constant reminders of human insignificance in this environment. The sheer physical presence of the land dominates everything.
Beyond imagination. The scale and wildness are difficult for outsiders to grasp, often reduced to myths or stereotypes. Experiencing it requires direct engagement, as civilized imagination struggles to encompass such quantities of untouched land. It is a place where valleys and mountains are often without names, preserving a sense of the unexplored.
2. Conflicting Visions for Land Use
The question now is, what is to be the fate of all this land?
Clash of interests. Alaska is a battleground for competing visions: preservationists seeking to protect vast wilderness areas and developers aiming to exploit its rich natural resources. This tension, amplified by recent events like the oil pipeline, drives significant political and social conflict across the state. The debate centers on who should decide the future of this immense public domain.
Development vs. preservation. Advocates for development see Alaska's destiny in extracting oil, minerals, and timber to fuel the national economy and state growth. Conservationists argue for setting aside large ecosystems as national parks, refuges, and wild rivers, viewing Alaska as the last chance to preserve major pieces of natural landscape for the future. This conflict is often framed as "Dig It Up" vs. "Save It."
Government's role debated. Federal policies, particularly the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, have attempted to balance these interests by designating lands for native ownership, state selection, and national conservation. However, this has led to disputes over land access, management, and the extent to which traditional freedoms (like building cabins or mining) should be curtailed on public lands.
3. The Harsh Reality of Bush Life
Everything I need—my food, clothes, house, heat—it’s all out there.
Self-sufficiency is paramount. Living in the Alaskan bush requires a high degree of self-reliance and a mastery of practical skills for survival. People hunt, fish, trap, build cabins, maintain equipment, and grow food, depending minimally on outside infrastructure. This lifestyle is a deliberate choice to escape the complexities and restrictions of urban society.
Constant challenges. Life is a continuous negotiation with nature, demanding resilience in the face of extreme cold, unpredictable weather, isolation, and the need to secure food and shelter. Simple tasks like getting water or wood become daily efforts, and emergencies can be life-threatening due to remoteness and lack of immediate medical help.
High cost of independence. While seeking freedom from conventional jobs and taxes, bush residents face significant economic hurdles. Equipment, supplies, and transportation are expensive, often requiring seasonal work outside the bush to fund their independent lives. The romantic ideal of living off the land is tempered by the practical need for cash and technology.
4. Urban Alaska's Disconnected Nature
Anchorage is the northern rim of Trenton, the center of Oxnard, the ocean-blind precincts of Daytona Beach.
Generic urban sprawl. Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, is portrayed as a sprawling, commercially driven place largely disconnected from the surrounding wilderness. Its rapid, unplanned growth, transient population, and focus on development make it resemble generic cities in the Lower 48 rather than reflecting its unique Alaskan setting.
Contrast with the wild. Despite being surrounded by mountains and water, Anchorage's built environment often ignores or obscures the natural landscape. Its streets, buildings, and commercial strips prioritize convenience and speculation over integration with the environment, creating a stark contrast with the vast, untouched land just beyond its borders.
A necessary hub. While criticized for its lack of Alaskan character, Anchorage serves as the vital logistical and economic hub for much of the state. It is the primary point of entry, a center for government agencies, and the base for many operations, including those related to resource development and wilderness management, creating an ironic situation for those who live there to be close to the wild.
5. Government Policies Reshape Alaska
The federal government should now, therefore, yield all the lands of Alaska to the state.
Shifting control. Historically, Alaskan land was almost entirely federal, with minimal private ownership. The Statehood Act promised a large land transfer to the state, but subsequent federal actions, particularly the Native Claims Settlement Act, significantly altered land ownership and access patterns. This has led to ongoing disputes over jurisdiction and control.
Impact of settlement act. The 1971 Native Claims Settlement Act, while compensating natives with land and money, also designated vast areas for potential national parks, refuges, and forests. This process of dividing and classifying land has restricted traditional uses for both natives and non-native bush residents, creating resentment and a sense of lost freedom.
Bureaucracy vs. independence. Federal agencies like the BLM and EPA are increasingly enforcing regulations on activities like mining and cabin building on public lands. This clashes with the long-held frontier ethos of individual freedom and self-determination, leading to confrontations and a feeling among some Alaskans that they are being treated as a colony.
6. Native Alaskans Navigate Change
Changes are coming too fast, and we are being pushed in different directions by forces that come from someplace outside.
Tradition under pressure. Alaskan natives, like the Hungwitchin Athapaskans, have a deep, long-standing connection to the land based on subsistence and communal use. However, they are facing rapid cultural and social changes driven by external forces, including government policies and the influx of modern technology and economy.
Settlement's mixed blessing. The Native Claims Settlement Act provided significant financial resources and land ownership, creating native corporations and integrating natives into the capitalist system. While offering new opportunities and political power, it also introduced concepts like private property and corporate structures that conflict with traditional ways and have created internal tensions and struggles.
Struggles with modernization. The transition has been challenging, marked by issues like alcoholism and a sense of cultural displacement. Natives are caught between preserving their heritage and adapting to a world that often devalues their traditional skills and outlook. They seek to maintain access to subsistence lands while navigating the complexities of modern law and economy.
7. The Enduring Allure of the Frontier
My reason for being up here is basically a guy can be an individual.
Escape from the "Outside". Many people are drawn to Alaska, particularly the bush, seeking an escape from the perceived restrictions, crowds, and materialism of the Lower 48. They desire a life of greater independence, self-reliance, and direct engagement with nature, a stark contrast to the complexities of modern urban society.
Seeking opportunity and freedom. The idea of Alaska as the "last frontier" attracts those looking for a place where individual effort and resourcefulness are paramount and where they can forge their own path. This includes traditional pursuits like mining and trapping, as well as simply living remotely, valuing space and freedom over conventional success.
Testing oneself. The challenging environment itself is a draw for some, offering a test of skills and resilience. Surviving and thriving in the bush provides a deep sense of accomplishment and connection to a more fundamental way of life, reinforcing the identity of being capable and independent.
8. Wildlife Defines the Wilderness
What mattered was not so much the bear himself as what the bear implied. He was the predominant thing in that country, and for him to be in it at all meant that there had to be more country like it in every direction and more of the same kind of country all around that.
Symbol of wildness. Animals, particularly large predators like grizzly bears and wolves, are central to the identity and experience of the Alaskan wilderness. Their presence signifies the health and extent of the untouched landscape, representing a force of nature that commands respect and dictates human behavior.
Integral to life and ecosystem. Wildlife is not just scenery; it is a vital part of the ecosystem and a crucial resource for those living in the bush. Animals like moose and caribou provide essential food, while furs from trapping offer income. The interactions between predators and prey, and between humans and animals, are fundamental aspects of life in the country.
Source of conflict and debate. Human interaction with wildlife, particularly hunting and trapping, is a point of contention between bush residents and outsiders or conservationists. Debates over wolf control, hunting regulations, and the ethics of trapping highlight differing views on how humans should relate to the natural world and its inhabitants.
9. Capital Debate Reflects Identity Crisis
The central paradox of Alaska is that it is as small as it is large—an immense landscape with so few people in it that language is stretched to call it a frontier, let alone a state.
Symbolic relocation. The debate over moving the state capital from isolated Juneau to a new site in the more populated Susitna Valley is more than a logistical issue; it symbolizes Alaska's struggle with its identity. It highlights the tension between its vast wilderness and its small, concentrated population, and the rivalry between its major cities.
Cost and practicality vs. vision. The move is fraught with practical challenges, including immense cost and the difficulty of building a functional city in a wild area. Yet, proponents are driven by a vision of a centrally located capital that better serves the majority of Alaskans and perhaps embodies a new, modern Alaskan identity, contrasting with the historical, isolated Juneau.
Political maneuvering. The debate is fueled by political rivalries, particularly between Anchorage and Fairbanks, and by differing ideas about how the state's expected oil wealth should be spent. The process of site selection becomes a microcosm of the larger conflicts over land use, development, and who holds power in Alaska.
10. Resourcefulness is Key to Survival
You adapt for summer, too. When a new plane comes into the country, people say, ‘It’s still in wheel pants,’ because wheel pants are the first things to come off.
Necessity drives innovation. Living remotely in Alaska demands exceptional resourcefulness and the ability to adapt technology and skills to the unique environment. People must be mechanics, builders, pilots, hunters, and improvisers, as professional help is often unavailable or too distant.
Mastering diverse skills. Survival depends on a wide range of practical abilities, from building and maintaining cabins and equipment (like bulldozers or airplanes) to hunting, trapping, fishing, and preserving food. This constant need to fix, build, and adapt fosters a deep understanding of how things work and a self-reliant mindset.
Adapting technology. While seeking a life away from modern civilization, bush residents often rely on technology, but they adapt it to their needs. Airplanes are modified for rough landings, vehicles are customized for off-road travel, and tools are repaired and repurposed, demonstrating a pragmatic approach to using technology to support a traditional lifestyle.
11. A Distinct Alaskan Identity Emerges
Alaska is a foreign country significantly populated with Americans.
Unique cultural blend. Alaska possesses a distinct identity shaped by its environment, history, and the diverse people drawn to it. It's a place where traditional native cultures intersect with various waves of white settlers, creating a unique social landscape that feels separate from the rest of the United States.
**
[ERROR: Incomplete response]
Last updated:
Review Summary
Coming Into the Country is widely praised as a masterful exploration of 1970s Alaska, divided into three sections covering wilderness, politics, and rural life. Readers appreciate McPhee's vivid prose, insightful character portrayals, and ability to capture Alaska's contradictions and complexities. Many consider it a definitive work on Alaska, though some found parts slow or dated. The book is frequently recommended for those interested in Alaska's history, culture, and natural beauty. Critics note McPhee's sympathetic view of rugged individualism and his detailed observations of a transitional period in Alaskan history.