Key Takeaways
1. The rise and fall of monopoly power shaped American politics and economy
"To have failed to solve the problem of producing goods would have been to continue man in his oldest and most grievous misfortune. But to fail to see that we have solved it, and to fail to proceed thence to the next tasks, would be fully as tragic."
Industrial revolution and monopolies: The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the rise of industrial monopolies in key sectors like oil, steel, and railroads. Figures like John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan amassed unprecedented wealth and power.
Political consequences: This concentration of economic power led to:
- Corruption of the political process
- Exploitation of workers and small businesses
- Growing inequality and social unrest
Cyclical nature: The book argues that the struggle between democratic forces and monopolistic tendencies has been a recurring theme in American history, with periods of reform followed by corporate resurgence.
2. Populist movements challenged corporate dominance in the early 20th century
"We find two-thirds of American industry concentrated in a few hundred corporations, and actually managed by not more than five human individuals."
Progressive Era reforms: The early 1900s saw a wave of populist and progressive movements:
- Trust-busting efforts under Theodore Roosevelt
- Wilson's "New Freedom" agenda
- Rise of labor unions and farmers' alliances
Key figures: Influential reformers included:
- Louis Brandeis, who advocated for "industrial liberty"
- Wright Patman, a champion of small businesses
- Woodrow Wilson, who implemented antitrust legislation
Ideological battle: The period was marked by a clash between those who believed in centralized corporate power (like Theodore Roosevelt) and those who advocated for decentralization and competition (like Wilson and Brandeis).
3. The New Deal era ushered in sweeping reforms to curb monopolistic practices
"The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization."
FDR's agenda: Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal sought to:
- Break up financial monopolies
- Regulate Wall Street
- Empower labor unions
- Create a social safety net
Key legislation:
- Glass-Steagall Act (separating commercial and investment banking)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (regulating financial markets)
- National Labor Relations Act (protecting workers' rights)
Ideological shift: The New Deal represented a fundamental reimagining of the role of government in the economy, challenging the laissez-faire orthodoxy of previous decades.
4. World War II mobilization reshaped industrial policy and corporate structures
"To have failed to solve the problem of producing goods would have been to continue man in his oldest and most grievous misfortune. But to fail to see that we have solved it, and to fail to proceed thence to the next tasks, would be fully as tragic."
Government-directed production: The war effort required massive coordination between government and industry, leading to:
- Creation of new industries (e.g., aerospace)
- Government ownership of key facilities
- Rapid technological innovation
Post-war reorganization: After the war, the government:
- Sold off many wartime facilities to create competition
- Continued antitrust enforcement to prevent reconcentration
- Implemented policies to support a growing middle class
Economic boom: The post-war period saw unprecedented economic growth and prosperity, seemingly validating the New Deal economic model.
5. Post-war prosperity masked underlying tensions in the economic system
"The realm of science and its application to technology is expanding at a startling pace, and its limits are beyond calculation. The advances of the future can be made to serve the common welfare by affording opportunities for initiative and enterprise. Or they can contribute increasingly to the growth of private monopoly."
Affluent Society: John Kenneth Galbraith's concept of the "Affluent Society" argued that:
- Material abundance had solved the basic economic problem
- Focus should shift to public goods and quality of life
Consensus politics: The post-war era saw a degree of political consensus around:
- Acceptance of big business, big labor, and big government
- Keynesian economic management
- Continued antitrust enforcement
Hidden problems: Despite apparent prosperity, issues remained:
- Persistent poverty in some regions
- Racial and economic inequality
- Growing corporate influence in politics
6. The Chicago School of economics laid the groundwork for neoliberal policies
"I am not as discouraged as people think I should be. I think our general attitude should be that of the Bolsheviks after 1905."
Key figures: Economists like Milton Friedman, George Stigler, and Aaron Director developed theories that:
- Challenged Keynesian economics
- Argued for minimal government intervention
- Reinterpreted antitrust laws to focus solely on "consumer welfare"
Influence on law: Legal scholars like Robert Bork applied Chicago School ideas to antitrust law, arguing for a more permissive approach to mergers and monopolies.
Growing network: The Chicago School built a network of:
- Think tanks and academic departments
- Corporate funders
- Sympathetic politicians and judges
7. Corporate power gradually reasserted itself, undermining New Deal reforms
"The sole consistency that I can find is that, in litigation under §7, the Government always wins."
Regulatory capture: Over time, regulatory agencies became increasingly influenced by the industries they were meant to oversee.
Policy shifts: Beginning in the 1970s and accelerating in the 1980s:
- Antitrust enforcement weakened
- Financial regulations were loosened
- Labor unions lost power
Ideological change: Neoliberal ideas became increasingly dominant in both major political parties, leading to:
- Deregulation
- Privatization
- Emphasis on market-based solutions
8. The battle between democracy and monopoly continues to shape modern America
"Modern European history teaches us that free enterprise cannot exist alongside of monopolies and cartels."
Renewed concentration: Recent decades have seen:
- Growth of tech giants and platform monopolies
- Increased corporate consolidation across industries
- Rising inequality and declining economic mobility
Political consequences: Concentrated economic power has led to:
- Growing influence of money in politics
- Erosion of antitrust enforcement
- Debates over the role of big tech in society
Ongoing debate: The book argues that the struggle between democratic forces and monopolistic tendencies remains a central issue in American politics and economics, with implications for:
- Economic opportunity
- Political representation
- The future of democracy itself
Last updated:
Review Summary
Goliath is a comprehensive history of monopoly power in the United States, praised for its detailed research and unique perspective. Readers appreciate Stoller's analysis of key figures and events in antitrust history, though some find the narrative one-sided. The book is lauded for its relevance to current economic issues and its critique of both political parties' roles in enabling monopolies. While some reviewers note the book's length and occasional tedium, most find it an important and thought-provoking read on the ongoing struggle between democracy and concentrated economic power.