Key Takeaways
1. The Unconscious is Structured Like a Language
‘The unconscious is structured as a language.’
Unconscious logic. Lacan reframes the unconscious not as a reservoir of irrational drives, but as a system governed by its own grammar and logic. This challenges the traditional view of the unconscious as a chaotic force needing taming. Instead, it's a site where traumatic truths find expression through a unique symbolic order.
Language and truth. The unconscious "talks" and "thinks," revealing a traumatic truth that the individual must learn to live with. This perspective shifts the focus from conquering the id to daring to approach the site of one's own truth. It's not about identifying with a deep truth, but about confronting an unbearable one.
Implications for psychoanalysis. This linguistic turn has profound implications for psychoanalysis, suggesting that the unconscious operates according to its own rules of signification. Understanding these rules is key to unlocking the secrets of the self and confronting the core of human existence.
2. The Big Other is a Virtual Symbolic Order
Is it with the gifts of Danaoi* or with the passwords that give them their salutary non-sense that language, with the law, begins?
Symbolic constitution. The "big Other" represents the symbolic order, society's unwritten constitution, which directs and controls our actions. It's the sea we swim in, an all-pervasive agency that remains ultimately impenetrable. This order is not a transcendental a priori, but is sustained by continuous collective activity.
Fragility of the Other. Despite its grounding power, the big Other is fragile and virtual, existing only insofar as subjects act as if it exists. Its status is similar to an ideological cause like Communism or Nation, actual only when individuals believe in it and act accordingly. This virtual character is why a letter always arrives at its destination, even unsent, addressed to the big Other itself.
Genesis of the Other. The symbolic order emerges from a gift, an offering that marks its content as neutral to pose as a gift. Human communication is characterized by reflexivity, with every act symbolizing the fact of communication. This is exemplified by "empty gestures," offers made or meant to be rejected, establishing social links through symbolic exchange.
3. Interpassivity: Outsourcing Our Experiences
The emotional commentary is done for you.
Passive consumption. Interpassivity is the uncanny double of interactivity, where the object itself takes from us our own passivity, enjoying the show instead of us. This is seen in phenomena like canned laughter, where the soundtrack laughs for us, relieving us of the duty to enjoy ourselves.
Examples of interpassivity. This concept extends to various aspects of modern life, such as compulsively recording movies without watching them, or prayer wheels that pray for us. Even pornography can function interpassively, where simply observing others enjoy is sufficient.
False activity. Interpassivity leads to false activity, where people act to prevent something from happening, ensuring nothing changes. This is exemplified by the obsessional neurotic who talks constantly to avoid confronting underlying tensions. The critical step against such a mode is to withdraw into passivity and refuse to participate, clearing the ground for true activity.
4. Desire is Always the Other's Desire
man’s desire is the Other’s desire, in which the de/of/ provides what grammarians call a ‘subjective determination’ – namely, that it is qua/as/ Other that man desires …
Structured by the Other. Man's desire is structured by the "decentred" big Other, the symbolic order. What we desire is predetermined by this order, even when our desires are transgressive. This is because even transgression relies on what it transgresses.
Enigmatic desire. The subject desires only insofar as it experiences the Other as desiring, as the site of an unfathomable desire. The other confronts us with the fact that we ourselves do not know what we really desire, with the enigma of our own desire. This abyssal dimension of another human being is what Lacan calls the Thing (das Ding).
Ethical domestication. Resisting the ethical domestication of the neighbor, Lacan emphasizes the monstrosity of the neighbor, applying to them the term Thing. The function of the Law is not to retain proximity to the neighbor, but to keep them at a proper distance, shielding us against the monstrosity next door.
5. Fantasy Screens Us from the Real
Whenever the membranes of the egg in which the foetus emerges on its way to becoming a new-born are broken, imagine for a moment that something flies off, and that one can do it with an egg as easily as with a man, namely the hommelette, or the lamella.
Learning to desire. Fantasy teaches us how to desire, providing a "private" formula for sexual relationships. It's not about fantasizing about what we can't have, but about understanding what we desire in the first place. This role of fantasy hinges on the deadlock in our sexuality, as there is no universal guarantee of a harmonious sexual relationship.
What am I for others? Fantasy is an answer to the question, "What do others want from me? What do they see in me? What am I for those others?" It tells us what we are for our others, providing an identity that satisfies those around us. This intersubjective character is discernible even in elementary cases, like a child fantasizing about eating a strawberry cake to please their parents.
Objectively subjective. Fantasy is not objective or subjective, but "objectively subjective," the way things actually seem to you even if they don't seem that way to you. It's the "unknown knowns," the disavowed beliefs and suppositions we are not even aware of adhering to ourselves, but which nonetheless determine our acts and feelings.
6. The Superego Demands Enjoyment
Nothing forces anyone to enjoy except the superego. The superego is the imperative of jouissance – Enjoy!
Traumatic enjoyment. Jouissance, or enjoyment, is not simple pleasure, but a violent intrusion that brings more pain than pleasure. The superego, the cruel ethical agency, bombards us with impossible demands and then mocks our failures. This equation between jouissance and superego means that to enjoy is a twisted ethical duty.
Ego-Ideal vs. Superego. Lacan distinguishes between ideal ego, Ego-Ideal, and superego. The ideal ego is the idealized self-image, the Ego-Ideal is the agency whose gaze we try to impress, and the superego is the vengeful, sadistic agency. The superego is the anti-ethical agency, the stigmatization of our ethical betrayal.
The law of desire. The only proper ethical agency is the "law of desire," which tells you to act in accord with your desire. The Ego-Ideal forces us to betray the "law of desire" by adopting the "reasonable" demands of the existing socio-symbolic order. The superego exerts its unbearable pressure upon us on behalf of our betrayal of the "law of desire."
7. God is Unconscious: Atheism's True Form
The true formula of atheism is not God is dead – even by basing the origin of the function of the father upon his murder, Freud protects the father – the true formula of atheism is God is unconscious.
Modern belief. Modern atheists think they know that God is dead, but unconsciously continue to believe in God. Modernity is characterized by the subject who presents himself as a tolerant hedonist, but whose unconscious is the site of prohibitions. What is repressed is not illicit desires, but prohibitions themselves.
Everything is prohibited. "If God doesn't exist, then everything is prohibited" means that the more you perceive yourself as an atheist, the more your unconscious is dominated by prohibitions that sabotage your enjoyment. This is because the fall of oppressive authority gives rise to new and sterner prohibitions.
Commodity fetishism. Commodity fetishism is not located in our mind, but in our social reality itself. A bourgeois subject knows very well that there is nothing magic about money, but he nevertheless acts in real life as if he believes that money is a magical thing.
8. Perversion: Instrument of the Other's Will
Strictly speaking, perversion is an inverted effect of the phantasy. It is the subject who determines himself as an object, in his encounter with the division of subjectivity …
Totalitarianism. A true Stalinist politician loves mankind, yet carries out horrible purges and executions, conceiving of himself as exculpated for what he is doing. The sadistic pervert answers the question "How can the subject be guilty when he merely realizes an objective, externally imposed, necessity?" by subjectively assuming this objective necessity.
Nazi executioners. Nazi executioners were well aware that they were doing things that brought humiliation, suffering and death to their victims. The way out of this predicament was that "instead of saying: What horrible things I did to people!, the murderers would be able to say: What horrible things I had to watch in the pursuance of my duties, how heavily the task weighed upon my shoulders!"
Religious fundamentalism. Religious fundamentalism shares the structures of a pervert, acting upon the presupposition that their acts are directly ordered and guided by divine will. The pervert claims direct access to some figure of the big Other, so that, dispelling all the ambiguity of language, he is able to act directly as the instrument of the big Other's will.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek about?
- Introduction to Lacan’s Thought: The book serves as an accessible introduction to the complex ideas of Jacques Lacan, a major figure in psychoanalysis, focusing on his key concepts and their relevance today.
- Žižek’s Interpretive Approach: Slavoj Žižek guides readers through Lacan’s writings by pairing Lacanian theory with examples from philosophy, art, popular culture, and politics.
- Contemporary Relevance: The book argues that Lacan’s psychoanalytic insights are more pertinent than ever in understanding modern subjectivity, ideology, and society.
- Practical Reading Guide: Rather than summarizing Lacan’s biography or works, Žižek demonstrates how to read Lacan by engaging directly with his texts and showing their application.
Why should I read "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek?
- Demystifies Lacan: Žižek breaks down Lacan’s notoriously difficult ideas, making them accessible to beginners and those intimidated by psychoanalytic jargon.
- Connects Theory to Culture: The book links Lacanian concepts to everyday life, politics, cinema, and literature, showing their practical and cultural significance.
- Critical Perspective: Žižek offers a critical, sometimes provocative, perspective on both Lacan and contemporary society, encouraging readers to question common assumptions.
- Foundation for Further Study: It provides a strong foundation for those interested in psychoanalysis, philosophy, or critical theory, and suggests further reading for deeper exploration.
What are the key takeaways from "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek?
- The Unconscious as Language: Lacan’s central claim is that the unconscious is structured like a language, not a reservoir of wild instincts.
- The Big Other: Human reality is shaped by the symbolic order, or “big Other,” a virtual authority that structures meaning, law, and social norms.
- Desire and Fantasy: Human desire is fundamentally shaped by the desire of the Other, and fantasy mediates our relationship to the Real and to others.
- Ideology and Enjoyment: Žižek uses Lacan to analyze how ideology works through enjoyment (jouissance), prohibitions, and the paradoxes of freedom and authority in modern life.
How does Slavoj Žižek explain Lacan’s concept of the "big Other" in "How to Read Lacan"?
- Symbolic Order: The big Other is the symbolic order—language, law, and social norms—that structures our reality and interactions.
- Virtual Authority: It is not a real person or entity, but a virtual, presupposed authority that exists only as long as people act as if it exists.
- Social Link and Guilt: The big Other is the witness or audience for our actions, shaping our sense of guilt, duty, and social belonging.
- Fragility and Paradox: Žižek emphasizes the big Other’s fragility; its power depends on collective belief, and its collapse can lead to social disintegration.
What is the difference between the Imaginary, Symbolic, and Real in Lacan’s theory, as explained in "How to Read Lacan"?
- Imaginary: The realm of images, identifications, and illusions—how we see ourselves and others, often through mirrors and fantasies.
- Symbolic: The domain of language, law, and social structures—the “big Other”—which organizes meaning and social relations.
- Real: That which resists symbolization; the traumatic, impossible kernel that cannot be fully integrated into language or fantasy.
- Interplay in Examples: Žižek uses examples like chess and cinema to illustrate how these three registers interact in everyday life and culture.
How does "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek address the concept of "empty gestures" and performativity?
- Empty Gestures Defined: An empty gesture is a symbolic act meant to be rejected, such as offering to withdraw from a promotion you’ve won, expecting the offer to be declined.
- Social Cohesion: These gestures maintain social bonds and appearances, allowing for solidarity and the smooth functioning of society.
- Performativity: Žižek links Lacan’s ideas to speech act theory, showing how declarations and symbolic acts can change reality, not just describe it.
- Breakdown and Catastrophe: When the expected rejection of an empty gesture is not performed, social order can collapse, revealing the fragility of symbolic structures.
What is "interpassivity" and how does Žižek use it to explain Lacanian ideas in "How to Read Lacan"?
- Interpassivity Defined: Interpassivity is when others (or objects) perform our emotional or symbolic acts for us—like canned laughter on TV or prayer wheels in religion.
- Displacement of Experience: Our feelings, beliefs, or duties are outsourced to others or to rituals, relieving us of direct engagement.
- Contrast with Interactivity: While modern culture celebrates interactivity, Žižek shows how interpassivity is equally prevalent and shapes our subjectivity.
- Implications for Belief: This concept explains how people can “believe” through others or rituals, maintaining social and ideological structures without personal conviction.
How does "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek explain the role of fantasy and desire in Lacanian psychoanalysis?
- Fantasy as Structure: Fantasy is not an escape from reality but the framework that structures our desires and makes reality bearable.
- Desire of the Other: Our desires are shaped by what we perceive others to desire, leading to questions like “What does the Other want from me?”
- No Sexual Relationship: Lacan’s claim that “there is no sexual relationship” means that fantasy mediates all intimate relations, preventing full, harmonious union.
- Reality as Escape: Sometimes, reality itself serves as an escape from the unbearable Real encountered in dreams or fantasies.
What is the Lacanian concept of the "Real," and how does Žižek illustrate it in "How to Read Lacan"?
- The Real as Trauma: The Real is what cannot be symbolized or fully integrated into language—often experienced as trauma or an impossible kernel.
- Examples from Culture: Žižek uses horror films (like "Alien") and literature to illustrate the Real as an indestructible, uncanny force (e.g., the “lamella”).
- Not Just External Reality: The Real is not simply the world outside language, but the internal fissures and failures within the symbolic order itself.
- Retroactive Construction: Traumatic events can become “real” only retroactively, as attempts to fill gaps in our symbolic universe.
How does "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek distinguish between the Ego-Ideal, Ideal Ego, and Superego?
- Ideal Ego: The idealized self-image, how we wish to be seen by ourselves and others (Imaginary register).
- Ego-Ideal: The internalized gaze of the big Other, the symbolic authority whose approval we seek (Symbolic register).
- Superego: The cruel, excessive agency that commands us to enjoy and punishes us for failing to do so (Real register).
- Ethical Implications: Žižek argues that true ethics lies not in obeying the Ego-Ideal or Superego, but in remaining faithful to one’s own desire.
What does Žižek mean by "God is dead, but He doesn’t know it" in "How to Read Lacan"?
- Unconscious Belief: Even when we consciously reject God or authority, our unconscious may still be structured by prohibitions and beliefs.
- Modern Atheism’s Paradox: The more we see ourselves as atheists, the more our unconscious is dominated by prohibitions, not freedoms.
- Superegoic Prohibition: The fall of explicit authority leads to new, more insidious forms of internalized, unconscious prohibition.
- Ideological Critique: Žižek uses this idea to critique both religious fundamentalism and secular permissiveness, showing how both are haunted by the unconscious.
What are the best quotes from "How to Read Lacan" by Slavoj Žižek and what do they mean?
- “The unconscious is structured as a language.” This encapsulates Lacan’s central thesis that unconscious processes follow linguistic rules, not irrational chaos.
- “Nothing forces anyone to enjoy except the superego. The superego is the imperative of jouissance – Enjoy!” This highlights the paradoxical, oppressive nature of the superego in modern society.
- “If God doesn’t exist, then nothing at all is permitted any longer.” Žižek inverts Dostoevsky’s dictum to show how the loss of authority can lead to more prohibitions, not fewer.
- “Truth has the structure of a fiction.” This suggests that our deepest truths are mediated by fantasy and symbolic structures, not direct access to reality.
- “The only thing of which one can be guilty is of having given ground relative to one’s desire.” This ethical maxim urges fidelity to one’s desire, rather than conformity to external ideals or prohibitions.
Review Summary
How to Read Lacan receives mixed reviews. Many find it an engaging introduction to Lacan's ideas through Žižek's lens, appreciating his use of pop culture references and accessible explanations. However, some criticize it for being more about Žižek's interpretation than a straightforward guide to Lacan. Readers note it's not ideal for beginners seeking a comprehensive understanding of Lacan, but rather an intriguing exploration of Lacanian concepts applied to various cultural phenomena. The book's unconventional approach and Žižek's digressions receive both praise and criticism.
Similar Books
About the Author
Other books by Slavoj Žižek
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
