Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Prius Or Pickup?

Prius Or Pickup?

How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America's Great Divide
by Marc Hetherington 2018 288 pages
3.85
100+ ratings
Listen
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Unlock listening & more!
Continue

Key Takeaways

1. Worldviews shape political affiliations and personal preferences

If you perceive the world as more dangerous, then John Wayne or Clint Eastwood—strength and fortitude—is the antidote.

Fundamental outlook: People's worldviews, shaped by their perception of danger in the world, influence not only their political affiliations but also their personal preferences. Those who see the world as more dangerous tend to gravitate towards conservative political ideologies and leaders who project strength and stability.

Pervasive influence: This worldview extends beyond politics, affecting choices in:

  • Residence: Rural vs. urban areas
  • Occupation: Traditional vs. innovative fields
  • Education: Practical vs. theoretical pursuits
  • Entertainment: Conventional vs. avant-garde
  • Consumer choices: Established brands vs. novel products

The alignment of worldviews with political parties has intensified polarization, as people increasingly see those with opposing views as fundamentally different and potentially threatening to their way of life.

2. Fixed and fluid worldviews represent opposing outlooks on life

The term "fixed" describes people who are warier of social and cultural change and hence more set in their ways, more suspicious of outsiders, and more comfortable with the familiar and predictable.

Fixed worldview: Characterized by:

  • Preference for stability and tradition
  • Suspicion of outsiders and change
  • Emphasis on hierarchy and authority
  • Strong need for cognitive closure

Fluid worldview: Characterized by:

  • Openness to new experiences and diversity
  • Embrace of social and cultural change
  • Preference for egalitarian structures
  • Comfort with ambiguity and nuance

These worldviews shape how individuals interpret information, make decisions, and interact with others. While most people fall somewhere between these extremes, the polarization of American politics has increasingly pushed people towards one end of the spectrum or the other.

3. Parenting preferences reveal deep-rooted worldviews

To understand the connection between worldview and politics, consider an anecdote shared by the MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, a former Republican congressman, in a 2013 television documentary.

Revealing questions: Four simple questions about desirable qualities in children can provide profound insights into an individual's worldview:

  1. Independence vs. respect for elders
  2. Obedience vs. self-reliance
  3. Curiosity vs. good manners
  4. Being considerate vs. being well-behaved

Implications: These preferences reflect fundamental attitudes towards:

  • Authority and hierarchy
  • Social norms and traditions
  • Exploration and risk-taking
  • Interpersonal relationships

The answers to these questions strongly correlate with political affiliations and attitudes on various issues, from immigration and foreign policy to social programs and cultural values. Understanding these connections can provide valuable insights into the roots of political divisions and potential ways to bridge them.

4. Worldview politics intensifies partisanship and polarization

Partisans today demonstrate more prejudice against members of the other party than they do against people of other races and ethnicities, despite the fact that racial prejudice remains alive and well in America.

Tribal mentality: The alignment of worldviews with political parties has led to an intensification of partisan animosity. People increasingly view members of the opposing party not just as political rivals, but as fundamentally different and potentially threatening to their way of life.

Consequences:

  • Decreased willingness to compromise
  • Increased social segregation along political lines
  • Distorted perceptions of political opponents
  • Motivated reasoning and confirmation bias
  • Erosion of shared national identity

This heightened polarization makes it increasingly difficult to find common ground on important issues and threatens the functioning of democratic institutions. It also creates a fertile environment for political extremism and demagoguery.

5. Media consumption reinforces worldview-based political divisions

Partisan Americans' gravitation toward news outlets that match their worldview has only become more striking over time.

Echo chambers: The proliferation of partisan media outlets and social media algorithms has created information ecosystems that reinforce existing worldviews and political beliefs.

Key factors:

  • Selective exposure to like-minded sources
  • Confirmation bias in information processing
  • Social reinforcement within ideological bubbles
  • Distrust of mainstream or opposing media sources

Consequences:

  • Increased polarization and partisanship
  • Decreased ability to find common ground
  • Spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories
  • Erosion of shared facts and reality

This media landscape makes it increasingly difficult for people to encounter diverse perspectives and challenge their own beliefs, further entrenching the worldview divide in politics and society.

6. Fear and uncertainty can shift political preferences toward authoritarianism

When humans are consumed by fear, their survival instincts come to the fore. Under those circumstances, high-minded principles and abstract ideals are unlikely to flourish.

Primal instincts: In times of perceived threat or uncertainty, even individuals with more fluid worldviews may become more receptive to authoritarian leaders and policies that promise safety and stability.

Factors that can trigger this shift:

  • Economic instability
  • Terrorist attacks or violent crime
  • Rapid social or cultural change
  • Perceived threats to national identity

Political implications:

  • Increased support for strong, decisive leaders
  • Willingness to sacrifice civil liberties for security
  • Heightened xenophobia and nationalism
  • Reduced tolerance for dissent or minority views

Understanding this psychological dynamic is crucial for safeguarding democratic institutions and values during times of crisis or social upheaval.

7. Worldview politics threatens democratic norms and institutions

Brazen appeals to xenophobia and fear are further undermining any sense of commonality the American people might feel.

Erosion of democratic norms: The intensification of worldview-based politics has led to increasing challenges to long-standing democratic norms and institutions.

Threatened aspects of democracy:

  • Free press and media independence
  • Judicial independence
  • Respect for minority rights
  • Peaceful transfer of power
  • Faith in democratic processes

Authoritarian tendencies: Leaders who appeal to fixed worldviews often employ tactics that undermine democratic safeguards:

  • Attacking the credibility of media and institutions
  • Scapegoating minority groups
  • Promoting conspiracy theories
  • Encouraging distrust in electoral processes

This erosion of democratic norms and institutions poses a significant threat to the long-term stability and functioning of democratic societies.

8. The worldview divide extends beyond the United States to Europe

European politics appear to be reorganizing around a worldview-based divide like the one that has fractured the political system in the United States.

Global phenomenon: The rise of worldview politics is not unique to the United States, but is also evident in many European countries.

Common themes:

  • Anti-immigration sentiment
  • Skepticism towards European integration
  • Resurgence of nationalist movements
  • Populist appeals to cultural anxiety

Case studies:

  • Brexit in the United Kingdom
  • Rise of Alternative for Germany (AfD)
  • Success of Marine Le Pen's National Front in France
  • Increasing popularity of right-wing parties in Scandinavia

Understanding the global nature of this trend is crucial for developing effective strategies to address the challenges posed by worldview politics and maintain the stability of democratic systems worldwide.

9. Bridging the worldview divide requires understanding and empathy

When politics was centrally about the size of government and how much to tax, the resulting disagreements were about the fundamentals of governing, which, frankly, most Americans care little about.

Root causes: Addressing the challenges posed by worldview politics requires a deep understanding of the psychological and social factors that drive these divisions.

Key steps:

  • Recognizing the validity of different worldviews
  • Fostering empathy and understanding across divides
  • Identifying shared values and common ground
  • Promoting diverse social interactions and experiences
  • Addressing underlying economic and social anxieties

Potential solutions:

  • Education initiatives focused on critical thinking and media literacy
  • Political reforms to reduce partisan gridlock and encourage compromise
  • Community-building efforts to bridge social and cultural divides
  • Economic policies that address inequality and insecurity

Ultimately, bridging the worldview divide will require sustained effort and commitment from individuals, communities, and institutions to rebuild trust and find common purpose in an increasingly diverse and interconnected world.

Last updated:

FAQ

1. What is Prius Or Pickup?: How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America's Great Divide by Marc Hetherington about?

  • Explores America’s divide: The book investigates the deep political and cultural divisions in the United States, focusing on how Americans’ worldviews shape their political identities and behaviors.
  • Worldview politics concept: Hetherington and Weiler argue that these divides are rooted in fundamental differences in how people perceive the world—whether as dangerous or safe to explore.
  • Beyond politics: The book shows that these worldviews influence not just political choices, but also everyday preferences like cars, music, and where people live.
  • Global context: It also draws parallels to similar political realignments in Europe, highlighting the global relevance of worldview-based divides.

2. Why should I read Prius Or Pickup? by Marc Hetherington and Jonathan Weiler?

  • Fresh perspective on polarization: The book moves beyond traditional ideological explanations, offering psychological and cultural insights into why American politics is so polarized.
  • Understanding the “why”: It helps readers grasp the underlying reasons for political and social divides, not just the surface-level issues.
  • Practical implications: The framework provided is useful for citizens, policymakers, and anyone interested in bridging divides or understanding democratic challenges.
  • Global relevance: The analysis applies to democracies worldwide, making it valuable for understanding political trends beyond the U.S.

3. What are the key takeaways from Prius Or Pickup? by Marc Hetherington and Jonathan Weiler?

  • Worldview divides drive politics: The fixed vs. fluid worldview split is central to understanding modern American partisanship and polarization.
  • Everyday life is political: These worldviews shape not only voting but also lifestyle choices, deepening social segregation.
  • Media and information reinforce divides: Partisan and social media amplify worldview differences, making compromise and understanding harder.
  • Bridging the gap is challenging: Solutions require recognizing psychological roots, fostering contact, and changing political incentives.

4. What are the “fixed” and “fluid” worldviews in Prius Or Pickup? and how do they shape American politics?

  • Fixed worldview: Characterized by wariness, preference for order, hierarchy, and tradition; aligns with Republican politics and values security and strong leadership.
  • Fluid worldview: Marked by openness, tolerance, curiosity, and a sense of safety; aligns with Democratic politics and values diversity and change.
  • Spectrum and mixed types: Most Americans fall somewhere in between, but polarization pushes people toward the extremes.
  • Political alignment: These worldviews now map closely onto party identification, explaining much of the current partisan divide.

5. How do the four parenting questions in Prius Or Pickup? reveal Americans’ worldviews?

  • The four questions: The book asks which qualities are more important for children: independence vs. respect for elders, obedience vs. self-reliance, curiosity vs. good manners, and being considerate vs. being well-behaved.
  • Measuring worldview: Answers to these questions indicate whether someone has a fixed or fluid worldview, reflecting their perception of the world as dangerous or safe.
  • Predicting politics: Parenting preferences strongly correlate with political identity, with fixed answers aligning with conservatives and fluid answers with liberals.
  • Psychological insight: These questions tap into deeper traits like fear, trust, and need for order, providing a high-definition measure of worldview.

6. How does Prius Or Pickup? explain the rise of Donald Trump and similar leaders?

  • Appeal to fixed worldview: Trump’s rhetoric and promises to restore order resonated with those who see the world as dangerous and crave strong leadership.
  • Fear and stress effects: Under threat or stress, even some fluid or mixed individuals gravitate toward authoritarian-leaning leaders.
  • Polarization and rationalization: Intense partisan loyalty led many to rationalize Trump’s extreme behavior, maintaining support despite controversies.
  • Broader trend: The book connects Trump’s rise to global patterns, where populist leaders exploit worldview divides.

7. What evidence does Marc Hetherington use in Prius Or Pickup? to support the worldview theory?

  • Parenting preference surveys: The four parenting questions have been validated across multiple surveys and countries to classify worldviews.
  • Feeling thermometer scores: Data from the American National Election Study show growing negative feelings toward the opposing party, indicating political hatred.
  • Cross-national comparisons: Surveys from Europe demonstrate similar worldview divides influencing politics, confirming the theory’s broader applicability.
  • Biopolitics research: The book references physiological studies linking fear responses to political attitudes.

8. How does Prius Or Pickup? describe the impact of media and information on worldview polarization?

  • Media fragmentation: Partisan news and social media create echo chambers, reinforcing existing beliefs and demonizing the other side.
  • Asymmetric media diets: Conservatives tend to consume more partisan media, making them more susceptible to misinformation, while liberals have a more diverse media diet.
  • Motivated reasoning: Exposure to partisan media increases the tendency to interpret facts in ways that fit one’s worldview.
  • Secondhand effects: Even those not directly consuming partisan media are influenced through social networks, spreading polarization.

9. How do worldview differences in Prius Or Pickup? affect Americans’ everyday life choices and social interactions?

  • Residential sorting: Fixed individuals prefer homogenous, suburban or rural areas, while fluid individuals gravitate toward diverse, urban environments.
  • Occupational and educational choices: Fixed people often work in traditional, hierarchical professions with less formal education; fluid people pursue creative, academic, or professional careers with higher education.
  • Lifestyle preferences: Worldview shapes choices in cars (pickup vs. Prius), pets, food, music, and entertainment, reinforcing social segregation.
  • Religious and social life: Fixed individuals are more religious and attend church regularly, while fluid individuals are more secular or spiritual.

10. What does Prius Or Pickup? say about the relationship between worldview and attitudes toward race, immigration, and culture?

  • Fixed worldview and wariness: Those with fixed worldviews are more wary of racial and cultural diversity, expressing negative attitudes toward immigrants and minorities.
  • Fluid worldview and openness: Fluid individuals are more accepting of diversity and support multiculturalism and equal rights.
  • Mixed worldview alignment: Mixed individuals often side with the fixed on issues of race and immigration, making fluid attitudes less common in the broader electorate.
  • Stability of attitudes: These attitudes are stable over time and shape party coalitions.

11. What are the political and social consequences of worldview politics in Prius Or Pickup? for American democracy?

  • Erosion of democratic norms: The alignment of worldview and partisanship increases tolerance for antidemocratic preferences and decreases support for checks and balances.
  • Institutional challenges: Leaders exploit worldview divisions to attack democratic institutions, threatening governance stability.
  • Polarization and gridlock: Intense partisan hatred leads to legislative dysfunction and undermines the government’s ability to address issues.
  • Rise of partyism: Negative feelings toward the opposing party now exceed racial or ethnic prejudices, affecting social and family relationships.

12. What solutions or paths forward does Prius Or Pickup? by Marc Hetherington and Jonathan Weiler suggest for overcoming America’s great divide?

  • Understanding worldviews: Recognizing the psychological and cultural roots of divides is essential for meaningful dialogue and reducing polarization.
  • Encouraging contact: Increasing genuine interaction between fixed and fluid individuals can reduce prejudice and build empathy.
  • Bridging social capital: Reviving community organizations and activities that bring diverse groups together can foster trust and understanding.
  • Changing incentives: Political elites are unlikely to change without new incentives, but shifts in economic conditions, crises, or grassroots movements could reorient politics away from worldview-based divides.

Review Summary

3.85 out of 5
Average of 100+ ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

Prius or Pickup? explores America's political divide through the lens of "fixed" and "fluid" worldviews. The authors argue that these perspectives shape consumer choices, political affiliations, and social attitudes. While some readers found the premise insightful and well-supported by data, others criticized the book for oversimplification and bias. Many appreciated the book's analysis of polarization but felt it lacked solutions. The writing style received mixed reviews, with some finding it repetitive. Overall, readers found the book thought-provoking, even if not all agreed with its conclusions.

Your rating:
4.39
34 ratings

About the Author

Marc Hetherington is a political scientist and professor at the University of North Carolina. He co-authored "Prius or Pickup?" with Jonathan Weiler, examining the cultural and political divisions in America. Hetherington's research focuses on public opinion, political psychology, and the factors that shape voting behavior. He has published extensively on topics related to political polarization and trust in government. Hetherington's work often employs data-driven approaches to analyze societal trends and their impact on political attitudes. His expertise in American politics and voter behavior has made him a respected voice in academic and public discussions on contemporary political issues.

Download PDF

To save this Prius Or Pickup? summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.23 MB     Pages: 14

Download EPUB

To read this Prius Or Pickup? summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 3.48 MB     Pages: 9
Listen
0:00
-0:00
1x
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
Select Speed
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Home
Library
Get App
Create a free account to unlock:
Requests: Request new book summaries
Bookmarks: Save your favorite books
History: Revisit books later
Recommendations: Personalized for you
Ratings: Rate books & see your ratings
100,000+ readers
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Listen, bookmark, and more
Compare Features Free Pro
📖 Read Summaries
All summaries are free to read in 40 languages
🎧 Listen to Summaries
Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 4
📜 Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 4
📥 Unlimited Downloads
Free users are limited to 1
Risk-Free Timeline
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Jun 8,
cancel anytime before.
Consume 2.8x More Books
2.8x more books Listening Reading
Our users love us
100,000+ readers
"...I can 10x the number of books I can read..."
"...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented..."
"...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision..."
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/year
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Try Free & Unlock
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Scanner
Find a barcode to scan

Settings
General
Widget
Loading...