Key Takeaways
1. The Modern Mind Emerged from Religious and Scientific Conflict
The mind was a radically destabilizing, heretical idea that grew out of intense, often violent, conflict.
Clash of Worldviews. The concept of the "mind" as we understand it today didn't arise from calm academic discussions. It was forged in the crucible of 17th and 18th-century Europe, a period marked by intense clashes between traditional religious beliefs, the rise of natural science, and shifting political power structures. This era saw established views on nature, ethics, and the soul challenged by new ideas about the material world and human experience.
The Soul Under Siege. For centuries, the soul had been the cornerstone of Western thought, the link between humanity, nature, and God. However, religious wars and scientific discoveries began to erode the authority of this concept. The rise of skepticism, fueled by figures like Copernicus and Galileo, questioned long-held beliefs about the cosmos and humanity's place within it.
A New Concept is Born. As the old order crumbled, thinkers began to explore alternative explanations for human thought and behavior. The idea of an embodied mind, a material entity capable of subjectivity, emerged as a radical and controversial concept. This new idea challenged traditional notions of truth, morality, and the relationship between the individual and society, setting the stage for a new era of intellectual and political upheaval.
2. Early Modern Science Redefined Nature, but Shied Away from the Soul
If Nature was a clock, as the common analogy declared, then something would always be missing.
The Mechanical Philosophy. Figures like Marin Mersenne and Pierre Gassendi sought to reconcile science and religion by proposing a mechanical view of nature. They envisioned the universe as a vast machine governed by physical laws, a system that could be understood through mathematics and observation. This mechanical philosophy challenged animistic and magical beliefs, emphasizing the importance of reason and empirical evidence.
Limits of the Machine. While embracing the mechanical view of nature, these thinkers recognized its limitations. They argued that machines, no matter how complex, could not account for higher-level human experiences like consciousness, intention, and morality. These qualities, they believed, required a separate, immaterial soul, a divine gift that set humanity apart from the rest of creation.
A Divided World. This compromise created a divided world, with science focused on the material realm and religion focused on the spiritual. Natural philosophers could freely explore the workings of nature, but they were expected to respect the boundaries of faith and avoid questions about the soul's nature or destiny. This division, while intended to preserve social order, would prove increasingly difficult to maintain as scientific inquiry delved deeper into the mysteries of the human brain.
3. The Soul's Disorders Became Medical and Political Battlegrounds
After the Reformation, the realm of the soul had been a bloody one.
The Reformation's Legacy. The Reformation unleashed a wave of religious conflict across Europe, as competing Christian sects clashed over doctrines of salvation and the nature of the soul. This period of intense religious warfare created a climate of uncertainty and anxiety, shaking the foundations of traditional authority.
Witchcraft and Possession. Beliefs about demonic possession and witchcraft became entangled with religious and political tensions. Accusations of witchcraft were often used to target political enemies or enforce social norms. The question of whether a person was truly possessed or simply mentally ill became a subject of intense debate, blurring the lines between the spiritual and the medical.
Enthusiasm and Madness. The rise of radical Protestant sects, with their emphasis on personal revelation and direct communion with God, further complicated the picture. Claims of divine inspiration were often viewed with suspicion, as they could be used to justify rebellion against established authority. Religious enthusiasm became pathologized as a form of madness, a dangerous deviation from reason and social order.
4. A Crisis of Conscience: Ethics Adrift in a Natural World
By placing such weight on the workings of what was the rational soul, these moderns were forced to closely reconsider not just its immortality, but also functions like understanding, imagination, and thought as well as their shadows, illusion, hallucination, and delusion.
Erosion of Moral Foundations. The rise of scientific materialism and the decline of religious authority created a crisis of conscience in the 17th and 18th centuries. Traditional ethical systems, based on divine law and the promise of salvation, lost their sway as people began to question the existence of God and the immortality of the soul.
The Search for New Ethics. Without a clear moral compass, thinkers grappled with the problem of how to establish ethical conduct in a natural world. Some turned to reason, arguing that rational principles could guide human behavior. Others emphasized the importance of emotions and social instincts, suggesting that empathy and compassion could serve as the basis for morality.
The Problem of Free Will. The question of free will became central to these debates. If human actions were determined by physical laws or social forces, could individuals be held morally responsible for their choices? This question challenged long-held beliefs about guilt, innocence, and the nature of justice.
5. The English Mind: From Oxford Experiments to London Salons
Virtuosi knew this better than even scholastics, who in their unified system endowed plants and animals with different souls, and confused what was immortal with what was not.
The Oxford Experimental Philosophical Clubbe. The return of the monarchy in England fostered a new intellectual climate, one that valued empirical observation and experimentation. The Oxford Experimental Philosophical Clubbe, a group of scientists and thinkers, sought to break from the scholastic traditions of the past and develop a "modern" approach to understanding nature.
The Royal Society and Robert Boyle. The founding of the Royal Society in 1660 marked a turning point in the history of science. Robert Boyle, a wealthy and influential member of the society, championed inductive logic and experimentation, emphasizing the importance of gathering facts and testing hypotheses. However, Boyle also insisted on the limits of science, arguing that the soul and other spiritual matters were beyond its reach.
Thomas Willis and the Anatomy of the Brain. Thomas Willis, a physician and member of the Oxford group, made groundbreaking contributions to the study of the brain. Through careful dissections and experiments, he mapped the structure and function of the brain, laying the foundation for the field of neurology. However, Willis also struggled to reconcile his scientific findings with his religious beliefs, ultimately concluding that the rational soul remained the "chief mover of the animal Machine."
6. French Sensationalists: The Mind as a Product of Sensation
The soul, known from antiquity as that which understands all things but itself, would perhaps now be more explicable through a “Doctrine of the Soul” or a “psychologie.”
Locke's Influence. John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding had a profound impact on French thought, challenging Cartesian dualism and emphasizing the role of experience in shaping the mind. Locke's concept of the tabula rasa, the idea that the mind is a blank slate at birth, became a cornerstone of sensationalist philosophy.
Condillac and the Statue. Étienne Bonnot de Condillac took Locke's ideas to their logical extreme, arguing that all mental faculties, including thought, memory, and consciousness, could be derived from sensation alone. In his famous thought experiment, Condillac imagined a statue endowed with only one sense, demonstrating how all other mental abilities could arise from that single source of experience.
The Limits of Sensationalism. While sensationalism offered a powerful explanation for the origins of knowledge, it also raised troubling questions about free will and morality. If all our thoughts and actions were determined by sensory input, could we be held responsible for our choices? This question would haunt French thinkers for decades to come.
7. Vitalism: Bridging the Gap Between Matter and Mind
Matter was made to think by the “great God, as the only Workman, so also as the First Mover.”
The Problem of Inert Matter. The mechanical philosophy struggled to explain the active, purposeful nature of living beings. How could inert matter, governed by simple laws of motion, give rise to the complex behaviors and self-organizing properties of living organisms?
The Rise of Vitalism. To address this problem, some thinkers turned to vitalism, the belief that living matter possessed a unique, non-material force that animated it. This vital force, often called the anima or élan vital, was seen as the source of life, growth, and consciousness.
Montpellier and the Animal Economy. The medical school at Montpellier became a center for vitalist thought. Physicians like Théophile Bordeu and Paul-Joseph Barthez sought to understand the "animal economy," the complex interplay of organs and systems that constituted a living being. They emphasized the importance of sensibility, the capacity for feeling and responding to stimuli, as a key characteristic of living matter.
8. Kant's Revolution: Reason, Limits, and the Unknowable Soul
The soul, known from antiquity as that which understands all things but itself, would perhaps now be more explicable through a “Doctrine of the Soul” or a “psychologie.”
The Limits of Reason. Immanuel Kant challenged both rationalism and empiricism, arguing that human knowledge was limited by the structure of the mind itself. He proposed that our minds impose certain categories and concepts on our experience, shaping the way we perceive and understand the world.
The Transcendental Ego. Kant distinguished between the phenomenal world, the world as it appears to us, and the noumenal world, the world as it is in itself. He argued that we can never know the noumenal world directly, as our minds always filter and interpret our experience. This unknowable realm included the soul, which Kant considered to be beyond the reach of reason.
Moral Freedom. While limiting the scope of reason, Kant also sought to preserve human freedom and morality. He argued that we can access the moral law through our reason, which dictates that we must act in accordance with universal principles. This moral law, Kant believed, provides a basis for ethical conduct that is independent of both religious dogma and empirical observation.
9. The Promise of Phrenology: Mapping the Mind on the Skull
The soul, known from antiquity as that which understands all things but itself, would perhaps now be more explicable through a “Doctrine of the Soul” or a “psychologie.”
Gall's Organology. Franz Joseph Gall sought to bridge the gap between mind and brain by proposing that mental faculties were localized in specific regions of the brain. He believed that the size and shape of these regions could be determined by examining the skull, giving rise to the practice of phrenology.
The Skull as a Map of the Mind. Phrenologists claimed that the skull was a direct reflection of the underlying brain, with bumps and depressions indicating the size and strength of different mental faculties. By carefully measuring and analyzing the skull, they believed they could determine a person's character, abilities, and potential.
Phrenology's Popularity and Decline. Phrenology gained widespread popularity in the 19th century, attracting followers from all walks of life. However, it was eventually discredited by scientific evidence, as researchers failed to find any consistent correlation between skull shape and mental traits. Despite its scientific failings, phrenology had a lasting impact on the study of the brain and the mind, stimulating interest in cerebral localization and the biological basis of behavior.
10. The Mind Eclipsed: A Retreat from Mentalism
Humans, it had been said, possessed something that was part soul and part machine, but fully neither.
The Rise of Scientific Materialism. In the mid-19th century, a new generation of scientists sought to eliminate the mind altogether, arguing that all mental phenomena could be explained by physical processes in the brain. This materialistic view rejected both dualism and vitalism, emphasizing the importance of empirical observation and experimental methods.
The Limits of Reductionism. While scientific materialism made significant progress in understanding the brain, it struggled to account for subjective experience and the complexities of human consciousness. The attempt to reduce the mind to a collection of physical processes often seemed to leave out something essential, the very qualities that made us human.
The Enduring Questions. Despite the rise of scientific materialism, questions about the nature of the mind, the soul, and the relationship between the two continue to fascinate and challenge thinkers today. The debates that began in the early modern period remain relevant, reminding us of the enduring mysteries of human existence.
Last updated:
Review Summary
Soul Machine explores the evolution of the mind concept from the Enlightenment to modern neuroscience. Reviewers praise Makari's comprehensive historical approach, connecting philosophy, science, and religion. Many find it intellectually stimulating, though some note its encyclopedic nature can be overwhelming. The book is lauded for its relevance to contemporary debates on consciousness and mental health. While some criticize its structure and lack of a clear thesis, most reviewers appreciate its depth and insights into the development of our understanding of the mind.
Similar Books








