Facebook Pixel
Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Why We Can't Afford the Rich

Why We Can't Afford the Rich

by Andrew Sayer 2014 450 pages
4.02
100+ ratings
Listen
9 minutes

Key Takeaways

1. The rich extract wealth through unearned income, not wealth creation

Like rent, interest is asset-based unearned income that accrues without any effort.

Unearned income sources: The wealthy primarily accumulate wealth through:

  • Rent from property ownership
  • Interest on loans and financial assets
  • Profits from business ownership without direct involvement
  • Capital gains from asset appreciation
  • Value-skimming through financial intermediation

These mechanisms allow the rich to extract wealth produced by others without contributing directly to its creation. This challenges the notion that the wealthy "earn" their fortunes through superior skill or productivity.

Structural advantages: The ability to extract unearned income is built into capitalist economies through:

  • Private ownership of key assets like land and capital
  • Financial systems that favor those with existing wealth
  • Legal frameworks that protect rentier interests
  • Political influence to shape policies in their favor

This system perpetuates and amplifies existing inequalities, making it increasingly difficult for those without capital to accumulate wealth through work alone.

2. Capitalism's structural inequalities perpetuate an unfair division of labor

We should see through the illusion that differences in the quality of jobs and what they require or allow people to do are a reflection of innate differences in intelligence.

Unequal division of labor: Capitalism creates a hierarchy of work where:

  • A minority monopolize high-quality, fulfilling jobs
  • The majority are relegated to less desirable, often monotonous work
  • This division is often justified as reflecting natural differences in ability

However, this arrangement is largely a product of social and economic structures, not innate talent. It perpetuates inequality by:

  • Concentrating opportunities for skill development and advancement
  • Reinforcing class divisions across generations
  • Limiting the potential for social mobility

Contributive injustice: This system creates a "contributive injustice" where:

  • Some are denied the opportunity to develop and use their full capacities
  • Others hoard meaningful work, limiting opportunities for others
  • Society loses out on the potential contributions of many talented individuals

Addressing this requires reimagining how work is organized and valued in society, moving towards a more equitable distribution of both the benefits and burdens of labor.

3. Financialization has concentrated wealth and power in the hands of the few

The financial sector was remarkably successful in policing itself, and hence in minimising change.

Rise of finance: Over the past few decades, the financial sector has:

  • Grown to dominate many economies
  • Created increasingly complex financial instruments
  • Shifted focus from supporting productive investment to extracting wealth

This transformation has had profound effects:

  • Increased economic instability and frequency of crises
  • Diverted resources from productive sectors of the economy
  • Concentrated wealth and power in the hands of financial elites

Regulatory capture: The financial industry has successfully:

  • Lobbied for deregulation and favorable policies
  • Resisted meaningful reform, even after major crises
  • Placed industry insiders in key regulatory and policy-making positions

This "revolving door" between finance and government has created a system where the industry effectively regulates itself, prioritizing its own interests over those of the broader economy and society.

4. Tax havens and legal corruption enable the rich to avoid accountability

Tax havens are not just places that happen to have low taxes, but secrecy jurisdictions in which financial wealth can be hidden.

Tax haven ecosystem: A global network of tax havens allows the wealthy to:

  • Hide assets from taxation and scrutiny
  • Engage in complex tax avoidance schemes
  • Shield potentially illegal activities

Key features of this system include:

  • Strict financial secrecy laws
  • Complex legal structures to obscure ownership
  • Cooperation between major financial centers and offshore jurisdictions

Beyond taxation: The impact of tax havens goes beyond lost tax revenue:

  • Undermines democratic accountability
  • Facilitates corruption and illegal activities
  • Distorts competition and market forces
  • Increases inequality by allowing the rich to play by different rules

Addressing this issue requires international cooperation and a fundamental rethinking of how global finance is regulated and monitored.

5. Philanthropy often serves to legitimize wealth rather than address root causes

Philanthropy is a way in which the rich can gain some legitimacy while retaining control over vast resources.

Motivations and limitations: While philanthropic giving can have positive impacts, it often:

  • Allows the wealthy to shape social priorities without democratic input
  • Focuses on symptoms rather than underlying causes of social problems
  • Provides tax benefits and positive publicity for donors

Common philanthropic practices:

  • Creating private foundations controlled by the donor
  • Funding elite institutions like prestigious universities
  • Supporting causes that don't challenge existing power structures

Systemic issues: Philanthropy can actually reinforce inequality by:

  • Positioning the wealthy as benevolent saviors rather than beneficiaries of an unfair system
  • Diverting attention from the need for structural economic reforms
  • Reducing pressure for more progressive taxation and social spending

A more effective approach would involve addressing the root causes of inequality and empowering communities to determine their own priorities and solutions.

6. The pursuit of endless economic growth is incompatible with environmental sustainability

Capitalism is addicted to growth and goes into crisis if it cannot grow.

Growth imperative: Capitalist economies require continuous growth to:

  • Generate profits for investors
  • Create jobs and raise living standards
  • Repay debts with interest
  • Maintain social and political stability

However, this pursuit of endless growth on a finite planet is leading to:

  • Depletion of natural resources
  • Ecosystem destruction and biodiversity loss
  • Accelerating climate change

False solutions: Proposed remedies that don't address the growth problem include:

  • "Green growth" that assumes technology can decouple growth from environmental impact
  • Market-based solutions like carbon trading that don't reduce overall emissions
  • Geoengineering schemes that carry high risks and don't address root causes

A fundamental rethinking of economic priorities is necessary to create a sustainable future, focusing on well-being and sufficiency rather than continuous expansion.

7. Achieving climate justice requires both equality and reduced consumption in rich countries

No one has the right to more of the earth's resources, including its capacity to re-absorb CO2, than the total of those resources divided by the world's population.

Climate inequality: The impacts and responsibilities of climate change are unequally distributed:

  • Rich countries and individuals have much larger carbon footprints
  • Poor countries and communities are most vulnerable to climate impacts
  • Historical emissions from industrialized nations continue to drive warming

Addressing this requires a two-pronged approach:

  1. Equalizing emissions rights globally
  2. Drastically reducing consumption and emissions in wealthy nations

Contraction and convergence: This concept proposes:

  • A global carbon budget based on safe emissions levels
  • Convergence towards equal per-capita emissions rights
  • Rapid reductions (contraction) in high-emitting countries

Implementing this would require major changes in lifestyles and economic systems in rich countries, including:

  • Reduced consumption, especially of carbon-intensive goods and services
  • Transformation of energy, transportation, and food systems
  • New models of well-being not based on material growth

This approach combines environmental sustainability with social justice, recognizing that addressing climate change and inequality are inseparable challenges.

Last updated:

Review Summary

4.02 out of 5
Average of 100+ ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

Why we can't afford the rich receives mostly positive reviews for its critique of wealth inequality and capitalism. Readers appreciate Sayer's clear explanations of complex economic concepts and his analysis of how the rich extract wealth from society. Some find the book thought-provoking and eye-opening, while others criticize its logic and examples. The book is praised for its detailed research and engaging writing style, though some find it repetitive or entry-level. Overall, it's seen as a valuable introduction to leftist economic thinking, despite mixed opinions on its proposed solutions.

Your rating:

About the Author

Andrew Sayer is a British social scientist and professor of social theory and political economy at Lancaster University. He is known for his work on critical social science, moral economy, and social justice. Sayer has written extensively on topics such as class, inequality, and the nature of capitalism. His academic background spans economics, sociology, and philosophy, allowing him to bring a multidisciplinary approach to his analysis of socio-economic issues. Sayer's writing style is noted for its clarity and accessibility, making complex economic concepts understandable to a general audience. He is considered an important voice in contemporary leftist economic thought and social criticism.

Download PDF

To save this Why We Can't Afford the Rich summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.48 MB     Pages: 11

Download EPUB

To read this Why We Can't Afford the Rich summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 3.20 MB     Pages: 9
0:00
-0:00
1x
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
Select Speed
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Create a free account to unlock:
Bookmarks – save your favorite books
History – revisit books later
Ratings – rate books & see your ratings
Unlock unlimited listening
Your first week's on us!
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Nov 30,
cancel anytime before.
Compare Features Free Pro
Read full text summaries
Summaries are free to read for everyone
Listen to summaries
12,000+ hours of audio
Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 10
Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 10
What our users say
30,000+ readers
“...I can 10x the number of books I can read...”
“...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented...”
“...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision...”
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/yr
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Try Free & Unlock
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Settings
Appearance