Key Takeaways
1. The rich extract wealth through unearned income, not wealth creation
Like rent, interest is asset-based unearned income that accrues without any effort.
Unearned income sources: The wealthy primarily accumulate wealth through:
- Rent from property ownership
- Interest on loans and financial assets
- Profits from business ownership without direct involvement
- Capital gains from asset appreciation
- Value-skimming through financial intermediation
These mechanisms allow the rich to extract wealth produced by others without contributing directly to its creation. This challenges the notion that the wealthy "earn" their fortunes through superior skill or productivity.
Structural advantages: The ability to extract unearned income is built into capitalist economies through:
- Private ownership of key assets like land and capital
- Financial systems that favor those with existing wealth
- Legal frameworks that protect rentier interests
- Political influence to shape policies in their favor
This system perpetuates and amplifies existing inequalities, making it increasingly difficult for those without capital to accumulate wealth through work alone.
2. Capitalism's structural inequalities perpetuate an unfair division of labor
We should see through the illusion that differences in the quality of jobs and what they require or allow people to do are a reflection of innate differences in intelligence.
Unequal division of labor: Capitalism creates a hierarchy of work where:
- A minority monopolize high-quality, fulfilling jobs
- The majority are relegated to less desirable, often monotonous work
- This division is often justified as reflecting natural differences in ability
However, this arrangement is largely a product of social and economic structures, not innate talent. It perpetuates inequality by:
- Concentrating opportunities for skill development and advancement
- Reinforcing class divisions across generations
- Limiting the potential for social mobility
Contributive injustice: This system creates a "contributive injustice" where:
- Some are denied the opportunity to develop and use their full capacities
- Others hoard meaningful work, limiting opportunities for others
- Society loses out on the potential contributions of many talented individuals
Addressing this requires reimagining how work is organized and valued in society, moving towards a more equitable distribution of both the benefits and burdens of labor.
3. Financialization has concentrated wealth and power in the hands of the few
The financial sector was remarkably successful in policing itself, and hence in minimising change.
Rise of finance: Over the past few decades, the financial sector has:
- Grown to dominate many economies
- Created increasingly complex financial instruments
- Shifted focus from supporting productive investment to extracting wealth
This transformation has had profound effects:
- Increased economic instability and frequency of crises
- Diverted resources from productive sectors of the economy
- Concentrated wealth and power in the hands of financial elites
Regulatory capture: The financial industry has successfully:
- Lobbied for deregulation and favorable policies
- Resisted meaningful reform, even after major crises
- Placed industry insiders in key regulatory and policy-making positions
This "revolving door" between finance and government has created a system where the industry effectively regulates itself, prioritizing its own interests over those of the broader economy and society.
4. Tax havens and legal corruption enable the rich to avoid accountability
Tax havens are not just places that happen to have low taxes, but secrecy jurisdictions in which financial wealth can be hidden.
Tax haven ecosystem: A global network of tax havens allows the wealthy to:
- Hide assets from taxation and scrutiny
- Engage in complex tax avoidance schemes
- Shield potentially illegal activities
Key features of this system include:
- Strict financial secrecy laws
- Complex legal structures to obscure ownership
- Cooperation between major financial centers and offshore jurisdictions
Beyond taxation: The impact of tax havens goes beyond lost tax revenue:
- Undermines democratic accountability
- Facilitates corruption and illegal activities
- Distorts competition and market forces
- Increases inequality by allowing the rich to play by different rules
Addressing this issue requires international cooperation and a fundamental rethinking of how global finance is regulated and monitored.
5. Philanthropy often serves to legitimize wealth rather than address root causes
Philanthropy is a way in which the rich can gain some legitimacy while retaining control over vast resources.
Motivations and limitations: While philanthropic giving can have positive impacts, it often:
- Allows the wealthy to shape social priorities without democratic input
- Focuses on symptoms rather than underlying causes of social problems
- Provides tax benefits and positive publicity for donors
Common philanthropic practices:
- Creating private foundations controlled by the donor
- Funding elite institutions like prestigious universities
- Supporting causes that don't challenge existing power structures
Systemic issues: Philanthropy can actually reinforce inequality by:
- Positioning the wealthy as benevolent saviors rather than beneficiaries of an unfair system
- Diverting attention from the need for structural economic reforms
- Reducing pressure for more progressive taxation and social spending
A more effective approach would involve addressing the root causes of inequality and empowering communities to determine their own priorities and solutions.
6. The pursuit of endless economic growth is incompatible with environmental sustainability
Capitalism is addicted to growth and goes into crisis if it cannot grow.
Growth imperative: Capitalist economies require continuous growth to:
- Generate profits for investors
- Create jobs and raise living standards
- Repay debts with interest
- Maintain social and political stability
However, this pursuit of endless growth on a finite planet is leading to:
- Depletion of natural resources
- Ecosystem destruction and biodiversity loss
- Accelerating climate change
False solutions: Proposed remedies that don't address the growth problem include:
- "Green growth" that assumes technology can decouple growth from environmental impact
- Market-based solutions like carbon trading that don't reduce overall emissions
- Geoengineering schemes that carry high risks and don't address root causes
A fundamental rethinking of economic priorities is necessary to create a sustainable future, focusing on well-being and sufficiency rather than continuous expansion.
7. Achieving climate justice requires both equality and reduced consumption in rich countries
No one has the right to more of the earth's resources, including its capacity to re-absorb CO2, than the total of those resources divided by the world's population.
Climate inequality: The impacts and responsibilities of climate change are unequally distributed:
- Rich countries and individuals have much larger carbon footprints
- Poor countries and communities are most vulnerable to climate impacts
- Historical emissions from industrialized nations continue to drive warming
Addressing this requires a two-pronged approach:
- Equalizing emissions rights globally
- Drastically reducing consumption and emissions in wealthy nations
Contraction and convergence: This concept proposes:
- A global carbon budget based on safe emissions levels
- Convergence towards equal per-capita emissions rights
- Rapid reductions (contraction) in high-emitting countries
Implementing this would require major changes in lifestyles and economic systems in rich countries, including:
- Reduced consumption, especially of carbon-intensive goods and services
- Transformation of energy, transportation, and food systems
- New models of well-being not based on material growth
This approach combines environmental sustainability with social justice, recognizing that addressing climate change and inequality are inseparable challenges.
Last updated:
Review Summary
Why we can't afford the rich receives mostly positive reviews for its critique of wealth inequality and capitalism. Readers appreciate Sayer's clear explanations of complex economic concepts and his analysis of how the rich extract wealth from society. Some find the book thought-provoking and eye-opening, while others criticize its logic and examples. The book is praised for its detailed research and engaging writing style, though some find it repetitive or entry-level. Overall, it's seen as a valuable introduction to leftist economic thinking, despite mixed opinions on its proposed solutions.
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub
digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.