Key Takeaways
Rehearse your words in advance; improvising mid-sentence is where deals die
The core premise: the worst moment to hunt for the perfect phrase is the instant you need it. Jones argues that top performers and average ones often have identical products, prices, and territories, yet get wildly different results. The difference is not charisma or luck. It is knowing exactly what to say, when to say it, and how to make it land.
Magic Words are scripted phrases aimed at the subconscious brain, the fast, reflexive part of the mind that outputs only yes or no and never lingers on maybe. Just as your subconscious controls your breathing while you sleep or snaps your attention to the sound of your name, the right verbal triggers slip past conscious resistance and prompt a decision. Preparation, not spontaneity, gives you the fair advantage in almost every conversation.
The claim echoes performance science: elite surgeons, pilots, and athletes rely on rehearsed scripts and checklists precisely because working memory collapses under pressure. What's notable is Jones extending this to everyday talk, treating sentences like muscle memory. The subconscious framing is a useful metaphor, though dual-process researchers like Kahneman would call it System 1 rather than a literal yes/no computer. A fair critique: scripts can sound canned if delivered without genuine listening. The book's own remedy is repetition until phrases feel natural, which aligns with how expertise actually forms, through thousands of reps that turn deliberate technique into invisible fluency.
Kill the fear of rejection by handing people a graceful exit first
Lower the pressure, raise the intrigue. Jones opens with a phrase engineered to be rejection-proof: "I'm not sure if it's for you, but..." By openly conceding the person might not want it, you remove pressure and spike curiosity. The kicker is the word "but," which quietly erases everything before it. When a boss says "you're valuable, but things must change," you only hear the change. Here that mechanic works in your favor: the listener hears "maybe I should look at this."
A cousin phrase weaponizes identity. Almost nobody admits to being closed-minded, so "How open-minded are you about...?" shifts the odds of a yes from roughly fifty-fifty to ninety-ten. You appear to offer a free choice while heavily weighting the only option you want them to take.
Both phrases exploit well-documented biases. The open-minded gambit is a form of what psychologists call consistency pressure, cousin to Cialdini's commitment principle: once people claim an identity, they act to defend it. The "but" erasure reflects recency and negation effects in memory. There is an ethical tension worth naming. These tools manufacture the feeling of choice while narrowing it, which is persuasion's perennial gray zone. Jones frames it as helping the hesitant decide, but the same lever can nudge people toward things against their interest. The honest test: would you use the phrase if the listener could see the mechanism behind it?
People move to avoid loss faster than to chase gain, and they feel before they reason
Motivation means a reason to move. Jones dissects the word itself: motive (reason) plus action. Give someone a big enough reason and they will do almost anything. People are pulled by two forces: acquiring a gain or avoiding a loss. Crucially, humans work harder to dodge a loss than to win an equivalent prize, and the sharper the contrast between where they fear being and where they hope to be, the stronger the pull.
Feeling precedes logic, always. Every decision is made emotionally first, then justified rationally. Arguing that your idea "just makes sense" targets the wrong system. The phrase "How would you feel if...?" lets people time-travel into a future scenario and feel its emotions now, whether it is landing a promotion or losing everything.
This is loss aversion, the finding that earned Kahneman and Tversky lasting fame: losses register roughly twice as painfully as equivalent gains feel good. Neuroscience backs the emotion-first claim too. Antonio Damasio's work on patients with damaged emotional centers showed they could reason endlessly yet couldn't decide, because emotion is the trigger that converts analysis into action. Jones translates lab findings into a single practical sentence. The caution: relentlessly conjuring fear-of-loss scenarios can curdle into manipulation or anxiety-selling. The most durable version pairs an honest loss with a genuine gain, so the contrast reflects reality rather than manufactured dread.
Every decision is made twice, so install the mental movie before asking for a yes
Imagination is the dress rehearsal for reality. Jones claims a choice is made first in the mind, hypothetically, and only later in the world. If someone literally cannot picture themselves doing a thing, the odds they do it are slim. We have all said "I just couldn't see myself doing that," and meant it.
Stories build the pictures. Children drop into "once upon a time," and adults respond to "Just imagine...," which flips the brain's image viewer on. Instead of describing benefits, you let the listener render the scene themselves: the kids' faces when you announce the trip, pulling into the driveway in the new car. Their own imagination builds a more vivid, believable reality than any pitch you could deliver, and belief in achieving it climbs.
Sports psychology has validated this for decades: mental rehearsal measurably improves performance, activating many of the same neural pathways as physical practice. Marketing leans on it too, which is why real estate agents stage homes and car dealers push test drives, letting prospects pre-live ownership. Jones's insight is that you can trigger the same simulation with two words rather than props. One nuance worth adding: vividness cuts both ways. If you invite someone to imagine and they picture failure or buyer's remorse, you have armed the objection. Skilled use means steering the mental scene toward the specific, positive, sensory detail you want them to inhabit.
Assume the yes and pre-empt the excuse before it is spoken
Phrase questions as if the answer is already yes. Asking "When would be a good time to take a look?" quietly assumes there is a good time, sidestepping the most common brush-off, "I don't have time." It reduces the conversation to scheduling logistics rather than a yes-or-no gate.
Name the excuse to disarm it. When you fear someone dropped the ball, don't ask how it went. Say "I'm guessing you haven't got around to speaking with your partner yet?" This hands them a face-saving out while blocking the excuse they had loaded. Most people, being people of their word, either proudly report they did it or feel a twinge of guilt and promise to fix it. Two more upgrades: replace "Do you have any questions?" with "What questions do you have?" and "Can I have your number?" with "What's the best number to reach you?"
These are presupposition techniques, long studied in linguistics and courtroom cross-examination, where the framing of a question smuggles in an assumption the respondent must actively fight to reject. "When," not "if," is the same move salespeople call the assumptive close. The "I'm guessing you haven't" gambit is subtler, borrowing from reverse psychology and self-consistency: people scramble to prove a mildly negative prediction wrong. The open-versus-closed question swap is genuinely underrated. Research on survey design shows question wording dramatically shifts responses. The risk is transparency; assume-the-yes phrasing feels slick if overused, and sophisticated buyers notice when every question is quietly loaded.
Whoever asks the questions controls the conversation, so answer objections with curiosity
An objection is a grab for control. The moment someone says "I need to think about it" or "it's too expensive," power shifts to them and you are stuck reacting. The instinct to fire back a counterargument only starts a fight, and arguments produce losers, never sales. Jones reframes every objection as merely a question, which you answer with a question to reclaim control.
Two questions do most of the work:
1. "What makes you say that?" forces the person to explain the real basis of their objection, often revealing it was flimsy.
2. "Just out of curiosity, what is it you need to think about?" softens a blunt probe into something disarming, then demands silence.
The related "What do you know about...?" quietly threatens a know-it-all's evidence base, nudging certainty toward doubt without a confrontation.
This mirrors the Socratic method: you don't refute a belief, you expose the shaky ground it stands on and let the person revise it themselves, which preserves their dignity and their ownership of the conclusion. Negotiation research from Chris Voss ("Never Split the Difference") converges here, favoring calibrated "what" and "how" questions over statements. The silence instruction is the sharpest tool: studies of interrogation and sales alike show most people cannot tolerate a pause and will fill it with truth. The ethical line holds better here than elsewhere in the book, because genuine questions surface real obstacles rather than merely engineering compliance.
Shrink and stack the options so your preferred choice becomes the path of least resistance
Fewer, polarized choices are easier to make. Red or white, beach or ski. Jones says the salesperson's real job is being a "decision catalyst," a professional mind-maker-upper. Three tools narrow the gaze:
1. "As I see it, you have three options." List three, bury your favorite last, and load the first two so they look painful, then close with "which is easier for you?"
2. "There are two types of people...," which makes the listener instantly wonder which one they are, then hands them a flattering choice and a foolish one.
3. The word "enough." Asking "Would three bottles be enough?" instead of "two or three?" makes yes the reflex answer and quietly bumps the quantity up.
Each method disguises a weighted recommendation as a neutral menu.
This is choice architecture, the field Thaler and Sunstein named "nudge." Barry Schwartz's paradox of choice explains why narrowing helps: too many options paralyze, so a curated three feels like relief, not manipulation. The "enough" trick is anchoring in action, and the two-types framing exploits our hunger for self-categorization. The obvious caveat is that stacked options are persuasion, not neutral guidance, and a savvy listener who spots the loaded first two choices may resent the theater. The strongest defense of the technique is that indecision itself is a cost, and helping someone commit to a reasonable option can be a genuine service.
Cite what most people do; social proof turns hesitation into safety
People trust that the crowd already vetted the risk. Jones calls "most people" his single most profitable phrase. Picture kids on a rock ledge above water: nobody jumps until one does, surfaces grinning, and suddenly everyone wants in. Telling someone "what most people do is start with a small order" works because their subconscious reasons: I am most people, so that must be the smart move. It also lets you issue a recommendation you couldn't otherwise give without sounding bossy.
Relabel the negative into the positive. The phrase "The good news is..." attaches a label the listener cannot easily shake, redirecting a spiraling conversation toward optimism. And when someone hands you an excuse expecting pushback, replying "That's great, you've found another way that doesn't work" jolts their thinking off its rails.
Social proof is one of Cialdini's six principles of influence, and the herd instinct Jones describes is deeply evolutionary; following the group was a survival heuristic when going it alone meant getting eaten. Field experiments confirm its power: hotel towel-reuse signs citing what previous guests did outperform pure environmental appeals. The labeling move draws on framing theory, where the same fact packaged as "90% fat-free" beats "10% fat." One limit: social proof backfires when it accidentally normalizes the unwanted behavior, the classic error of telling people "too many of you are cheating." Effective use always spotlights the behavior you want copied, never the problem.
Lead people across the finish line; don't politely abandon them at the decision
Fear of seeming pushy leaves deals unclosed. After a great presentation, many people freeze, hoping the prospect will decide unprompted. Usually no one leads, so no decision happens and everyone loses. Jones insists it is your job to move a consultative conversation toward a close.
Direct the next step, don't request it. The phrase "What happens next is..." scripts the path forward, then ends on a question so effortless to answer that responding equals agreeing, like "What's the best address to register you?" Two supporting moves keep a wavering conversation alive: "Before you make your mind up..." nudges a leaning-no back to maybe by adding fresh information, and "If I can..., then will you...?" isolates a condition ("If I match that price, will you order today?") so you learn whether the objection is real, all without obligating yourself to deliver.
The reluctance Jones diagnoses is real and costly. Studies of sales calls find a large share end without anyone asking for commitment, the professional equivalent of running to the goal line and kneeling. The "what happens next" script is assumptive closing dressed as service. The "if I can, then will you" structure is elegant conditional bargaining, forcing the counterpart to pre-commit before you concede anything, a staple of hostage negotiation and labor talks alike. The ethical weight rests on genuinely believing the close serves the buyer. Leading someone toward a decision they will regret is not catalysis, it is coercion wearing a helpful mask.
Ask for favors and referrals the instant someone feels indebted to you
Gratitude is a debt waiting to be collected. Jones observes that "thank you" signals a feeling of owing something, making it the perfect cue to ask for more. The word "favor" is disarmingly powerful: "Could you do me a small favor?" wins near-automatic agreement before the person even knows the ask.
The Columbo close saves a dead conversation. Borrowing from the TV detective who turned at the door with "Oh, just one more thing," you drop a smaller request as you exit, a sample, a trial order, an event invite, when the other person's guard is down. This is the downsell: if you can't land the big goal, secure a tiny one. For referrals, wait for the thank-you, ask a favor, then request just one name of someone who, like them, would benefit, and then go silent.
Reciprocity is arguably the most robust of all influence principles, documented across cultures: an unsolicited gift or favor creates a nagging pull to repay. Jones's twist is timing, striking at the peak moment of felt indebtedness. Behavioral research on the "foot-in-the-door" effect supports the Columbo move: a small initial yes makes a larger later yes more likely, because people align actions with their self-image as agreeable. The referral script's genius is qualification; a warm introduction outperforms a cold name every time. The one friction point is authenticity. Reciprocity engineered too transparently reads as transactional, and the favors that truly bind are the ones freely given first.
Give an answer, not the answer; certainty sells better than a lecture
Simplicity beats a data dump. Jones closes with Roger, a veteran salesman present when the first text message was sent. When customers asked how the new digital phone technology worked, Roger tried dazzling them with technical detail and got only blank stares. His breakthrough: his job was not to give them the answer, only an answer. So when asked how it all worked, he simply said, "It works great." Nine times out of ten, customers were delighted.
Confidence is contagious. Asked what results to expect, answer "Good ones." A reply that is simple, positive, and effortless stuns people into moving forward rather than drowning them in facts that stall the decision. Jones's honest caveat: these words work with most people most of the time, not all people all the time. Repeat until they become natural speech.
Roger's lesson cuts against the expert's instinct to prove competence through detail, and it is validated by research on cognitive load: every extra fact a buyer must process raises friction and delays action. The paradox is that displayed expertise can reduce trust when it overwhelms. Yet this is the book's riskiest advice. "It works great" borders on evasion, and in high-stakes or regulated fields, glib confidence over substance is how misselling happens. The reconciling principle is reading the room: give the curious engineer real detail and the anxious buyer reassurance. Certainty comforts, but it should rest on a foundation the customer could inspect if they chose to.
Analysis
Phil Jones has written less a book than a field manual, a tightly packed anthology of roughly two dozen scripted phrases distilled from years of sales training. Its structure mirrors its philosophy: short, punchy, repeatable. Each chapter isolates one phrase, explains the psychological lever it pulls, and offers plug-and-play examples. The genre is practical persuasion, sitting beside Cialdini's "Influence" and Voss's "Never Split the Difference," but stripped of academic scaffolding in favor of immediate usability. That is both its strength and its vulnerability.
The strength is intellectual honesty about how decisions actually happen. Jones repeatedly grounds his phrases in two robust findings from behavioral economics: loss aversion (we fear losing more than we crave winning) and the primacy of emotion over reason (we feel first, justify second). His "decision made twice" claim aligns with mental-rehearsal research, and "most people" is textbook social proof. Where academics theorize, Jones operationalizes, compressing findings into a sentence a nervous salesperson can deploy tomorrow.
The vulnerability is ethical. Nearly every technique manufactures the feeling of free choice while quietly narrowing it. "How open-minded are you" weaponizes identity; stacked "three options" disguise a recommendation as a menu; "it works great" verges on evasion. Jones anticipates the charge, insisting the phrases help the chronically indecisive commit to what they already wanted. That defense holds when the seller genuinely believes the product serves the buyer, and collapses when it does not. The book offers no bright line between catalysis and coercion beyond the practitioner's conscience.
The deeper takeaway transcends any single phrase: language is not decoration on a decision, it is part of the machinery. Jones's real contribution is treating everyday speech as a trainable skill rather than an innate gift. His closing caveat, that these work with most people most of the time and demand relentless repetition, is refreshingly unhyped for a book that opens with the promise of magic.
Review Summary
Exactly What to Say received mixed reviews. Many readers found it helpful for improving sales techniques and communication skills, praising its concise format and practical phrases. However, some criticized it as manipulative and overly focused on sales tactics. Positive reviews highlighted its usefulness in various situations, while negative reviews expressed concerns about ethical implications. The book's short length was seen as both a strength and weakness, with some appreciating its brevity and others feeling it lacked depth. Overall, opinions varied widely based on readers' perspectives and intended applications.
People Also Read
FAQ
What's "Exactly What to Say" about?
- Focus on Communication: "Exactly What to Say" by Phil M. Jones is centered on the art of spoken communication and the impact of using the right words at the right time.
- Influence and Persuasion: The book provides tactical insights into how specific phrases can influence and persuade others effectively.
- Practical Tools: It offers practical tools and strategies for individuals who are driven to achieve success by improving their communication skills.
- Real-World Application: The book is designed to be applicable in both personal and professional settings, helping readers to get more of what they want from their interactions.
Why should I read "Exactly What to Say"?
- Improve Communication Skills: The book is a guide to mastering the art of communication, which is essential in both personal and professional life.
- Achieve Better Outcomes: By learning the magic words, readers can influence others more effectively and achieve desired outcomes.
- Practical and Actionable: The advice is simple, easy to implement, and proven to work, making it a valuable resource for anyone looking to enhance their persuasive abilities.
- Broad Applicability: Whether you're in sales, management, or any role that involves interaction with others, the book's lessons are universally applicable.
What are the key takeaways of "Exactly What to Say"?
- Magic Words: The book introduces specific phrases that can influence the subconscious mind and lead to better communication outcomes.
- Timing and Delivery: Knowing not just what to say, but when and how to say it, is crucial for effective persuasion.
- Rejection-Free Approach: Techniques are provided to introduce ideas without fear of rejection, increasing the likelihood of acceptance.
- Influence with Integrity: The book emphasizes influencing others with integrity, ensuring that persuasion is ethical and respectful.
How does Phil M. Jones define "Magic Words"?
- Subconscious Influence: Magic Words are phrases that speak directly to the subconscious brain, which is decisive and quick to respond.
- Decision-Making Tool: These words help in making decisions without overanalyzing, providing a fair advantage in conversations.
- Proven Effectiveness: The words are tried, tested, and proven to deliver results when used correctly.
- Simple Yet Powerful: Despite their simplicity, these words can significantly impact the outcome of conversations.
What are some examples of Magic Words from "Exactly What to Say"?
- "I'm Not Sure If It's for You, But": This phrase introduces ideas in a rejection-free manner, increasing curiosity and interest.
- "How Open-Minded Are You?": This question encourages people to consider new ideas by appealing to their desire to be open-minded.
- "What Do You Know?": This phrase challenges the knowledge base of someone who is resistant, prompting them to reconsider their stance.
- "Just Imagine": This phrase helps create vivid mental images, making it easier for others to envision and accept new ideas.
How can "Exactly What to Say" help in sales?
- Overcome Objections: The book provides strategies to handle common objections and regain control of conversations.
- Close More Deals: By using the right words, sales professionals can guide prospects toward making decisions more effectively.
- Build Rapport: The techniques help in building trust and rapport with clients, making them more receptive to proposals.
- Increase Influence: Salespeople can become more influential by understanding and applying the principles of persuasion outlined in the book.
What are the best quotes from "Exactly What to Say" and what do they mean?
- "The worst time to think of the best thing to say is always when you’re actually saying it!" This highlights the importance of preparation in communication.
- "Magic Words are sets of words that talk straight to the subconscious brain." This emphasizes the power of specific phrases in influencing decisions.
- "If you want to sell more and influence better and take much less time doing it, then this book is as close as you’ll get to a magic wand or silver bullet to success!" This quote underscores the book's potential to transform communication effectiveness.
- "Everything you have learned in this book is simple, easy to do and works." This reassures readers of the practicality and effectiveness of the advice given.
How does Phil M. Jones suggest handling objections?
- Regain Control: Treat objections as questions and respond with questions to maintain control of the conversation.
- Use "What Makes You Say That?": This phrase prompts the other person to explain their objection, providing more information to address it.
- Avoid Arguments: Instead of countering objections with arguments, seek to understand the underlying reasons.
- Encourage Transparency: By asking questions, you encourage the other person to be more transparent about their concerns.
What is the "rejection-free" approach in "Exactly What to Say"?
- Non-Pressuring Introduction: Use phrases like "I'm not sure if it's for you, but..." to introduce ideas without pressure.
- Increase Curiosity: This approach naturally increases the listener's curiosity and interest in the proposal.
- Internal Decision-Making: It encourages the listener to make an internal decision without feeling coerced.
- Effective for Any Audience: This method can be used with anyone, making it versatile and widely applicable.
How can "Exactly What to Say" be applied in personal life?
- Enhance Relationships: Use the techniques to improve communication and understanding in personal relationships.
- Influence Decisions: Apply the principles to influence family and friends in a positive and ethical manner.
- Resolve Conflicts: The book's strategies can help in resolving conflicts by fostering better communication.
- Achieve Personal Goals: By mastering the art of persuasion, individuals can achieve personal goals more effectively.
What is the significance of the phrase "Just Imagine" in "Exactly What to Say"?
- Create Mental Images: "Just Imagine" helps create vivid mental images that make it easier for others to envision new ideas.
- Influence Decisions: By painting a picture of the future, this phrase can influence decisions and motivate action.
- Engage Emotions: It engages the listener's emotions, making the proposal more compelling and memorable.
- Versatile Application: This phrase can be used in various contexts, from sales pitches to personal conversations.
How does "Exactly What to Say" address the fear of rejection?
- Rejection-Free Phrases: The book provides phrases that introduce ideas without the fear of rejection, making it easier to propose new concepts.
- Build Confidence: By using these techniques, individuals can build confidence in their communication skills.
- Increase Acceptance: The strategies increase the likelihood of acceptance by reducing the pressure on the listener.
- Practical Examples: The book offers practical examples of how to use these phrases in real-life situations, making it easier to apply the advice.
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
