Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Girl on Girl

Girl on Girl

How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves
by Sophie Gilbert 2025 352 pages
4.19
318 ratings
Listen
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Unlock listening & more!
Continue

Key Takeaways

1. Pop Culture Defined Female Power as Sexual and Commodifiable

What was obvious to me was that power, for women, was sexual in nature.

Early signals. By 1999, pop culture events like Britney Spears's Rolling Stone cover, a naked image of Gail Porter projected onto Parliament, and the film American Beauty suggested that power for young women was primarily sexual, fleeting, and tied to attention. This wasn't power accrued through education or experience, but through youth and a willingness to be in on the joke, even as the punchline.

Sexual currency. This era fetishized a specific kind of female power rooted in sexuality, implying there was no other kind worth having. Popular culture on the cusp of the 21st century seemed suffused with a winking irony, yet the underlying message was clear: women's value and influence were inextricably linked to their sexual presentation and desirability. This set a tone for how a generation of women would perceive themselves and each other.

Internalized message. Growing up in this environment, millennial women internalized the idea that sex was their primary currency and objectification was somehow empowering. This cultural conditioning colored ambitions, self-perception, relationships, and even bodies, leading to a belief in inadequacy and a questioning of who was setting this agenda.

2. Postfeminism Co-opted Liberation to Sell a Narrow Femininity

Postfeminism was vague; it seemed to define itself mostly in opposition to a boogeyman version of feminism, encouraging women to embrace casual sex, spend with abandon, and be as stereotypically girly or overtly sexy as they desired.

Reaction to activism. Emerging in the 1980s and 90s, postfeminism wasn't a clear ideology but a media-driven mechanism reacting against feminist activism. It fostered a sense that earlier feminist waves inhibited freedom, leading younger women to disavow feminism while benefiting from its achievements.

Selling empowerment. This movement insisted that individual choices, like embracing casual sex or hyper-feminine styles, were inherently empowering. This co-option of words like "liberation" and "choice" was used to sell women a narrow, sexualized vision of femininity, often embodied by figures like Carrie Bradshaw or the Spice Girls, whose "Girl Power" slogan became a commercialized, apolitical brand.

Blunting progress. Mass culture efficiently blunted the energy of third-wave feminism, which aimed for inclusivity and social change. Instead of collective struggle, postfeminism promoted selective upward mobility and rampant consumerism, redefining feminism as an individual pursuit focused on presenting oneself correctly and hustling.

3. Pornographic Aesthetics Pervaded Mainstream Media and Fashion

Porn’s dominance in popular culture came much like Ernest Hemingway’s description of bankruptcy: first gradually, then suddenly.

From taboo to trend. Following the AIDS crisis, explicit representations of sex became less taboo, embraced as a spectator sport. Fashion photography, in particular, began experimenting with transgression, leading to the "porno chic" aesthetic of the early 2000s, where elements of porn were recontextualized in art, fashion, and advertising.

Pervasive influence. By the aughts, pornographic imagery and tropes were absorbed into mainstream culture, from music videos (Christina Aguilera's "Dirrty") to fashion (visible G-strings, Abercrombie & Fitch marketing) and art (Terry Richardson's Terryworld). This wasn't just about showing sex, but adopting porn's flat lighting, affectless subjects, and focus on objectification.

Reclaiming old dynamics. While presented as liberating, this trend often repackaged old power dynamics. The same people who controlled images of women commodified porn's aesthetics, reinforcing the idea that women were objects for male desire. This intensified the pressure on women to conform to narrow, sexualized standards, often with detrimental effects.

4. Reality TV Normalized Surveillance and Sexual Objectification of Women

Visibility is a trap.

Human zoo. Early reality TV, like Jennicam and Big Brother, presented itself as a sociological experiment, a "virtual human zoo" where people's lives were constantly monitored. This gratified voyeuristic impulses, blurring the lines between public and private life and preparing audiences for an era of constant self-exposure.

Conflicting impulses. Reality TV was defined by the collision of voyeurism and traditionalism. While women were encouraged to be passive housewives, they were also expected to perform sexuality for ratings. Shows like Real Sex and Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire? commodified women, presenting their value as tied to their desirability and willingness to compete for male attention.

Reinforcing stereotypes. The genre often reinforced harmful stereotypes, portraying women as hysterical, gold-digging, or untrustworthy. Women of color faced additional typecasting and fetishization. Visibility on reality TV presented a paradox: being seen often meant conforming to narrow, objectifying roles, yet not being seen meant invisibility in a burgeoning media landscape.

5. Beauty Standards Became Homogenized, Plasticized, and Linked to Value

Only one standard of female beauty is sanctioned: the girl.

Makeover culture. Makeover reality shows like The Swan promoted cosmetic surgery as a path to self-improvement and happiness. These shows relentlessly emphasized that there was only one way for women to look: intensely feminine, straight, sexy, and often White, with any signs of difference erased.

Purchasable perfection. The aughts saw a boom in cosmetic procedures, presenting physical transformation as a status symbol and an emblem of consumption. Beauty was understood not just as reflecting inner identity, but as the predominant source of a woman's social and economic value, reinforcing the idea that looking beautiful was how you made money.

Shame and conformity. This era was marked by intense fat-shaming and body scrutiny in media, using shame to encourage conformity to unattainable ideals. Celebrities were constantly judged on their appearance, and ordinary women internalized these standards, leading to disordered eating and a focus on self-maintenance as a primary project.

6. Misogyny and Sexual Violence Were Increasingly Normalized in Media

Porn does not inform, or debate, or persuade. Porn trains.

Training culture. As porn became more accessible and its aesthetics permeated mainstream media, it trained culture to see women as objects. This contributed to the normalization of misogynistic and sexually violent content in music, film, and other forms of entertainment.

Extreme content. The post-9/11 era saw the rise of genres like "torture porn" in film, reflecting anxieties through gratuitous violence and degradation. Simultaneously, the porn industry itself shifted towards more extreme content (gonzo porn), pushing boundaries to maintain its transgressive status as mainstream culture adopted its earlier tropes.

Real-world impact. This cultural shift had real-world consequences. Studies linked exposure to misogynistic lyrics to negative attitudes towards women. The language and scenarios from extreme porn filtered into mainstream discourse and even allegedly into acts of violence and abuse, demonstrating how cultural representations can shape behavior and perceptions of power.

7. Gossip Culture Fueled Public Disdain and Dehumanization of Famous Women

How do we not see that the treatment of It Girls translates to the treatment of all girls in our culture?

Feverish scrutiny. Post-9/11, celebrity media exploded, offering distraction but also unprecedented scrutiny of famous women. Tabloids and blogs like Perez Hilton and TMZ fueled a nonstop cycle of updates, often focusing on stars' breakdowns, addictions, and personal struggles.

Cruelty and dehumanization. This constant, often aggressive coverage, including upskirt photos and public shaming, had a dehumanizing effect. Women were treated less like human beings and more like characters in a soap opera, symbols of decadent decline available for public dissection and ridicule.

Disgust as a weapon. Disgust, a powerful human response, was weaponized against women in the public eye, from politicians to pop stars. This mirrored historical patterns of associating women and their bodies with impurity, making it easier to dismiss, condemn, and dehumanize them.

8. Female Artists Used Confessional Narratives to Reclaim Agency

If I tell the story, I control the version.

Reclaiming narrative. In the early 2010s, a new wave of female artists and writers used confessional narratives and autofiction (like Lena Dunham's Tiny Furniture and Girls, Sheila Heti's How Should a Person Be?, Issa Rae's Awkward Black Girl) to reclaim agency over their own stories. After a decade of women's lives being appropriated and distorted by media, telling their own versions became an act of self-preservation.

Challenging norms. These works often explored themes of sexual humiliation, arrested development, and the absurdity of postfeminist expectations with frankness and dark humor. They pushed back against idealized portrayals of womanhood and challenged the male gaze by presenting female bodies and experiences in unglamorous, often uncomfortable ways.

Facing backlash. This new wave of female-centered art faced significant backlash, often dismissed as narcissistic or overly personal. However, by centering female experience and grappling with the complexities of sex, power, and identity in a media-saturated world, these artists paved the way for more diverse and honest storytelling.

9. The "Girlboss" Era Prioritized Individual Ambition and Consumption

The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.

Hustle culture. In the aftermath of the 2008 recession and the rise of Instagram, hustle culture became necessary. Instagram rewarded self-presentation and consumption, enabling women to turn personal branding into lucrative side hustles or even careers, often through influencer marketing and selling products.

Individual ascension. The "girlboss" phenomenon embodied this era, promoting young, mediagenic female entrepreneurs as symbols of success. This ideology, echoing postfeminism and Lean In, focused on individual women climbing the corporate ladder or building business empires, often through beauty or fashion brands, rather than advocating for systemic change.

Capitalism over feminism. This movement often co-opted feminist language ("empowerment," "hustle") to sell products and lifestyles, capitalizing on women's desire for success and self-improvement. However, it largely ignored structural inequalities and often relied on exploitative practices, ultimately serving capitalist ends more than collective feminist progress.

10. Cultural Narratives Reduced Women Seeking Power to Caricatures

Ever since, women running for office have tended to fall into the same traps that Clinton and Palin stumbled into.

Limited archetypes. Western culture has a deep-seated separation between women and power, reflected in narratives that silence or diminish women in positions of authority. When women do seek power, they are often reduced to limited archetypes or sexual caricatures.

Political objectification. The ascent of women like Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in the aughts was met with immediate sexualization and dehumanizing attacks in media and politics. Despite their differing ideologies, both faced scrutiny of their bodies, personal lives, and perceived femininity, reinforcing the idea that a woman's value is primarily sexual, even in the political sphere.

Enduring traps. This pattern continues, with women in politics facing similar attacks that question their competence, morality, and dignity based on gendered stereotypes. The cultural conditioning of decades, which presented women as objects or "trainwrecks," makes it harder for voters to see them as capable leaders, demonstrating how cultural narratives can hinder real-world progress.

11. Understanding This History Is Crucial for Rewriting Narratives of Female Power

Re-vision—the act of looking back, of
[ERROR: Incomplete response]

Last updated:

Want to read the full book?

FAQ

1. What is Girl on Girl: How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves by Sophie Gilbert about?

  • Pop culture’s impact on women: The book explores how pop culture from the 1990s to the 2010s shaped millennial women’s self-perception, relationships, and identities.
  • Media and female representation: It analyzes how women were portrayed in music, TV, film, magazines, and social media, and how these portrayals influenced societal expectations and personal ambitions.
  • Historical and cultural context: Gilbert situates these trends within broader movements like postfeminism, the riot grrrl movement, and the #MeToo era, revealing how culture both empowered and constrained women.
  • Call for narrative change: Ultimately, the book urges a rewriting of cultural narratives around female power, ambition, and solidarity.

2. Why should I read Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert?

  • Nuanced cultural analysis: The book offers a comprehensive, critical look at how pop culture both empowered and limited women, making it essential for anyone interested in feminism, media, or cultural history.
  • Insight into millennial womanhood: Readers gain a deeper understanding of the forces shaping contemporary issues around female identity, empowerment, and self-perception.
  • Encourages critical thinking: By exposing the mechanisms behind media messages, Gilbert empowers readers to question and resist harmful narratives about women and power.
  • Relevance to current debates: The book’s discussions on postfeminism, #MeToo, and the resurgence of misogyny are timely and vital for activists, creators, and consumers.

3. What are the key takeaways from Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert?

  • Pop culture’s double-edged sword: Media offered both opportunities and limitations for women, often packaging empowerment in ways that reinforced traditional gender norms.
  • Postfeminism’s paradox: The rise of postfeminism encouraged individualism and consumerism, but often sidelined collective activism and masked ongoing objectification.
  • Reality TV and social media: These platforms democratized fame and self-presentation but also intensified pressures around appearance, competition, and self-surveillance.
  • Need for new narratives: Gilbert calls for more diverse, authentic portrayals of women’s power and ambition to challenge ingrained cultural assumptions.

4. What is postfeminism according to Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert?

  • Media-driven sensibility: Postfeminism is described as a cultural attitude, not a political movement, that emerged in the 1980s and 1990s, promoting individualism, consumerism, and sexualized femininity.
  • Opposition to traditional feminism: It often defined itself against a caricature of feminism, encouraging women to embrace consumer culture and sexual availability as empowerment.
  • Cultural saturation: By the late 1990s, postfeminist ideals had permeated media, replacing collective activism with personal choice and upward mobility.
  • Critique of “empowerment”: Gilbert is skeptical of how “empowerment” is used in postfeminist contexts, arguing it often disguises continued objectification.

5. How does Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert describe the influence of pornography on mainstream culture?

  • Pervasive cultural force: Pornography is depicted as a defining product of the era, shaping music, fashion, art, and even politics.
  • Training effect: The book argues that porn conditions audiences to see women as objects for male pleasure, normalizing violence and degradation.
  • Mainstream adoption: Porn’s aesthetics and values filtered into mainstream media, blurring boundaries between art, commerce, and explicit sexual imagery.
  • Impact on activism: Self-objectification, promoted by both postfeminism and porn, is linked to decreased activism and social justice engagement among women.

6. How did music in the 1990s and 2000s shape feminism and misogyny according to Girl on Girl?

  • Feminist music in the 1990s: Artists like Madonna, Janet Jackson, and riot grrrl bands challenged misogyny and asserted feminist ideals.
  • Backlash and sidelining: By the late 1990s, feminist voices were replaced by younger, less opinionated pop stars and a surge of misogynistic music genres.
  • Hip-hop feminism: Female artists like Queen Latifah and Salt-N-Pepa offered counter-narratives but were often overshadowed by sexist rap culture.
  • 2000s sexualization: The rise of teen pop idols and the increasing sexualization of young female stars reflected and reinforced postfeminist ideals.

7. What role did reality television play in shaping women’s cultural narratives in Girl on Girl?

  • Commodification of femininity: Reality TV in the 2000s promoted hyperfeminine ideals and self-surveillance, reinforcing postfeminist sensibilities.
  • Competition and spectacle: Shows like The Bachelor and Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire? reduced women to competitors for male attention and wealth.
  • Visibility paradox: Reality TV increased women’s visibility but often trapped them in roles emphasizing appearance, rivalry, and emotional excess.
  • Racialized stereotypes: Programs featuring women of color often perpetuated harmful stereotypes, limiting authentic representation.

8. How does Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert address beauty standards and body image in the 2000s?

  • Transformation obsession: The 2000s saw a boom in cosmetic surgery and makeover shows, promoting a homogenized, hyperfeminine ideal.
  • Diet culture and fatphobia: Intense fat-shaming, diet fads, and media scrutiny of women’s bodies were rampant, reinforcing harmful messages about weight and worth.
  • Kardashian influence: The Kardashian family redefined beauty ideals around curvaceousness and cosmetic enhancement, shaping global standards.
  • Intersection with race: Shifts in beauty ideals included the fetishization of ethnically marked bodies, raising issues of colorism and cultural appropriation.

9. What are the key cultural concepts discussed in Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert?

  • Postfeminism and its paradox: The book explores how postfeminism encouraged empowerment through consumerism and self-surveillance, yet reinforced traditional gender norms.
  • Confessional auteur and autofiction: Gilbert highlights women creators who used confessional storytelling to reclaim female narratives and challenge sanitized myths.
  • Girlboss culture: The rise and critique of entrepreneurial feminism focused on individual success and branding, often ignoring systemic inequalities.
  • Media’s double-edged influence: The book examines how media both empowered and constrained women, shaping gender politics and self-perception.

10. How does Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert explore the impact of the #MeToo movement and confessional writing?

  • Confessional writing as empowerment: The book traces a resurgence of first-person narratives by women, reclaiming control over their stories and exposing vulnerabilities.
  • #MeToo’s significance: Gilbert situates #MeToo as a culmination of increased visibility and validation of women’s testimonies about harassment and abuse.
  • Backlash and risks: Women who speak out often face skepticism, harassment, and professional risks, highlighting the movement’s incomplete progress.
  • Persistent misogynoir: The book discusses cases like Megan Thee Stallion’s to illustrate ongoing backlash, especially against women of color.

11. What critique does Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert offer about "girlboss" culture and female entrepreneurship?

  • Commodification of feminism: "Girlboss" culture repackaged feminism as a marketable brand focused on individual success and consumerism, often ignoring structural barriers.
  • Rise and fall of girlbosses: Figures like Sophia Amoruso and Emily Weiss became icons but faced criticism for workplace practices and lack of inclusivity.
  • MLM schemes and exploitation: The book connects girlboss culture to multi-level marketing schemes that exploit women’s networks and aspirations.
  • Limited transformative power: Gilbert argues that girlbosses were often symbolic rather than agents of broad, systemic change.

12. What hopeful perspectives and solutions does Girl on Girl by Sophie Gilbert offer for rewriting women’s stories and power?

  • Cultural re-vision as survival: Drawing on Adrienne Rich, Gilbert emphasizes the importance of challenging ingrained assumptions about women and power through art and storytelling.
  • Emergence of diverse voices: The book highlights new media and creators who offer more nuanced, authentic portrayals of women’s experiences and ambitions.
  • Expanding representation: Gilbert calls for more complex, humanized portrayals of female leaders and creators to change societal expectations.
  • Path to genuine change: Rewriting narratives is presented as essential for expanding possibilities and achieving real progress for women.

Review Summary

4.19 out of 5
Average of 318 ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

Girl on Girl receives widespread praise for its insightful analysis of pop culture's impact on women, especially millennials. Readers appreciate Gilbert's examination of misogyny in music, reality TV, and social media. Many find the book eye-opening, nostalgic, and compulsively readable. Some note its overwhelming and anxiety-inducing content but commend its importance. The book is lauded for its accessible writing style and thorough research. Critics mention its abrupt ending and occasional repetitiveness. Overall, it's highly recommended for its powerful exploration of how media has shaped women's perceptions of themselves and each other.

Your rating:
4.56
38 ratings

About the Author

Sophie Gilbert is a British writer and staff member at The Atlantic. As an elder Millennial, her experiences align with the time period she focuses on in "Girl on Girl." Gilbert's journalistic background is evident in her thorough research and analysis of pop culture trends. Her writing style is described as savvy, punchy, and informative, making complex topics accessible to readers. Gilbert's work demonstrates a deep understanding of feminist issues and their intersection with media. Her ability to critically examine cultural touchstones resonates with readers, particularly those who grew up during the era she discusses. Gilbert's perspective as both a cultural critic and a woman who lived through the period adds authenticity to her work.

Download PDF

To save this Girl on Girl summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.32 MB     Pages: 14

Download EPUB

To read this Girl on Girl summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 2.95 MB     Pages: 13
Listen
Now playing
Girl on Girl
0:00
-0:00
Now playing
Girl on Girl
0:00
-0:00
1x
Voice
Speed
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Queue
Home
Swipe
Library
Get App
Create a free account to unlock:
Recommendations: Personalized for you
Requests: Request new book summaries
Bookmarks: Save your favorite books
History: Revisit books later
Ratings: Rate books & see your ratings
200,000+ readers
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Listen, bookmark, and more
Compare Features Free Pro
📖 Read Summaries
Read unlimited summaries. Free users get 3 per month
🎧 Listen to Summaries
Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 4
📜 Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 4
📥 Unlimited Downloads
Free users are limited to 1
Risk-Free Timeline
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Aug 24,
cancel anytime before.
Consume 2.8x More Books
2.8x more books Listening Reading
Our users love us
200,000+ readers
"...I can 10x the number of books I can read..."
"...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented..."
"...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision..."
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/year
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Start a 7-Day Free Trial
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Scanner
Find a barcode to scan

38% OFF
DISCOUNT FOR YOU
$79.99
$49.99/year
only $4.16 per month
Continue
2 taps to start, super easy to cancel
Settings
General
Widget
Loading...