Facebook Pixel
Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Good Strategy Bad Strategy

Good Strategy Bad Strategy

The Difference and Why It Matters
by Richard Rumelt 2011 336 pages
4.14
14k+ ratings
Listen
9 minutes

Key Takeaways

1. Good strategy is unexpected and leverages coherent action

A good strategy has an essential logical structure that I call the kernel. The kernel of a strategy contains three elements: a diagnosis, a guiding policy, and coherent action.

Diagnosis is key. Good strategy begins with a clear-eyed assessment of the challenge at hand. This diagnosis simplifies complex realities by identifying critical aspects of the situation. The guiding policy then outlines an overall approach to overcome the obstacles identified in the diagnosis. Finally, coherent action involves coordinated steps designed to support the guiding policy.

Unexpected power. Effective strategies often gain advantage because rivals don't anticipate them. This element of surprise comes from insightful diagnosis and creative problem-solving, not just from secrecy. Good strategies coordinate policies and actions in ways that create a competitive punch or powerful problem-solving effect.

Examples of good strategy:

  • Hannibal's victory at Cannae: Anticipated Roman behavior and designed coordinated actions
  • Walmart's retail strategy: Integrated network of stores, distribution centers, and information systems
  • Apple's turnaround under Steve Jobs: Simplified product line and focused on design and user experience

2. Bad strategy masks the absence of clear goals with fluffy language

Bad strategy follows the crowd, substituting popular slogans for insights.

Hallmarks of bad strategy:

  • Fluff: Excessive use of buzzwords and jargon to hide lack of substance
  • Failure to face the challenge: Avoiding the hard work of identifying and analyzing obstacles
  • Mistaking goals for strategy: Stating desires without a plan to overcome difficulties
  • Bad strategic objectives: Impractical or incoherent goals that fail to address critical issues

Common causes of bad strategy:

  • Unwillingness to make tough choices
  • Reliance on template-style strategy formulation
  • Overemphasis on "vision" without concrete plans
  • New Thought-style positive thinking that ignores real-world obstacles

Bad strategy often arises from organizational inertia, political compromises, or leaders' desire to please everyone. It can also stem from a misunderstanding of what strategy actually is, confusing it with goal-setting or financial forecasts.

3. Sources of power in strategy: leverage, proximate objectives, and design

To achieve leverage, the strategist must have insight into a pivot point that will magnify the effects of focused energy and resources.

Leverage involves identifying and exploiting pivot points where concentrated effort can produce outsized results. This requires deep understanding of the situation and creative problem-solving to find unexpected advantages.

Proximate objectives are goals that are close enough at hand to be feasible. They provide clear direction and help coordinate problem-solving efforts. Good proximate objectives break down larger challenges into manageable steps.

Design in strategy involves creating a cohesive configuration of resources and actions that yields advantage. Like designing a high-performance machine, good strategic design coordinates multiple elements to work together efficiently.

Key elements of strategic design:

  • Mutual adjustment of parts
  • Focus on critical interactions
  • Balance between integration and flexibility
  • Adaptation to competitive context

4. Effective strategies exploit waves of change and industry transitions

To generate a strategy, one must put aside the comfort and security of pure deduction and launch into the murkier waters of induction, analogy, judgment, and insight.

Riding waves of change. Successful strategies often capitalize on broader trends and transitions in technology, markets, or regulations. This requires leaders to develop a keen sense for emerging patterns and the ability to anticipate second-order effects.

Identifying inflection points. Strategic opportunities often arise during periods of significant industry change. These inflection points can upset existing competitive positions and enable new strategies.

Examples of strategic exploitation of change:

  • Cisco Systems' rise in networking equipment
  • Apple's transformation of the music industry with iTunes and iPod
  • Amazon's pioneering of e-commerce and cloud computing

Attractor states. Understanding the long-term equilibrium state an industry is moving towards can provide valuable strategic insight. This concept helps leaders distinguish between temporary fluctuations and fundamental shifts in industry structure.

5. Inertia and entropy are major obstacles to strategic change

Even with change programs running at full throttle, it can take many years to alter a large company's basic functioning.

Types of organizational inertia:

  • Inertia of routine: Entrenched processes and habits resist change
  • Cultural inertia: Deeply held beliefs and values impede adaptation
  • Inertia by proxy: Stakeholders' resistance to change affects the organization

Entropy in organizations refers to the tendency for order and focus to degrade over time without active maintenance. This requires leaders to constantly work on reinforcing purpose, structure, and methods.

Overcoming inertia and entropy:

  • Simplification: Strip away unnecessary complexity
  • Fragmentation: Break political coalitions and expose inefficiencies
  • Triage: Identify units to close, repair, or use as nuclei for new structures
  • Challenge: Set ambitious goals to build new habits and routines

Leaders must recognize that changing large organizations is an intensely strategic challenge requiring diagnosis, guiding policy, and coherent action.

6. Scientific thinking is crucial for developing and testing strategies

A strategy is, like a scientific hypothesis, an educated prediction of how the world works.

Strategy as hypothesis. Good strategies, like scientific theories, are testable predictions about what will work in a given situation. They should be based on careful observation and analysis, but also involve creative insight.

Empirical approach. Effective strategists, like good scientists, pay close attention to real-world results and are willing to revise their theories based on new evidence. This requires:

  • Careful observation of outcomes
  • Willingness to acknowledge and learn from failures
  • Continual refinement of strategic hypotheses

Importance of anomalies. Unexpected results or contradictions to prevailing wisdom often point to important strategic insights. Leaders should cultivate the ability to spot and investigate anomalies.

Proprietary information. Like scientific experiments, business operations generate valuable data. Strategists should design their organizations to capture and learn from this proprietary information.

7. Independent judgment is vital in strategy, especially during market bubbles

Being strategic is being less myopic—less shortsighted—than others.

Overcoming cognitive limitations. Good strategists develop techniques to counteract natural human biases and limitations in thinking. This includes:

  • Making lists to overcome forgetfulness and force prioritization
  • Using mental models and frameworks to structure complex problems
  • Cultivating a "panel of experts" to critique ideas

Dangers of social herding. During market bubbles or periods of excessive optimism, it's crucial for leaders to maintain independent judgment. This requires:

  • Understanding fundamental industry economics
  • Recognizing patterns from historical examples
  • Resisting the temptation to follow the crowd

Inside view vs. outside view. Strategists must balance the detailed knowledge of their specific situation (inside view) with broader patterns and statistics (outside view). Overreliance on the inside view can lead to overconfidence and failure to learn from relevant examples.

Practicing judgment. Good strategic thinking is a skill that can be developed through practice. Leaders should:

  • Commit judgments to writing before discussions
  • Evaluate the accuracy of past predictions
  • Continuously refine their ability to assess situations and make decisions

Last updated:

Review Summary

4.14 out of 5
Average of 14k+ ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

Good Strategy Bad Strategy offers a clear framework for developing effective strategies, distinguishing between good and bad approaches. Rumelt emphasizes the importance of diagnosis, guiding policy, and coherent action in crafting successful strategies. The book provides numerous real-world examples and case studies, illustrating both effective and ineffective strategies across various industries. Readers appreciate Rumelt's straightforward style and practical insights, though some find certain examples lengthy. Overall, it's considered a valuable resource for leaders, business owners, and decision-makers seeking to improve their strategic thinking and implementation.

Your rating:

About the Author

Richard Rumelt is a renowned expert in corporate strategy and management. His research focuses on corporate diversification, sustainable competitive advantage, and industry transitions. Rumelt received his doctorate from Harvard Business School and has been a faculty member at UCLA since 1976. He served as President of the Strategic Management Society and received the Irwin Prize for his book "Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance." Rumelt has also held prestigious positions such as Telecom Italia Strategy Fellow and has won teaching awards at UCLA. His work has significantly influenced the field of strategic management, earning him recognition as one of the most influential contemporary management thinkers.

Download PDF

To save this Good Strategy Bad Strategy summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.24 MB     Pages: 10

Download EPUB

To read this Good Strategy Bad Strategy summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 2.99 MB     Pages: 9
0:00
-0:00
1x
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
Select Speed
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Create a free account to unlock:
Bookmarks – save your favorite books
History – revisit books later
Ratings – rate books & see your ratings
Unlock unlimited listening
Your first week's on us!
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Nov 21,
cancel anytime before.
Compare Features Free Pro
Read full text summaries
Summaries are free to read for everyone
Listen to summaries
12,000+ hours of audio
Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 10
Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 10
What our users say
30,000+ readers
“...I can 10x the number of books I can read...”
“...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented...”
“...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision...”
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/yr
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Try Free & Unlock
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Settings
Appearance