Key Takeaways
1. US Foreign Policy Prioritizes Self-Interest Over Idealism
Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity....To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and daydreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives.
Kennan's Realism. George Kennan, a key figure in shaping post-WWII US foreign policy, advocated for a pragmatic approach that prioritized US national interests above vague ideals like human rights and democratization. This perspective, outlined in Policy Planning Study 23 (PPS 23), reflected a belief that the US, with its disproportionate share of global wealth, would inevitably face envy and resentment, necessitating a focus on maintaining its dominant position through power concepts rather than idealistic slogans.
Raw Materials Protection. Kennan's policies extended to Latin America, where he emphasized the protection of US access to raw materials. He viewed any notion of governments having a direct responsibility for the welfare of their people as a dangerous heresy, equating it with communism. This perspective justified interventions aimed at suppressing movements that challenged US economic interests, even if it meant supporting repressive regimes.
Historical Roots. This approach wasn't new. Woodrow Wilson's Secretary of State had already articulated the Monroe Doctrine as prioritizing US interests, with the integrity of other American nations being merely incidental. Wilson himself acted on this principle by invading Haiti and the Dominican Republic, demonstrating a long-standing pattern of US foreign policy driven by self-interest rather than altruism.
2. The Grand Area Strategy Subordinates the World to US Economic Needs
The Third World was to “fulfill its major function as a source of raw materials and a market” for the industrial capitalist societies...
Post-War Planning. During World War II, US planners envisioned a "Grand Area" that would be subordinated to the needs of the American economy. This area encompassed the Western Hemisphere, Western Europe, the Far East, and the Middle East, with the Third World serving as a source of raw materials and a market for industrial societies. This strategy aimed to ensure US dominance in the post-war world.
Division of Labor. The plan assigned specific functions to different regions. Germany and Japan were designated as "great workshops" under US supervision, while the Third World was to be "exploited" for the reconstruction of Europe and Japan. This division of labor reflected a hierarchical view of the global order, with the US at the apex.
Vietnam War Example. The Vietnam War emerged from the need to enforce this service role. Vietnamese nationalists' desire for independence was seen as a threat to the Grand Area strategy, necessitating military intervention to suppress their aspirations. The US government's role was to secure the Grand Area and subsidize high-technology industry, often through military spending.
3. Suppression of Democracy Abroad Ensures Investor Rights
We’ve consistently opposed democracy if its results can’t be controlled.
Controlled Democracy. US planners have consistently prioritized the interests of US investors over genuine democracy in the Third World. Democracy is only acceptable if its results can be controlled, ensuring that governments respond to the needs of US investors rather than their own populations. This often involves supporting authoritarian regimes that protect private enterprise.
Military Alliances. The US relies on force and alliances with the military in Third World countries to crush any indigenous popular groups that get out of hand. Social reforms are tolerated only when labor rights are suppressed and the climate for foreign investment is preserved. Excessive liberalism, such as governments being responsive to popular demands, is viewed as a threat.
Brutal Methods. The suppression of independent nationalism and meaningful democracy often involves brutal tactics, including torture and violence against civilians. The goal is to crush any opposition that might challenge the dominance of US investors and their allies. This approach reflects a commitment to private capitalist enterprise above all else.
4. The Threat of a Good Example Drives US Intervention
The weaker and poorer a country is, the more dangerous it is as an example.
Domino Theory. Even the smallest and poorest countries can pose a threat if they succeed in creating a better life for their people. This "good example" can inspire other nations to demand similar improvements, potentially disrupting the US-led global system. This fear drives US intervention, even in seemingly insignificant countries like Laos and Grenada.
Chile as a Virus. The US concern over Chile under Allende stemmed from the fear that its social democratic government would "infect" the region, inspiring voters in countries like Italy to demand similar changes. This "rotten apple theory" justifies intervention to prevent the spread of social and economic development.
Guatemala's Agrarian Reform. When Guatemala's democratic government implemented agrarian reform and aided workers and peasants, it was seen as a threat to the stability of neighboring countries. The US responded by engineering a coup to protect the interests of the upper classes and large foreign enterprises, demonstrating its willingness to undermine democracy to maintain stability.
5. The Cold War Served as a Tool for Domestic Control
Each superpower controlled its primary enemy—its own population—by terrifying it with the (quite real) crimes of the other.
Mutual Justification. The Cold War was a tacit arrangement between the US and the Soviet Union, where each side used the other's crimes to justify repression and violence within their own domains. The US used the Soviet threat to compel its population to subsidize high-tech industry, while the Soviet Union used the US threat to maintain its authoritarian rule.
Dismissing Peaceful Resolutions. The US dismissed possibilities for peaceful resolution of the Cold War conflict, which would have left the "political threat" intact. The "political" threat of so-called "Communism" was the primary concern.
New Enemies. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US needed to invent new enemies to maintain domestic control. The "war on drugs" and the threat of drug traffickers from Latin America became substitutes for the disappearing Evil Empire, providing a cover for intervention and increased repression.
6. Media Serves the Interests of Wealth and Power
The media are only one part of a larger doctrinal system; other parts are journals of opinion, the schools and universities, academic scholarship and so on.
Corporate Ownership. The major media outlets are large corporations owned by even larger conglomerates, selling audiences to advertisers. This structure inherently biases the media's portrayal of the world, reflecting the interests and values of the sellers, buyers, and the product itself.
Cultural Managers. Editors and leading columnists share class interests and associations with state and business managers, further reinforcing the media's alignment with power. The flow of high-level people among corporations, government, and media ensures a consistent perspective.
Doctrinal System. The media are part of a larger doctrinal system that includes journals of opinion, schools, universities, and academic scholarship. This system aims to control both the "political class" (the educated 20%) and the "bewildered herd" (the remaining 80%), diverting the masses and reinforcing basic social values like passivity and submissiveness to authority.
7. The US Exports a Capitalist Model It Doesn't Follow Itself
We don’t accept it for ourselves—but for the Third World, we insist on it.
IMF System. The US insists on imposing a capitalist model on the Third World that it doesn't accept for itself. This involves liberalization, opening economies to foreign penetration, and cutting back on services to the general population. These measures benefit wealthy classes and foreign investors while reinforcing inequality.
Pentagon System. The US has historically relied on the Pentagon system to subsidize high-tech industry and maintain its economic power. This involves public funding for research and development and a state-guaranteed market for waste production, a system of public subsidy and private profit that is called free enterprise.
Protectionism for the Rich. While advocating free trade for others, the US has often employed protectionist measures to benefit its own industries. This hypocrisy is evident in the US government's actions to ram tobacco down the throats of consumers in other countries while simultaneously fighting the drug trade.
8. The Third World Pays the Price for Western Prosperity
In a global economy designed for the interests and needs of international corporations and finance, and sectors that serve them, most people become superfluous.
Exploitation of Resources. The global economy is designed to benefit international corporations and finance, often at the expense of the Third World. This involves exploiting resources, cheap labor, and markets in developing countries, leading to environmental destruction and social inequality.
Debt and Austerity. The IMF imposes "liberalization" on Third World countries in return for loans, leading to sharp cutbacks in services to the general population and increased poverty. This indebtedness and economic chaos ensure that the IMF rules will be followed, perpetuating a cycle of exploitation.
Human Cost. The human cost of this system is staggering, with millions of children dying every year from easily curable diseases and vast numbers of people living in poverty and misery. The silent genocide is a direct result of prioritizing profit over human needs.
9. The Illusion of Choice Masks Systemic Inequality
To make sense of political discourse, it’s necessary to give a running translation into English, decoding the doublespeak of the media, academic social scientists and the secular priesthood generally.
Doctrinal Meaning. Political discourse often has two meanings: the dictionary meaning and a doctrinal meaning that serves power. Terms like "democracy," "free enterprise," and "defense against aggression" are often used to mean the opposite of their literal definitions.
Special Interests. The term "special interest" is used to denigrate groups like women, labor, and the elderly, while corporations are never listed as such. This reflects the view that corporate interests are the "national interest," to which all must bow.
Doublespeak. The function of this doublespeak is to make it impossible to talk about matters of human significance in a coherent way, ensuring that little is understood about how society works and what is happening in the world. This contributes to a "democracy" in which the public is merely a spectator.
10. The Struggle for Freedom Requires Constant Resistance
The struggle for freedom is never over.
Internal Disruption. The people of the Third World need our sympathetic understanding and, much more than that, they need our help. We can provide them with a margin of survival by internal disruption in the United States.
Courage and Inspiration. The courage shown by those fighting for freedom in the Third World is a moving and inspiring experience. It reminds us of the importance of preserving our own independence and resisting oppression.
Ongoing Task. The task before us includes addressing the growing Third World at home, challenging illegitimate authority, and protecting the environment. While success is not guaranteed, the lack of effort will spell disaster.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky about?
- Comprehensive critique of power: The book analyzes global political and economic power structures, focusing on US hegemony, corporate influence, and the decline of social contracts since the 1970s.
- Historical and contemporary analysis: Chomsky traces US actions from World War II through the 1990s, examining interventions, trade agreements, and the evolution of global capitalism.
- Media and propaganda: It explores how mainstream media shape public opinion and manufacture consent for elite-driven policies.
- Case studies and examples: The book uses detailed examples from Latin America, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and more to illustrate its arguments.
Why should I read "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky?
- Unveils hidden power dynamics: The book exposes mechanisms of global capitalism, US foreign policy, and corporate dominance often obscured in mainstream discourse.
- Challenges conventional wisdom: Chomsky questions accepted ideas about free trade, democracy, and media objectivity, encouraging critical thinking.
- Empowers activism: It provides historical context and practical advice for those interested in social change and grassroots resistance.
- Evidence-based analysis: The book is well-documented, with extensive references and case studies to support its claims.
What are the key takeaways from "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky?
- US dominance and decline: The US sought global dominance post-WWII, but since the 1970s, its economic hegemony has waned, leading to increased corporate power and inequality.
- Trade agreements favor elites: Deals like NAFTA and GATT primarily benefit investors and corporations, often at the expense of workers and social welfare.
- Media as a control tool: Mainstream media serve elite interests, manufacturing consent and limiting dissent.
- Grassroots resistance is essential: Real change requires organized, sustained activism rather than reliance on charismatic leaders or quick fixes.
How does Noam Chomsky define the main goals of US foreign policy in "How the World Works"?
- Maintaining global dominance: US policy aims to preserve control over global wealth and security, shaping the world to serve American economic interests.
- Suppressing independent nationalism: The US opposes countries pursuing independent development or social reform, often labeling them as threats.
- Supporting authoritarian regimes: Democracy is supported only when it aligns with US interests; otherwise, the US backs coups and dictatorships.
- Economic exploitation: US interventions often prioritize corporate profits and resource access over human rights or democracy.
How does "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky explain the role of media in society?
- Media as corporate product: Major media outlets are owned by large corporations and serve the interests of advertisers and elites.
- Propaganda and consent: The media system manufactures consent, keeping the public passive and reinforcing elite values.
- Five filters of news: News is filtered through ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, and anti-ideologies, narrowing the range of acceptable discourse.
- Marginalization of dissent: Alternative and grassroots media are often ignored or suppressed, limiting the impact of critical perspectives.
What is the "threat of a good example" in US foreign policy according to Noam Chomsky?
- Fear of inspiring independence: The US fears that successful social and economic reforms in small countries could inspire similar movements elsewhere.
- Crushing small nations: Even tiny countries like Grenada or Nicaragua face military invasions and economic warfare to prevent independent development.
- Domino theory reinterpreted: The real concern is not military conquest but the spread of successful models of national independence and social justice.
- Suppressing alternatives: The US acts to prevent any example that might challenge its preferred global order.
How does Noam Chomsky describe the impact of trade agreements like NAFTA and GATT in "How the World Works"?
- Benefits for the privileged: These agreements mainly help investors, professionals, and capital-intensive industries, while most workers face wage declines and job losses.
- Negative effects in Mexico: NAFTA led to a significant loss of manufacturing capacity and jobs in Mexico, with rural populations displaced by cheap US agricultural exports.
- Suppression of labor resistance: Corporations operate globally, but unions cannot, making it difficult for workers to resist downward pressure on wages.
- Media misrepresentation: Media and government present these agreements as universally beneficial, despite strong public opposition and negative outcomes for many.
What does "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky say about corporate power and capitalism?
- Corporations as totalitarian entities: Corporations are hierarchical, unaccountable, and prioritize profit over social welfare and democracy.
- Dependence on state support: Despite the myth of free markets, corporations rely heavily on government subsidies, protection, and legal privileges.
- Corporate welfare vs. social welfare: There is massive public support for corporations, while social programs for the poor are attacked and reduced.
- Global exploitation: Corporations exploit cheap labor, avoid regulations, and use offshore operations to deepen global inequality.
How does Noam Chomsky define "free enterprise" and "democracy" in "How the World Works"?
- Free enterprise as public subsidy: Chomsky argues that so-called free enterprise involves significant government intervention and public funding, with private profit as the goal.
- Democracy as limited participation: In practice, democracy means decisions are made by business elites, with the public relegated to passive spectatorship.
- Doublespeak in politics: Terms like democracy and free enterprise are often used to obscure real power structures and limit public understanding.
- Manipulation of language: Political discourse is shaped to serve elite interests, often meaning the opposite of what is publicly claimed.
What are some key examples of US interventions and their consequences discussed in "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky?
- Latin America: US-backed coups and terror in countries like Guatemala, El Salvador, and Nicaragua led to mass killings and economic devastation.
- Southeast Asia: The Vietnam War and support for regimes like Indonesia’s Suharto resulted in destroyed development and widespread suffering.
- Middle East and Gulf War: US support for Israel’s occupation and the Gulf War reveal power interests overriding principles and humanitarian claims.
- Global pattern: Interventions often serve economic and political interests, with humanitarian justifications masking strategic goals.
How does "How the World Works" by Noam Chomsky address the concept of democracy and its challenges?
- Democracy requires equality: Extreme wealth inequality undermines genuine democracy, as power becomes concentrated among the wealthy.
- US democracy as limited: The US system is structured to protect elite interests, with real participation and influence restricted for most citizens.
- Threats from corporate power: The rise of unaccountable corporations erodes public control and weakens democratic institutions.
- Need for participatory democracy: Chomsky advocates for expanding democratic participation and building grassroots movements to reclaim power.
What practical advice does Noam Chomsky offer in "How the World Works" for individuals seeking social change?
- Organize collectively: Individual efforts are limited; meaningful change requires joining unions, political parties, or grassroots organizations.
- Engage locally and globally: Participation in local activism and international solidarity movements helps build alternative institutions and networks.
- Educate and inform: Understanding power structures and sharing truthful information are crucial for effective resistance.
- Be patient and persistent: Social change is a long-term process, requiring sustained effort, learning, and incremental progress.
Review Summary
How the World Works is a collection of Chomsky's interviews and writings that offers scathing critiques of US foreign policy, capitalism, and corporate influence. Readers find his analyses insightful and eye-opening, praising his ability to explain complex issues clearly. Many consider it essential reading for understanding global politics and economics. While some note repetition and dated examples, most appreciate Chomsky's candid approach and thought-provoking ideas. The book is seen as accessible and important, though potentially depressing in its portrayal of power structures and societal issues.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub
digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.