Key Takeaways
1. Victorian Slums Sparked Council Housing
The constant was the failure of the free market and private enterprise to provide the healthy and affordable homes that ordinary people needed and deserved.
Filth and Fear. The appalling living conditions in Victorian slums, characterized by overcrowding, disease, and moral decay, prompted a wave of social reform. The fear of disease spreading to the middle classes, coupled with a growing sense of social responsibility, fueled the drive for better housing.
- Slums were described as "pestilential human rookeries" with death rates twice the London average.
- Reformers like William Booth and Andrew Mearns highlighted the squalor and immorality of these areas.
- The miasma theory, though incorrect, helped persuade the middle class of their own vulnerability.
Early Legislation and Action. Initial efforts focused on sanitation and public health, with Liverpool leading the way. The 1866 Labouring Classes Dwellings Act allowed municipalities to build working-class homes, but it was the 1890 Housing of the Working Classes Act that truly laid the foundation for council housing.
- Liverpool built the first council homes in 1869, the St Martin's Cottages.
- The 1890 Act required replacement housing in London after slum clearance.
- The LCC was formed in 1889, bringing together radical Liberals, Fabians, and labor leaders.
Arts and Crafts Influence. The Boundary Estate, Britain's first council estate, was a product of the Arts and Crafts movement, which sought to create dignified housing for working people. Architects like Owen Fleming rejected the austere "model dwellings" of private philanthropy, opting for a "picturesque urban village" with attention to design and build quality.
- The Boundary Estate included shops, schools, workshops, and a laundry.
- It was intended to be a green heart of a new community.
- However, rents were too high for the poorest, leading to displacement.
2. Interwar Housing: Scale and Retreat
The homes of Dover House are among the best of these and the estate was ‘a show place in its day … visited by many from all over the world’.
Homes for Heroes. The First World War created a housing crisis, leading to the 1919 Housing and Town Planning Act, which promised "homes for heroes." This act, also known as the Addison Act, mandated local councils to survey housing needs and implement plans to address them.
- The Dover House Estate exemplified the high standards of early post-war housing.
- The Becontree Estate in Dagenham was a massive undertaking, with 26,000 homes.
- The Tudor Walters Report set design standards for cottage-style homes with gardens.
Shifting Ideals and Austerity. The initial idealism of the post-war period was short-lived. The "Geddes Axe" of 1921 cut subsidies, leading to reduced space standards and a shift towards private housing. The 1923 and 1924 Housing Acts reflected this tension between state and private provision.
- The 1923 Act reduced space standards and subsidies.
- The 1924 Act, by John Wheatley, increased subsidies but maintained reduced space standards.
- The Wythenshawe Estate in Manchester was a large-scale attempt to build a Garden City.
Tenements and the Slum Problem. Despite the focus on cottage suburbs, the need to rehouse inner-city populations led to the construction of multi-story tenement blocks. The 1930 Housing Act incentivized slum clearance and the rehousing of those displaced.
- The Wilson Grove Estate in Bermondsey was a small, high-quality cottage estate.
- The LCC built many five-story, balcony-access flats in inner London.
- The 1935 Housing Act added overcrowding to the definition of unfit housing.
3. Post-War Planning: Idealism and Reality
If only we will.
Reimagining Britain. The Second World War provided an opportunity to reimagine Britain, with planning taking center stage. The destruction of cities like Plymouth led to comprehensive redevelopment plans, emphasizing community and modern design.
- Patrick Abercrombie's Plan for Plymouth aimed to create a "city of the future."
- The "neighbourhood unit" concept was introduced, with schools and community facilities.
- The war created a sense of social solidarity and a desire for a better world.
The County of London Plan. Abercrombie's County of London Plan proposed a green belt around the capital and the decentralization of population to new towns. The plan also emphasized the need for mixed communities and better housing for all.
- The plan proposed moving 500,000 people out of London.
- It advocated for a greater mingling of different social groups.
- It also introduced the concept of the neighbourhood unit.
New Towns and Suburban Estates. The post-war period saw the creation of new towns and suburban estates, intended to provide better housing and community facilities. However, these schemes were not without their critics.
- Debden and South Oxhey were examples of new suburban estates.
- Willmott and Young criticized the loss of community in these new developments.
- The New Towns Act of 1946 led to the creation of towns like Stevenage and Harlow.
4. 1950s-60s: High-Rise and System Building
‘Get these people out of the slums!’
The Push for High-Rise. The 1956 Housing Subsidies Act incentivized high-rise construction, leading to a boom in tower blocks. This was driven by a desire to rehouse slum populations quickly and efficiently, as well as by the belief that high-rise living was modern and progressive.
- Birmingham became known as "Saucer City" for its high-rise periphery.
- The 1956 Act provided higher subsidies for taller buildings.
- The LCC built its first high-rise block in Southfields.
System Building and its Flaws. To meet the demand for new housing, local authorities turned to system building, using prefabricated components. However, this approach often resulted in poor construction quality and structural defects.
- The Mackworth Estate in Derby used "No-Fines" concrete construction.
- The Quarry Hill Estate in Leeds was a large-scale system-built scheme.
- The Ronan Point collapse in 1968 exposed the dangers of system building.
Mixed Development and its Limits. The concept of mixed development, which combined different types of housing in a single scheme, gained popularity. However, the focus on high-rise often overshadowed the original ideals of community and social mix.
- The Lansbury Estate was a showcase for mixed development.
- The Churchill Gardens Estate in Westminster was another example.
- The Somerford Grove scheme in Hackney was a model for mixed development.
5. 1970s: A Shift to Human-Scale Design
‘anti-monumental, anti-stylistic, and fit for ordinary people’
Backlash Against High-Rise. The 1970s saw a growing backlash against high-rise housing and system building. Architects and planners began to prioritize human-scale design, with an emphasis on community and local context.
- The Hulme Crescents in Manchester were a failed attempt at high-density living.
- The Aylesbury Estate in Southwark became a symbol of the problems of system building.
- The focus shifted to rehabilitation and infill rather than large-scale redevelopment.
New Humanism and Vernacular Revival. Architects like Ted Hollamby and Kate Macintosh championed a more humanistic approach to housing design, drawing inspiration from traditional forms and materials. This led to a revival of vernacular styles and a greater emphasis on landscaping and open space.
- Dawson's Heights in Southwark was a notable example of this approach.
- The World's End Estate in Chelsea combined high-rise with a more human scale.
- The Byker Wall in Newcastle was a large-scale scheme with a focus on community.
The Parker Morris Report. The 1961 Parker Morris Report set new standards for space and amenities in council housing. This report, along with the 1969 Housing Act, reflected a growing emphasis on quality and design.
- The report recommended larger homes with better facilities.
- It also promoted the separation of cars and pedestrians.
- It was a response to the changing needs and expectations of residents.
6. Thatcher's Revolution: Right to Buy and Beyond
Since Mrs Thatcher’s introduction of Right to Buy in 1980 and the virtual cessation of new build since then, our social housing stock has diminished drastically.
Right to Buy. Margaret Thatcher's government introduced the Right to Buy policy in 1980, allowing council tenants to purchase their homes at a discount. This policy was hugely popular but led to a significant reduction in the social housing stock.
- Over 1.8 million council homes were sold by 1997.
- The policy was intended to create a property-owning democracy.
- It also led to a decline in the quality and availability of council housing.
Austerity and Privatization. The Thatcher government also cut subsidies for council housing and promoted private sector involvement. This led to a shift in the focus of council housing from general needs to the rehousing of the poorest and most vulnerable.
- The 1988 Housing Act introduced "Tenants' Choice," allowing tenants to transfer to other landlords.
- Large-Scale Voluntary Transfer (LSVT) became a common way for councils to divest their housing stock.
- The government also promoted the use of private finance for housing projects.
The Rise of Housing Associations. Housing associations became increasingly important in the provision of social housing. They were seen as more efficient and responsive than local authorities, but they also faced criticism for their lack of accountability.
- Housing associations became the main providers of new social housing.
- They were often seen as a more market-oriented alternative to council housing.
- They also faced criticism for their lack of democratic accountability.
7. New Labour: Regeneration and Residualization
Since Mrs Thatcher’s introduction of Right to Buy in 1980 and the virtual cessation of new build since then, our social housing stock has diminished drastically.
New Deal for Communities. New Labour's approach to housing focused on regeneration and tackling social exclusion. The New Deal for Communities (NDC) program aimed to improve deprived neighborhoods through a combination of physical improvements and social programs.
- The Aylesbury Estate was a key site for the NDC program.
- The program emphasized "joined-up solutions" to complex problems.
- It also promoted the idea of "mixed communities."
Single Regeneration Budget. The Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) was introduced in 1994 to streamline government funding for regeneration projects. This program continued the emphasis on partnership and private sector involvement.
- The SRB was intended to be a more holistic approach to regeneration.
- It also continued the trend of reducing council housing stock.
- The North Peckham Estate was a major beneficiary of SRB funding.
Decent Homes Standard. The Decent Homes Standard, introduced in 2000, aimed to bring all social housing up to a minimum standard of repair and amenity. While this program improved the quality of many homes, it also led to further stock transfers and a decline in council ownership.
- The program required all social homes to meet a minimum standard.
- It led to a significant investment in social housing.
- It also furthered the trend of stock transfer to housing associations.
8. Present Day: A Crisis of Affordability and Purpose
Grenfell has reminded us, in the most powerful way imaginable, how much we need the state.
Grenfell and its Aftermath. The Grenfell Tower fire exposed the dangers of deregulation, cost-cutting, and the marginalization of social housing. It also highlighted the need for stronger tenant voices and greater accountability in the sector.
- The fire was a tragedy for its residents and a symbol of the social housing crisis.
- It exposed the dangers of combustible cladding and poor management.
- It also raised questions about the role of private companies in social housing.
Welfarization and Insecurity. The current trend is towards welfarization, with social housing increasingly seen as a safety net for the poorest and most vulnerable. This has led to a decline in the quality and security of social housing, as well as a growing sense of stigma among its residents.
- Fixed-term tenancies have become more common.
- "Pay to Stay" policies have been introduced, increasing rents for higher-income tenants.
- The focus has shifted from providing homes to managing poverty.
A New Renaissance? Despite the challenges, there are signs of a renewed interest in council housing. Some local authorities are exploring new models of public housing provision, with a focus on quality, community, and sustainability.
- Some councils are building new council homes.
- There is a growing recognition of the need for genuinely affordable housing.
- The future of social housing remains uncertain, but there is a growing sense that change is needed.
Last updated:
Review Summary
Municipal Dreams receives mixed reviews, praised for its comprehensive history of UK council housing but criticized by some as dry and statistic-heavy. Readers appreciate the book's defense of public housing and its detailed account of social policy changes. Many find it informative and well-researched, offering insights into the rise and fall of council estates. However, some readers find the writing style challenging, with excessive architectural details and figures. Overall, it's considered a valuable resource for understanding the complex history of social housing in Britain.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub
digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.