Key Takeaways
1. Frame the negotiation to shape perceptions and outcomes
Control the frame of the negotiation. The frame that takes hold will shape how negotiators make decisions, evaluate options, and decide what is acceptable.
Framing shapes reality. How you present a proposal or situation can be as important as its substance. Effective negotiators actively shape the lens through which others view the negotiation. This could mean reframing a divisive issue into multiple issues, presenting your preferred option as the default, or shifting the reference point for evaluating offers.
Tactics for effective framing:
- Split one contentious issue into multiple smaller issues
- Present your proposal as the default option
- Establish a favorable reference point for comparisons
- Label and explain your concessions clearly
- Diffuse the spotlight from any single prominent issue
By controlling the frame, you expand the set of possible agreements and make it easier for others to say yes. The key is to frame options in a way that aligns with the other party's interests and helps them save face.
2. Negotiate process before substance to set the stage for success
Have a process strategy: how will you get from where you are today to where you want to be? Consider the factors that influence whether, when, and how substantive negotiations will occur.
Process shapes outcomes. Before diving into substantive deal points, negotiate the process first. This includes deciding who will be involved, what will be on the agenda, how decisions will be made, and the overall timeline. By shaping these factors, you create conditions more favorable to reaching your desired outcome.
Key process elements to consider:
- Who will be involved and in what capacity
- What issues will be discussed and in what order
- Whether negotiations will be public or private
- How progress will be measured and reported
- What happens if no agreement is reached
Negotiating process gives you more control and helps avoid misunderstandings later. It also allows you to address potential obstacles proactively. Be sure to seek clarity and commitment on the agreed process, even if you can't fully control it.
3. Preserve forward momentum to overcome deadlocks
Preserve forward momentum. How will pursuing near-term advantage affect future engagement?
Progress begets progress. In protracted negotiations, maintaining forward momentum is crucial. This means deliberately taking steps to eliminate obstacles and create conditions for eventual success, even if a final deal isn't immediately possible. Short-term victories that damage long-term prospects should be avoided.
Tactics to preserve momentum:
- Keep a low bar for progress on individual issues
- Use "sufficient consensus" rather than requiring unanimity
- Create channels to manage residual conflicts post-agreement
- Stay engaged, even after failed negotiations
Remember that today's tactics shape tomorrow's negotiating environment. Building trust and demonstrating good faith, even in small ways, can pay dividends later when tackling bigger issues.
4. Leverage the power of empathy to expand options
Empathy expands the set of options you have for resolving the conflict. The better you understand the other side's perspective, the more likely you are to find a solution.
Understanding unlocks possibilities. Empathy isn't about being nice; it's a powerful tool to expand your options. By truly grasping the other side's interests, constraints, and perspective, you can craft proposals more likely to be accepted and find creative solutions to deadlocks.
Ways to practice empathy in negotiation:
- Consider all possible explanations for their behavior
- Identify their psychological, structural, and tactical barriers
- Create "slack" to accommodate mistakes or misunderstandings
- Don't force them to choose between smart decisions and saving face
Empathy is especially crucial when dealing with those who seem least deserving of it. The more intolerable their behavior, the greater the potential benefit of understanding its root causes.
5. Map out the negotiation space to understand all parties
Map out the negotiation space. Your strategy should take into account all parties who can influence the deal or who are influenced by the deal.
Context is key. Effective negotiators think beyond just the parties at the table. They consider all stakeholders who can influence or be affected by the deal. This "negotiation space" includes direct parties, their constituents, regulators, competitors, and others.
Steps to map the negotiation space:
- Identify all relevant parties
- Analyze each party's interests, constraints, alternatives, and perspective (ICAP)
- Consider how third parties influence the dynamics
- Evaluate how the landscape might change over time
By mapping the full negotiation space, you can anticipate obstacles, identify leverage points, and craft more comprehensive solutions. This broader view also helps you prepare for good fortune – being ready to seize unexpected opportunities.
6. Create value by seeing others as partners, not opponents
See the other side as your partner, not your opponent, regardless of the type or degree of conflict. It is hard to empathize or collaborate with "opponents."
Collaboration trumps competition. Even in adversarial situations, viewing the other side as a partner rather than an opponent opens up possibilities. This mindset shift encourages you to seek value-creating solutions that benefit both parties, rather than fighting over a fixed pie.
Strategies for partner-focused negotiation:
- Start by asking: "What would be the value-maximizing outcome?"
- Look for ways to expand the pie before dividing it
- Encourage the other side to imagine seemingly impossible solutions
- Focus on interests behind positions, not just stated demands
Remember that today's adversary may be tomorrow's ally. By treating others as partners, you build relationships and reputations that can pay off in unexpected ways down the road.
7. Understand deep-rooted perspectives to resolve protracted conflicts
Protracted conflicts cannot be resolved without genuine efforts to understand the deep-seated forces that legitimize each side's perspective and behavior.
History shapes reality. In long-standing conflicts, each side often has a deeply ingrained narrative that shapes their worldview. These narratives are reinforced by education, media, and culture, making them resistant to change. Resolving such conflicts requires more than just addressing immediate issues.
Approaches to bridging divergent perspectives:
- Acknowledge that each side sees its view as legitimate
- Recognize how history and identity shape current positions
- Avoid asking for "sacred" concessions as preconditions
- Help parties find value-creating ways to apply lessons from the past
True resolution comes not from forcing others to adopt your perspective, but from finding ways to accommodate or bridge competing narratives. This requires patience, creativity, and a willingness to challenge one's own assumptions.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is Negotiating the Impossible by Deepak Malhotra about?
- Focus on deadlocked negotiations: The book explores how to break deadlocks and resolve ugly conflicts, especially when traditional leverage like money or power is absent.
- Human interaction at the core: Malhotra redefines negotiation as any human interaction aimed at reaching agreement despite differences, making the lessons widely applicable.
- Real-world case studies: The author uses stories from history, business, diplomacy, and sports to illustrate negotiation principles in action.
- Three overlooked levers: The book is structured around the power of framing, process, and empathy as alternative sources of leverage.
Why should I read Negotiating the Impossible by Deepak Malhotra?
- Practical tools for tough cases: The book provides actionable strategies for resolving even the most intractable disputes where money and muscle fail.
- Broad applicability: Lessons apply to business, diplomacy, labor disputes, and personal conflicts, making it valuable for anyone who negotiates.
- Rich storytelling: Real-world examples—from the NFL lockout to the US Constitution—make complex ideas accessible and memorable.
- Mindset and process focus: The book teaches how to manage not just the substance but also the process and framing of negotiations.
What are the key takeaways and principles from Negotiating the Impossible by Deepak Malhotra?
- Control the frame: How a negotiation is framed shapes perceptions and options; reframing can unlock value and break deadlocks.
- Power of process: Managing the negotiation process—clarity, commitment, momentum, and credibility—can be as important as negotiating substance.
- Empathy as leverage: Understanding the other side’s perspective, even when they seem undeserving, creates more possibilities for agreement.
- Value creation: Look beyond zero-sum thinking to find creative, value-creating solutions using all available levers.
How does Deepak Malhotra define negotiation in Negotiating the Impossible and why is this important?
- Broad definition: Negotiation is any process where parties with differing interests or perspectives attempt to reach agreement.
- Beyond haggling: This definition includes all forms of deal making, dispute resolution, and conflict management, not just formal bargaining.
- Strategic implications: It encourages negotiators to consider psychological, relational, and process factors, not just material terms.
- Holistic approach: Recognizing negotiation as fundamental human interaction expands its relevance and applicability.
What are the three key levers in Negotiating the Impossible and why are they important?
- Power of Framing: Shaping how parties perceive the negotiation, issues, and options can make identical proposals more or less attractive.
- Power of Process: Managing the agenda, participants, timing, and rules can be more decisive than bargaining on substance alone.
- Power of Empathy: Understanding real interests, emotions, and perspectives enables negotiators to craft solutions that address underlying needs.
- Alternative leverage: These levers provide sources of influence beyond financial or physical power, especially in deadlocked situations.
How does Negotiating the Impossible by Deepak Malhotra explain the "power of framing" in negotiation?
- Psychological influence: Framing is how proposals are structured or presented, shaping attitudes toward the deal and the other party.
- Strategic reframing: Changing the frame can help the other side back down from unrealistic demands and create narratives of mutual gain.
- Real-world example: The 2011 NFL collective bargaining agreement used reframing to allow both sides to claim victory without costly concessions.
- Early control: Controlling the frame early and helping the other side "sell" the deal are key tactics for breaking deadlocks.
What is the "power of process" in negotiation according to Negotiating the Impossible?
- Process shapes outcomes: How negotiations unfold—the agenda, participants, timing, and rules—can be as important as what is negotiated.
- Strategic process management: A well-designed process preserves momentum, builds trust, and avoids pitfalls that can derail talks.
- Historical example: James Madison’s success at the Constitutional Convention hinged on changing the process, not just the substance.
- Practical advice: Negotiators should have a process strategy, seek clarity and commitment, and synchronize with counterparts on progress.
How does Deepak Malhotra use empathy as a negotiation tool in Negotiating the Impossible?
- Empathy as strategy: Empathy is about understanding the other party’s motivations, interests, and constraints to expand your own options.
- Crucial with adversaries: It is most important when dealing with difficult or undeserving parties, as it helps de-escalate and find solutions.
- Creates flexibility: Empathy allows for mistakes or misunderstandings without immediate escalation, preserving negotiation momentum.
- Uncovers hidden compatibilities: By humanizing opponents, empathy helps resolve conflicts that seem irreconcilable.
What is the ICAP framework in Negotiating the Impossible and how should it be used?
- Comprehensive analysis tool: ICAP stands for Interests, Constraints, Alternatives, and Perspective, helping negotiators analyze all parties involved.
- Interests: Understand what each party values and why they want the deal.
- Constraints: Identify what parties can or cannot do, including their limitations and flexibility.
- Alternatives and Perspective: Assess outside options and consider how each party views the negotiation, including their mindset and priorities.
How does Negotiating the Impossible by Deepak Malhotra recommend handling ultimatums and threats?
- Ignore most ultimatums: Avoid forcing the other side into a corner where they must stick to rigid positions.
- Rephrase ultimatums: When necessary, reframe ultimatums into less rigid statements to allow for future flexibility.
- Avoid issuing ultimatums: Only make ultimatums if you intend to follow through, as they reduce strategic flexibility and can escalate conflict.
- Maintain engagement: Keeping communication open is often more productive than issuing threats.
What is "strategic ambiguity" in Negotiating the Impossible and when should it be used?
- Deliberate vagueness: Strategic ambiguity involves crafting agreements with language open to multiple interpretations, allowing each side to present the deal favorably.
- Enables difficult deals: It is useful when parties have aligned incentives to behave appropriately despite ambiguity and when trust is insufficient for full commitment.
- Risks and trade-offs: Ambiguity can sow future conflict and mistrust if substantive disagreements remain unresolved.
- Best for deadlocks: Use when reducing current deadlock outweighs the risk of future disputes.
What are the best quotes from Negotiating the Impossible by Deepak Malhotra and what do they mean?
- “Empathy expands the set of options—for you.” Understanding others’ perspectives is a strategic advantage, not just a moral choice.
- “If you are not at the table, you are on the menu.” Staying engaged in negotiations is crucial to avoid being exploited or sidelined.
- “There are no great tactics, only great principles.” Effective negotiation relies on underlying principles, not just situational tactics.
- “Never let fear dictate your response to the problems of human interaction.” Courage and engagement are essential, even in the face of difficult conflicts.
Review Summary
Navigating the Impossible receives high praise for its practical approach to negotiation, offering principles and frameworks applicable to various scenarios. Readers appreciate the diverse case studies, from historical events to business deals, illustrating key concepts of framing, process, and empathy. The book is commended for its insights on resolving conflicts without relying on money or muscle. While some find the format typical of business books, many consider it a valuable resource for both seasoned negotiators and those new to the field, offering actionable advice for breaking deadlocks and finding creative solutions.
Similar Books
About the Author
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
