Key Takeaways
1. Market society was once championed by egalitarians
Opposition to economic monopolies was part of a broader agenda of dismantling monopolies across all domains of social life: not just the guilds, but monopolies of church and press, monopolization of the vote by the rich, and monopolization of family power by men.
Early market advocates saw free markets as a path to equality and liberation from various forms of oppression. They believed that by breaking down economic monopolies and opening up trade, more people would achieve personal independence and become "masterless" individuals. This vision was supported by thinkers like the Levellers, John Locke, Adam Smith, and Thomas Paine.
Key aspects of this vision:
- Dismantling of economic, religious, and political monopolies
- Universal access to property ownership and self-employment
- Reduction of servile dependencies on lords and masters
- Increased bargaining power and dignity for workers
The hope was that a free market society would create a more egalitarian order, where individuals could achieve autonomy and equal social standing through their own efforts and enterprise.
2. The Industrial Revolution shattered the egalitarian vision of market society
The Industrial Revolution destroyed those hopes, but not the idea of market society on which those hopes rested.
Economies of scale brought about by the Industrial Revolution fundamentally altered the structure of production and labor markets. Large-scale enterprises replaced small proprietorships, and opportunities for self-employment shrank dramatically. This shift undermined the core premise of early market egalitarianism.
Key changes:
- Concentration of capital in large firms
- Decline of artisanal and small-scale production
- Rise of wage labor as the dominant form of employment
- Widening gulf between employers and employees
The reality of industrial capitalism diverged sharply from the earlier vision of a society of independent producers. However, many continued to deploy market rhetoric and ideals even as the actual conditions no longer supported them, creating a disconnect between ideology and reality.
3. Private government dominates modern workplaces
Most workers in the United States are governed by communist dictatorships in their work lives.
Workplace authoritarianism is pervasive in modern economies, yet often goes unrecognized. The typical employment relationship involves subjecting workers to a form of private government with extensive control over their activities and behavior.
Characteristics of workplace private government:
- Hierarchical authority structures
- Unilateral rule-making by employers
- Limited due process or appeal rights for workers
- Extensive monitoring and control of worker behavior
- Arbitrary exercise of power by managers
This system of governance stands in stark contrast to democratic ideals in the political sphere, yet affects most people's daily lives far more directly than state authority in many cases.
4. Employers wield extensive power over workers' lives
Usually, those dictatorships have the legal authority to regulate workers' off-hour lives as well—their political activities, speech, choice of sexual partner, use of recreational drugs, alcohol, smoking, and exercise.
Employer authority extends far beyond the workplace itself, often intruding into workers' private lives and personal choices. This expansive power is enabled by the legal doctrine of at-will employment in the United States, which allows employers to fire workers for almost any reason.
Examples of employer control:
- Regulating off-duty speech and social media activity
- Dictating personal appearance and grooming standards
- Mandating health and lifestyle choices
- Influencing political participation and affiliations
- Monitoring personal communications and activities
The breadth of this authority creates a state of "republican unfreedom" for workers, who are vulnerable to arbitrary interference in many aspects of their lives by their employers.
5. Economic theories often overlook workplace authoritarianism
Alchian and Demsetz appear to be claiming that wherever individuals are free to exit a relationship, authority cannot exist within it. This is like saying that Mussolini was not a dictator, because Italians could emigrate.
Ideological blinders in economic theory often lead to a mischaracterization or outright denial of workplace authority. Many economists and libertarian thinkers portray employment relationships as voluntary market exchanges between equals, ignoring the reality of power imbalances and hierarchical control.
Key misconceptions:
- Equating employment with independent contracting
- Focusing solely on entry and exit conditions, not ongoing governance
- Assuming perfect competition eliminates workplace authority
- Neglecting the role of state-established baseline rules
These theoretical oversights contribute to a systemic neglect of workplace governance issues in public discourse and policy debates. Recognizing the reality of private government in the workplace is crucial for addressing its impacts.
6. Workers lack meaningful voice and protection in private governments
Employers' authority over workers, outside of collective bargaining and a few other contexts … is sweeping, arbitrary, and unaccountable—not subject to notice, process, or appeal.
Limited worker rights characterize most employment relationships, with few checks on employer power. Unlike citizens in a democracy, workers typically have little say in the rules that govern their work lives and limited recourse against arbitrary treatment.
Deficits in worker protections:
- Lack of due process in disciplinary actions
- No guaranteed rights of free speech or association
- Limited privacy protections
- Inadequate safeguards against harassment and abuse
- Weak enforcement of existing labor laws
The absence of robust worker voice and rights leaves many employees vulnerable to exploitation, unfair treatment, and violations of their dignity and autonomy.
7. Workplace democracy and labor reforms offer potential solutions
My point is simply that workers need some kind of institutionalized voice at work to ensure that their interests are heard, that they are respected, and that they have some share of autonomy in workplace decisions.
Empowering workers through various institutional reforms could help address the democratic deficit in workplace governance. While full workplace democracy may not be feasible or desirable in all contexts, increasing worker voice and rights can mitigate the worst abuses of private government.
Potential reforms:
- Strengthened labor unions and collective bargaining rights
- Worker representation on corporate boards (codetermination)
- Enhanced legal protections for worker speech and privacy
- Improved mechanisms for addressing workplace grievances
- Greater employee participation in decision-making processes
These approaches aim to introduce more democratic elements into workplace governance without completely dismantling existing organizational structures.
8. Rethinking workplace governance is crucial for a free society of equals
A free society of equals cannot be founded on an institutional structure in which the vast majority of workers for most of their productive lives labor under such government.
Reconciling democratic values with workplace realities requires a fundamental reconsideration of how we organize economic production. The current system of private government in the workplace is incompatible with ideals of freedom and equality in the broader society.
Key considerations:
- Balancing efficiency with worker autonomy and dignity
- Aligning workplace governance with democratic principles
- Addressing power imbalances in employment relationships
- Recognizing the centrality of work in people's lives and identities
Developing new models of workplace governance that better respect worker freedom and equality is essential for realizing the promise of a truly democratic society. This challenge requires ongoing experimentation, debate, and institutional innovation.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is "Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives" by Elizabeth Anderson about?
- Core Argument: The book argues that most American workers are subject to "private government" in the workplace, meaning they are ruled by their employers in ways that are often arbitrary, unaccountable, and authoritarian.
- Historical Perspective: Anderson traces the evolution of free market ideology from its egalitarian roots to its current form, showing how the Industrial Revolution shifted the balance of power from self-employed individuals to large-scale employers.
- Workplace as Government: She redefines the workplace as a form of government, where employers have sweeping authority over employees, often extending into their private lives.
- Call for Rethinking: The book calls for a radical rethinking of how we understand freedom, equality, and authority in the context of employment.
Why should I read "Private Government" by Elizabeth Anderson?
- Unseen Power Structures: The book exposes the often-overlooked authoritarian power that employers wield over workers, challenging common assumptions about workplace freedom.
- Historical Insight: It provides a rich historical context, showing how ideas about markets, freedom, and equality have changed over time.
- Relevance to Modern Work: Anderson’s analysis is highly relevant to contemporary debates about labor rights, workplace democracy, and economic justice.
- Stimulates Critical Thinking: The book encourages readers to question dominant ideologies and consider alternative ways of organizing work and protecting worker dignity.
What are the key takeaways from "Private Government" by Elizabeth Anderson?
- Workplaces as Private Governments: Most workplaces function as private governments, with employers exercising significant, often unchecked, authority over employees.
- Ideological Blindness: Prevailing free market ideology masks the reality of workplace domination, focusing only on state power as a threat to liberty.
- Historical Shift: The promise of free markets as a path to equality was undermined by the Industrial Revolution, which concentrated economic power in the hands of employers.
- Need for Reform: Anderson advocates for greater worker protections, including enhanced exit rights, a workers’ bill of rights, and more robust mechanisms for worker voice and participation.
How does Elizabeth Anderson define "private government" in "Private Government"?
- Authority and Subordination: Private government exists wherever some have the authority to issue orders to others, backed by sanctions, in some domain of life, and those governed have little or no say in how that authority is exercised.
- Workplace Application: In the workplace, this means employers can dictate not only work tasks but also aspects of employees’ private lives, often without accountability or recourse.
- Contrast with Public Government: Unlike democratic governments, private governments are not accountable to those they govern; employees typically lack meaningful input or protection.
- Relative Privacy: The "privacy" of private government is defined relative to the governed (the workers), not just relative to the state.
What is the historical context behind the concept of "private government" in Anderson's book?
- Egalitarian Origins: Early free market advocates like the Levellers, Locke, and Adam Smith saw markets as a means to promote equality and personal independence.
- Industrial Revolution Impact: The rise of large-scale industry destroyed the ideal of universal self-employment, creating a gulf between employers and employees.
- Shift in Ideology: As self-employment became less attainable, free market ideology shifted to ignore the new realities of workplace domination.
- Legacy of Old Ideals: Modern discourse still relies on outdated assumptions, failing to recognize the authoritarian nature of most employment relationships.
How does "Private Government" by Elizabeth Anderson critique current free market ideology?
- Misplaced Focus on State: Anderson argues that current ideology wrongly identifies the state as the sole threat to individual liberty, ignoring employer power.
- Voluntariness Myth: The idea that labor contracts are purely voluntary and equal is challenged; in reality, workers often have little bargaining power or alternatives.
- Blindness to Domination: The book highlights how free market ideology fails to see the arbitrary and sweeping authority employers have over workers.
- Ideological Function: Anderson shows how dominant ideologies can mask problematic features of social life, making it harder to recognize and address workplace injustices.
What are the main forms of worker subordination described in "Private Government" by Elizabeth Anderson?
- Arbitrary Authority: Employers can issue orders and impose sanctions without notice, process, or appeal, often extending beyond the workplace.
- Lack of Voice: Most workers have little or no say in workplace governance, with decisions made unilaterally by management.
- Vulnerability to Abuse: Workers can be fired for reasons unrelated to job performance, including off-duty behavior, political views, or personal relationships.
- Limited Legal Protections: Outside of collective bargaining or specific legal exceptions, workers’ rights are minimal and often unenforced.
What solutions or reforms does Elizabeth Anderson propose in "Private Government"?
- Enhanced Exit Rights: Strengthening workers’ ability to leave jobs without undue penalty, including limiting noncompete clauses.
- Workers’ Bill of Rights: Establishing basic constitutional rights for employees, such as protection of speech, privacy, and freedom from discrimination.
- Greater Worker Voice: Supporting mechanisms for worker participation in governance, such as unions, works councils, or codetermination models.
- Rule of Law in the Workplace: Applying principles of due process and equal protection to workplace governance to limit arbitrary employer power.
How does "Private Government" address the argument that workers are free because they can quit their jobs?
- High Exit Costs: Anderson points out that quitting often comes with significant financial and personal costs, making it an unrealistic option for many.
- False Equivalence: She compares the argument to saying a dictator isn’t oppressive because people can emigrate—technically possible, but practically difficult.
- Structural Constraints: The lack of alternative employment or self-employment options limits real freedom of exit.
- Insufficient Safeguard: Freedom to quit does not compensate for the lack of voice or protection from arbitrary authority within the workplace.
How does "Private Government" by Elizabeth Anderson respond to critics who argue that workplace authority is necessary for efficiency?
- Necessity of Hierarchy: Anderson acknowledges that some hierarchy and managerial discretion are needed for efficient production in large organizations.
- Limits of Efficiency Argument: She argues that efficiency does not justify arbitrary or unaccountable authority, nor does it require the sweeping powers employers currently hold.
- Abuse Beyond Efficiency: Many employer practices (e.g., off-duty control, harassment) have no efficiency rationale and are simply abuses of power.
- Alternative Models: The book points to successful examples (like German codetermination) where worker voice and efficiency coexist.
What are the best quotes from "Private Government" by Elizabeth Anderson and what do they mean?
- “Most workers in the United States are governed by communist dictatorships in their work lives.” – Anderson uses this provocative analogy to highlight the authoritarian, centrally planned nature of most workplaces, challenging the myth that only the state can be oppressive.
- “Private government is government that has arbitrary, unaccountable power over those it governs.” – This defines the core concept, emphasizing the lack of accountability and participation for workers.
- “To deny employers’ authority over workers because of freedom of exit, says Anderson, ‘is like saying that Mussolini wasn’t a dictator, because Italians could emigrate.’” – This quote illustrates the inadequacy of exit rights as a safeguard against workplace domination.
- “It is high time that public discourse acknowledged this reality and the costs to workers’ freedom and dignity that private government imposes on them.” – Anderson calls for a shift in how society talks about and addresses workplace power.
What is the significance of the historical figures and movements (Levellers, Locke, Smith, Paine, Lincoln) discussed in "Private Government"?
- Levellers: Early English egalitarians who advocated for broad political and economic rights, including opposition to monopolies and support for free trade as a path to independence.
- John Locke: Supported property rights and contract freedom as means to personal independence, but within a broader egalitarian critique of arbitrary authority.
- Adam Smith: Saw free markets as a way to dismantle feudal hierarchies and promote a society of equals, not as a justification for employer domination.
- Thomas Paine: Championed self-employment and social insurance, envisioning a society where most people worked for themselves.
- Abraham Lincoln: Embodied the ideal of free labor and self-employment, but his vision was ultimately undermined by industrialization and the rise of wage labor.
- Significance: Anderson uses these figures to show that the original free market vision was deeply egalitarian and that current realities betray those ideals.
Review Summary
Private Government explores how employers wield dictatorial power over workers' lives, challenging notions of freedom in capitalist societies. Anderson argues that workplace hierarchies resemble private governments, often infringing on employee rights and dignity. The book analyzes historical context, contrasting pre-industrial ideals with modern corporate realities. Reviewers praise Anderson's insights but some critique her academic approach. The format, including commentaries and Anderson's responses, is appreciated for fostering debate. Many readers found the book thought-provoking, though some disagreed with its premises or felt it lacked practical solutions.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
