Facebook Pixel
Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
The Death and Life of the Great American School System

The Death and Life of the Great American School System

How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education
by Diane Ravitch 2010 283 pages
4.05
5k+ ratings
Listen
Listen

Key Takeaways

1. Education reform has strayed from its original purpose, focusing on testing and accountability instead of curriculum and learning

The effort to upend American public education and replace it with something market-based began to feel too radical for me.

Reform gone astray. Education reform in recent decades has shifted dramatically from its original focus on improving curriculum and learning. Instead, it has embraced market-based solutions, high-stakes testing, and rigid accountability measures. This approach, while well-intentioned, has often led to a narrowing of the curriculum and an overemphasis on test preparation rather than genuine learning.

Unintended consequences. The intense focus on test scores and accountability has resulted in:

  • Neglect of subjects not directly tested (e.g., history, science, arts)
  • Teaching to the test rather than fostering deep understanding
  • Increased stress on students and teachers
  • A devaluation of teacher professionalism and autonomy

The author argues that this shift has moved education reform too far from its core purpose of providing a rich, well-rounded education to all students. Instead of improving education, these reforms may be harming the very system they aim to fix.

2. The standards movement was hijacked by test-based accountability, narrowing the curriculum

When NCLB was passed, curriculum and instruction were swept off the table as national priorities.

Standards derailed. The standards movement of the 1990s aimed to establish clear, high-quality learning goals for all students. However, this promising approach was overtaken by a narrow focus on test-based accountability, particularly with the passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) in 2001.

Curriculum neglected. This shift had several negative consequences:

  • State standards became vague to avoid controversy
  • Focus narrowed to primarily reading and math
  • Rich content in history, science, and the arts was often neglected
  • Teaching became more about test preparation than deep learning

The author argues that this emphasis on testing and accountability came at the expense of developing strong, content-rich curricula. By focusing solely on measurable outcomes in a few subjects, the broader goals of education – fostering critical thinking, creativity, and civic engagement – were often sacrificed.

3. Market-based reforms and charter schools have not consistently improved education

School choice does not miraculously produce good schools.

Choice is not enough. While school choice and charter schools have been promoted as solutions to educational inequities, the evidence for their effectiveness is mixed at best. The author argues that market-based reforms alone cannot solve the complex challenges facing public education.

Mixed results. Research on charter schools and choice programs shows:

  • Some charters perform well, others underperform traditional public schools
  • Choice can lead to increased segregation
  • High-performing charters often benefit from selection effects or additional resources
  • Systemic improvement remains elusive

The author contends that while some charter schools have shown promise, they are not a panacea. The focus on choice and competition has often come at the expense of improving the existing public school system, which continues to educate the vast majority of students.

4. Teacher evaluation based solely on test scores is flawed and counterproductive

Value-added assessment of teachers is a sham.

Flawed metrics. The push to evaluate teachers based primarily on their students' test scores, often through "value-added" models, is fundamentally flawed. This approach fails to account for the many factors outside a teacher's control that influence student performance.

Negative impacts:

  • Encourages teaching to the test
  • Demoralizes teachers and discourages collaboration
  • Fails to capture many important aspects of good teaching
  • Can produce unreliable and inconsistent results year-to-year

The author argues that effective teacher evaluation requires a more holistic approach, including classroom observations, peer review, and multiple measures of student learning. Relying solely on test scores creates perverse incentives and fails to improve teaching quality.

5. Philanthropic foundations have outsized influence on education policy without accountability

There is something fundamentally antidemocratic about relinquishing control of the public education policy agenda to private foundations run by society's wealthiest people.

Unelected influence. Major philanthropic foundations, such as Gates, Broad, and Walton, have come to exert enormous influence over education policy in recent years. While well-intentioned, this outsized role raises concerns about democratic accountability and the narrowing of reform approaches.

Problematic power dynamics:

  • Foundations can quickly scale up favored reforms without public input
  • Their focus on market-based solutions may not align with public priorities
  • Grant-making can shape research agendas and silence potential critics
  • Lack of accountability when reforms fail

The author argues that while philanthropic support for education can be valuable, the current level of influence is problematic. Education policy should be shaped through democratic processes, not by the preferences of a few wealthy individuals or organizations.

6. No Child Left Behind set unrealistic goals and narrowed the curriculum to tested subjects

NCLB was a punitive law based on erroneous assumptions about how to improve schools.

Flawed assumptions. No Child Left Behind, while well-intentioned, was based on flawed assumptions about how to improve schools. Its unrealistic goal of 100% proficiency by 2014 and its rigid accountability measures led to numerous unintended consequences.

Negative impacts:

  • Narrowed curriculum to focus on tested subjects (reading and math)
  • Encouraged teaching to the test and gaming of the system
  • Labeled many schools as failing without providing adequate support
  • Ignored the role of poverty and other out-of-school factors in student achievement

The author contends that NCLB's approach of measuring and punishing schools failed to address the root causes of educational inequity. Its emphasis on high-stakes testing came at the expense of a well-rounded education and often harmed the very students it was meant to help.

7. A strong curriculum in liberal arts and sciences is essential for a well-rounded education

Our schools will not improve if we continue to focus only on reading and mathematics while ignoring the other studies that are essential elements of a good education.

Broad knowledge matters. A rich, well-rounded curriculum in the liberal arts and sciences is essential for developing educated citizens capable of participating fully in a democratic society. The author argues that the current narrow focus on reading and math skills is insufficient.

Key components of a strong curriculum:

  • History and civics to understand our democratic heritage
  • Literature to develop cultural literacy and empathy
  • Science to foster critical thinking and understanding of the natural world
  • Arts to nurture creativity and self-expression
  • Foreign languages to broaden perspectives

The author contends that by neglecting these subjects, we fail to provide students with the knowledge and skills they need to thrive in a complex world. A return to a content-rich, broad curriculum is essential for improving education.

8. Public education remains vital to American democracy and should not be privatized

The market serves us well when we want to buy a pair of shoes or a new car or a can of paint; we can shop around for the best value or the style we like. The market is not the best way to deliver public services.

Public good, not commodity. The author strongly argues that public education is a cornerstone of American democracy and should not be treated as a market commodity. While private schools have a role, a strong public education system is essential for fostering civic engagement and equal opportunity.

Risks of privatization:

  • Increased segregation and inequality
  • Loss of democratic control and accountability
  • Neglect of students with greatest needs
  • Erosion of common civic culture

The author contends that while choice and competition may have a role, they should not be the primary drivers of education reform. Maintaining and improving a strong public education system should be a national priority.

9. Effective reform requires improving curriculum, instruction, and learning conditions

The most durable way to improve schools is to improve curriculum and instruction and to improve the conditions in which teachers work and children learn.

Focus on fundamentals. The author argues that lasting educational improvement requires a focus on the core elements of schooling: what is taught, how it is taught, and the conditions in which teaching and learning occur. This approach contrasts with reforms focused primarily on governance, accountability, or market-based solutions.

Key areas for improvement:

  • Developing rich, coherent curricula in all subject areas
  • Investing in teacher preparation and professional development
  • Reducing class sizes and improving school facilities
  • Addressing out-of-school factors that affect learning (e.g., poverty, health)

The author contends that these fundamental improvements, while perhaps less flashy than some reform proposals, are essential for creating high-quality educational experiences for all students. By focusing on these core elements, we can build a stronger, more equitable education system.

Last updated:

FAQ

What's The Death and Life of the Great American School System about?

  • Focus on Education Reform: Diane Ravitch critiques the reliance on testing and market-based reforms in American education, arguing they undermine public education.
  • Historical Context: The book provides a historical overview of educational policies, including the rise of standardized testing and school choice.
  • Personal Reflection: Ravitch shares her journey from supporting these reforms to becoming a skeptic, emphasizing evidence and experience in shaping her views.

Why should I read The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Critical Perspective: The book challenges widely accepted educational reforms, making it essential for educators, policymakers, and parents.
  • Evidence-Based Arguments: Ravitch supports her claims with extensive research and data, offering a well-rounded understanding of education reform complexities.
  • Call to Action: It encourages advocacy for a comprehensive approach to education that prioritizes curriculum and instruction over testing.

What are the key takeaways of The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Skepticism of Testing: Overemphasis on standardized testing narrows the curriculum and focuses on rote learning.
  • Importance of Curriculum: A rich, coherent curriculum grounded in liberal arts and sciences is essential for democratic citizenship and critical thinking.
  • Critique of School Choice: School choice and charter schools often exacerbate inequalities rather than alleviate them.

What are the best quotes from The Death and Life of the Great American School System and what do they mean?

  • “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”: Reflects Ravitch's openness to change based on new evidence.
  • “In education, there are no shortcuts, no utopias, and no silver bullets.”: Emphasizes that meaningful education reform requires sustained effort.
  • “We must preserve American public education, because it is so intimately connected to our concepts of citizenship and democracy.”: Highlights the role of public education in fostering informed citizens.

How does Diane Ravitch define accountability in The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Testing as a Measure: Accountability is often defined by standardized testing, which distorts educational priorities.
  • Consequences of Accountability: High-stakes testing leads to punitive actions rather than constructive support for schools and educators.
  • Need for a Broader Definition: True accountability should include curriculum quality, teacher support, and student engagement.

What is the main argument against No Child Left Behind (NCLB) in The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Flawed Accountability System: NCLB's reliance on standardized testing as the primary measure of success is criticized.
  • Unattainable Goals: The mandate for 100 percent proficiency by 2014 is unrealistic and sets schools up for failure.
  • Neglect of Curriculum: NCLB focuses on reading and math, bypassing the importance of a well-rounded curriculum.

How does The Death and Life of the Great American School System address the role of curriculum in education?

  • Curriculum as Central: A coherent and rich curriculum is essential for effective education.
  • Neglect of the Arts and Sciences: Current reforms often neglect subjects like history, science, and the arts.
  • Call for a Balanced Approach: Advocates for a curriculum that includes a variety of subjects and fosters critical thinking.

What does The Death and Life of the Great American School System say about school choice?

  • Mixed Results: School choice has not delivered the promised improvements in educational outcomes.
  • Impact on Public Schools: School choice can drain resources from public schools, exacerbating inequalities.
  • Call for Strengthening Public Education: Advocates for strengthening public schools rather than promoting choice.

How does Ravitch’s personal journey influence her views in The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Transformation of Beliefs: Ravitch shares her journey from supporting to criticizing testing and accountability reforms.
  • Intellectual Honesty: Emphasizes the importance of changing one’s mind in light of new evidence.
  • Connection to Public Education: Her commitment to public education underscores its importance for democracy.

What role do charter schools play in The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Mixed Results: Many charter schools perform no better than traditional public schools.
  • Impact on Public Schools: Growth of charter schools can lead to a two-tiered education system.
  • Need for Quality: Calls for better oversight and accountability for charter schools.

What solutions does Ravitch propose in The Death and Life of the Great American School System?

  • Focus on Curriculum: Emphasizes developing a strong, coherent curriculum that includes liberal arts and sciences.
  • Support for Teachers: Advocates for better support and professional development for teachers.
  • Strengthening Public Education: Argues for preserving and strengthening public education as a cornerstone of democracy.

How does The Death and Life of the Great American School System critique the No Child Left Behind Act?

  • High-Stakes Testing: Criticizes NCLB for its heavy reliance on high-stakes testing.
  • Unrealistic Goals: Highlights the unattainable goals set by NCLB, such as 100% proficiency.
  • Negative Consequences: Discusses the pressure to raise test scores, leading to cheating and data manipulation.

Review Summary

4.05 out of 5
Average of 5k+ ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

The Death and Life of the Great American School System critiques recent education reforms, arguing that standardized testing and school choice are undermining public education. Ravitch, a former reform advocate, describes how these policies have narrowed curricula, demoralized teachers, and failed to improve outcomes. She argues for a strong curriculum, experienced teachers, adequate resources, and addressing poverty. While some reviewers found the book repetitive, many praised its thorough analysis of reform failures and call for a return to traditional public education values.

Your rating:

About the Author

Diane Ravitch is a prominent education historian and policy expert. She served as U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education from 1991-93 and is currently a Research Professor at New York University. Ravitch has authored numerous books on education history and policy, and maintains an influential blog on education issues. She is known for her shift from supporting to criticizing market-based education reforms. Ravitch founded the Network for Public Education and regularly contributes to The New York Review of Books. She was previously married to Richard Ravitch and is now married to Mary Butz. Her work has significantly influenced education policy debates in the United States.

Download PDF

To save this The Death and Life of the Great American School System summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.23 MB     Pages: 12

Download EPUB

To read this The Death and Life of the Great American School System summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 2.97 MB     Pages: 10
0:00
-0:00
1x
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
Select Speed
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Create a free account to unlock:
Requests: Request new book summaries
Bookmarks: Save your favorite books
History: Revisit books later
Ratings: Rate books & see your ratings
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Listen, bookmark, and more
Compare Features Free Pro
📖 Read Summaries
All summaries are free to read in 40 languages
🎧 Listen to Summaries
Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 10
📜 Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 10
Risk-Free Timeline
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Feb 28,
cancel anytime before.
Consume 2.8x More Books
2.8x more books Listening Reading
Our users love us
50,000+ readers
"...I can 10x the number of books I can read..."
"...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented..."
"...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision..."
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/year
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Try Free & Unlock
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Settings
Appearance
Black Friday Sale 🎉
$20 off Lifetime Access
$79.99 $59.99
Upgrade Now →