Key Takeaways
1. Knowing Isn't Doing: The Gap Between Knowledge and Action
Why do so much education and training, management consulting, and business research and so many books and articles produce so little change in what managers and organizations actually do?
The Knowing-Doing Gap. Organizations often possess the knowledge of what needs to be done to improve performance, yet they fail to translate this knowledge into consistent action. This gap between knowing and doing is a pervasive problem, affecting organizations across various industries and sizes. The problem isn't a lack of information, but a failure to implement what is already known.
The Illusion of Knowledge. Many organizations believe that simply acquiring knowledge through training, consulting, or research is sufficient for change. However, this is a fallacy. Knowledge is only valuable when it is put into practice. The gap between knowing and doing is often wider than the gap between ignorance and knowing.
Focus on Implementation. The key to organizational success lies not just in acquiring knowledge, but in developing the ability to consistently implement that knowledge. This requires a shift in focus from simply knowing what to do to actually doing it. The ability to turn knowledge into action is a source of competitive advantage.
2. Precedent and Memory: The Trap of "How We've Always Done It"
Organizations learn. Then they encase their learning in programs and standard operating procedures that members execute routinely. These programs and procedures generate inertia . . .
The Power of Habit. Organizations, like individuals, develop habits and routines that become deeply ingrained over time. These habits, often based on past practices and precedents, can become barriers to change and innovation. The phrase "that's how we've always done it" is a common symptom of this problem.
Mindless Reliance on the Past. When organizations rely too heavily on precedent, they often fail to question whether existing practices are still effective or relevant. This mindless adherence to the past can lead to stagnation and an inability to adapt to changing circumstances. The past becomes a substitute for thinking.
Breaking Free from the Past. Overcoming the trap of precedent requires a conscious effort to challenge existing assumptions and routines. Organizations must be willing to experiment with new approaches and to learn from both successes and failures. This requires a culture that values innovation and continuous improvement.
3. Talk vs. Action: The Illusion of Progress
The most aggressive minds in an organization rarely focus on measurement systems. . . . Leaders, they feel, should concentrate on important, exciting things like vision and strategy, and let the people with the green eye shades worry about measurement.
The Allure of Talk. Many organizations fall into the trap of substituting talk for action. They spend excessive time in meetings, developing plans, and creating presentations, but fail to translate these activities into tangible results. Talk becomes a substitute for doing.
The Illusion of Control. Leaders often believe that simply making a decision or creating a plan is sufficient to ensure implementation. However, this is a fallacy. Decisions and plans are only valuable when they are followed by concrete actions. The problem is that talk is easy, and action is hard.
Action-Oriented Culture. To avoid the trap of talk, organizations must cultivate a culture that values action and results. This requires a shift in focus from simply talking about what needs to be done to actually doing it. Leaders must model this behavior and hold themselves and others accountable for implementation.
4. Fear: The Great Inhibitor of Knowledge Implementation
Fear helps create knowing-doing gaps because acting on one's knowledge requires that a person believe he or she will not be punished for doing so.
Fear as a Barrier. Fear is a powerful emotion that can prevent people from acting on their knowledge. When people fear for their jobs, their futures, or their self-esteem, they are unlikely to take risks or to challenge the status quo. Fear causes people to repeat past mistakes.
The Cycle of Fear. Fear can create a vicious cycle in organizations. When leaders use fear as a management technique, it can lead to a culture of distrust and paranoia. This, in turn, can further inhibit the ability to turn knowledge into action. Fear makes people focus on the short term.
Driving Out Fear. To overcome the negative effects of fear, organizations must create a culture of trust and psychological safety. This requires leaders to model vulnerability, to encourage open communication, and to reward risk-taking. Driving out fear is essential for creating a learning organization.
5. Measurement: The Double-Edged Sword
The most aggressive minds in an organization rarely focus on measurement systems. . . . Leaders, they feel, should concentrate on important, exciting things like vision and strategy, and let the people with the green eye shades worry about measurement.
The Power of Measurement. What gets measured gets done. Measurement systems have a powerful influence on behavior, focusing attention on what is measured and often ignoring what is not. The problem is that many organizations measure the wrong things.
Flawed Measurement Systems. Many organizations use measurement systems that are too complex, too subjective, or too focused on short-term financial results. These flawed systems can distort behavior and undermine the ability to turn knowledge into action. They can also miss important elements of performance that are difficult to quantify.
Effective Measurement. To create effective measurement systems, organizations must focus on a few key indicators that are aligned with their strategy and values. These measures should be simple, understandable, and relevant to the work that people do. They should also be used to guide behavior, not just to evaluate past performance.
6. Internal Competition: Turning Colleagues into Rivals
Competition will mean the disappearance of the lazy and incompetent, be they workers, industrialists, or distributors. Competition promotes progress.
The Myth of Internal Competition. Many organizations believe that internal competition is a good thing, that it motivates people to work harder and perform better. However, this is often a fallacy. Internal competition can undermine teamwork, collaboration, and knowledge sharing.
The Costs of Competition. When people are pitted against each other, they are less likely to help one another or to share their knowledge. They may even actively sabotage the efforts of their colleagues. Internal competition can create a culture of distrust and animosity.
Building a Cooperative Culture. To overcome the negative effects of internal competition, organizations must foster a culture of cooperation and collaboration. This requires leaders to emphasize shared goals, to reward teamwork, and to create a sense of common purpose. The focus should be on fighting external competitors, not each other.
7. The Power of "Why": Philosophy as a Foundation for Action
What we tried to do was to treat people who joined the company as we ourselves wanted to be treated. . . . If you take care of your people, they will take care of the company.
The Importance of "Why." Organizations that are successful in turning knowledge into action often have a clear sense of "why" they do what they do. They have a well-defined philosophy, a set of core values, and a clear understanding of their business model. This "why" provides a foundation for all of their actions.
Philosophy as a Guide. A strong philosophy helps organizations make decisions, prioritize actions, and stay focused on their goals. It also provides a framework for evaluating new ideas and practices. The "why" is more important than the "how."
Beyond Techniques. Many organizations focus too much on specific techniques and practices, without understanding the underlying philosophy that guides them. This approach is unlikely to be successful. Organizations must first understand "why" before they can effectively implement "how."
8. Learning by Doing: The Path to True Knowledge
We don't know if it's going to make a lot of money for the company, or not. But the technology out there is exciting and it might turn into something. Go for it.
The Limits of Theory. While theoretical knowledge is important, it is not sufficient for effective action. True knowledge comes from experience, from actually doing the work and learning from both successes and failures. Learning by doing is essential for turning knowledge into action.
The Power of Practice. Organizations that are successful in turning knowledge into action emphasize practice and experimentation. They encourage people to try new things, to learn from their mistakes, and to continuously improve their performance. They understand that there is no substitute for experience.
Teaching as Learning. One of the best ways to learn something is to teach it to others. When people are required to explain their knowledge to others, they gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Teaching is a powerful tool for knowledge development and transfer.
9. Leadership: Modeling the Way and Driving Out Fear
The most important role of managers is to create an environment in which people are passionately dedicated to winning in the marketplace. Fear plays a major role in creating and maintaining such passion.
The Role of Leaders. Leaders play a crucial role in creating a culture that supports the translation of knowledge into action. They must model the behaviors they want to see in others, and they must create an environment in which people feel safe to take risks and to challenge the status quo.
Driving Out Fear. One of the most important things leaders can do is to drive out fear from the organization. This requires creating a culture of trust, openness, and psychological safety. Leaders must be willing to admit their own mistakes and to encourage others to do the same.
Modeling the Way. Leaders must also model the behaviors they want to see in others. They must be action-oriented, they must be willing to experiment, and they must be committed to continuous improvement. Leaders must be seen as doers, not just talkers.
10. Simple Systems: The Key to Scalable Action
Organizations learn. Then they encase their learning in programs and standard operating procedures that members execute routinely. These programs and procedures generate inertia . . .
The Power of Simplicity. Organizations that are successful in turning knowledge into action often have simple systems and processes. They avoid unnecessary complexity and focus on the essential elements of their business. Simple systems are easier to understand, to communicate, and to implement.
Avoiding Over-Engineering. Many organizations fall into the trap of over-engineering their systems and processes. They create complex rules, procedures, and reporting requirements that make it difficult for people to act quickly and effectively. Simplicity is a virtue.
Scalability. Simple systems are also more scalable. They can be easily adapted to different contexts and can be implemented across large organizations. This is essential for creating a culture of action that is consistent and sustainable over time.
Last updated:
FAQ
What's The Knowing-Doing Gap about?
- Focus on Knowledge vs. Action: The book examines the disconnect between what organizations know and what they actually do, highlighting inefficiencies and missed opportunities.
- Organizational Behavior Analysis: Authors Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert I. Sutton explore why knowledge often fails to translate into action, emphasizing the role of organizational culture and management practices.
- Practical Solutions: It offers strategies to overcome the knowing-doing gap, focusing on fostering a culture that encourages action based on knowledge.
Why should I read The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Enhance Organizational Performance: The book is crucial for leaders and managers aiming to improve their organization's effectiveness by translating knowledge into action.
- Real-World Case Studies: It includes examples from various companies, illustrating both successes and failures in bridging the knowing-doing gap.
- Actionable Strategies: Readers gain practical advice on creating a culture that promotes learning and implementation, leading to performance improvements.
What are the key takeaways of The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Knowledge Alone is Insufficient: Organizations must create environments that encourage the implementation of knowledge.
- Cultural Impact: Organizational culture significantly influences whether knowledge is acted upon, with fear or competition often hindering action.
- Leadership's Role: Effective leadership is crucial in fostering a culture that values action over mere knowledge, encouraging knowledge sharing and collaboration.
What are the best quotes from The Knowing-Doing Gap and what do they mean?
- "Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.": Highlights the necessity of translating insights into practical actions.
- "Drive out fear.": Suggests that fear in the workplace stifles innovation and prevents employees from acting on their knowledge.
- "Organizations learn. Then they encase their learning in programs and standard operating procedures that members execute routinely.": Warns against rigid adherence to past practices instead of embracing new knowledge.
What is the "knowing-doing gap" as defined in The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Definition of the Gap: It refers to the disparity between what organizations know they should do and what they actually do, highlighting the failure to implement known best practices.
- Causes of the Gap: Factors include fear, lack of trust, and a culture that discourages risk-taking and experimentation.
- Importance of Bridging the Gap: Closing this gap is crucial for improving organizational performance and achieving competitive advantage.
How does fear contribute to the knowing-doing gap in The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Fear of Failure: Fear of making mistakes can prevent employees from taking action based on their knowledge, leading to inaction.
- Distrust in Management: Fear of repercussions for sharing bad news or suggesting improvements creates a culture of silence.
- Impact on Performance: Fear can lead to a focus on short-term results rather than long-term improvement, harming overall effectiveness.
What management practices can help close the knowing-doing gap according to The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Encouraging Open Communication: Foster an environment where employees feel safe to share ideas and feedback without fear of retribution.
- Decentralized Decision-Making: Empower employees at all levels to make decisions, enhancing engagement and willingness to act on knowledge.
- Recognition of Efforts: Reward employees for taking initiative and implementing new ideas, even if they fail, to motivate others.
How can organizations foster a culture of action as suggested in The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Leadership Commitment: Leaders must actively promote and model behaviors that encourage action based on knowledge.
- Shared Goals and Values: Establish common objectives and values to unify employees and motivate them to work together towards action.
- Continuous Learning Environment: Create systems that support ongoing learning and development, allowing employees to apply new skills and knowledge.
How does measurement play a role in the knowing-doing gap in The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Measurement as a Barrier: Poorly designed measurement systems can obstruct good judgment and hinder action.
- Focus on Relevant Metrics: Emphasize key performance indicators that align with the organization's goals and culture.
- Encouraging Accountability: Measurement systems should promote accountability without creating fear, encouraging employees to engage and implement knowledge.
How do successful companies overcome the knowing-doing gap according to The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Case Studies of Success: Examples include companies like British Petroleum and Barclays Global Investors that have bridged the gap through cultural change and effective management practices.
- Emphasis on Collaboration: Successful organizations prioritize teamwork and knowledge sharing, creating environments where employees feel valued.
- Adaptability and Learning: These companies demonstrate a willingness to adapt and learn from both successes and failures.
What are some specific strategies for implementing knowledge in organizations from The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Peer Assists and Knowledge Sharing: Encourage employees to share their expertise with colleagues to facilitate knowledge transfer.
- Decentralized Decision-Making: Empower employees to make decisions at all levels, fostering a sense of ownership and accountability.
- Regular Training and Development: Provide ongoing training opportunities to equip employees with the skills needed to implement new ideas effectively.
How does competition within organizations affect the knowing-doing gap in The Knowing-Doing Gap?
- Internal Rivalry: Competition among employees can create barriers to knowledge sharing and collaboration.
- Undermining Teamwork: Internal competition can lead to a lack of trust and cooperation, essential for effective teamwork.
- Promoting Collaboration: Focus on fostering a collaborative culture that values teamwork over competition to enhance knowledge sharing.
Review Summary
The Knowing-Doing Gap explores why organizations often fail to act on their knowledge. Readers praise its insights on bridging theory and practice, emphasizing action over talk, and fostering a culture of implementation. The book highlights barriers like fear, poor metrics, and internal competition. While some find it dated, many consider it still relevant and valuable for managers and individuals seeking to turn knowledge into results. Critics note its length and occasional lack of concrete solutions, but overall, it's regarded as an important contribution to management literature.
Similar Books






Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub
digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.