Key Takeaways
1. The War on Terror: A Paradigm Shift in National Security
The war on terror—with its vast death tolls in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and elsewhere—could not be sustained without the racialized dehumanization of its Muslim victims.
Redefining threats: The post-9/11 era marked a dramatic shift in how Western governments approached national security. The "war on terror" became an all-encompassing framework that blurred traditional boundaries between foreign and domestic policy, military and police operations, and physical force and ideological battles.
Expanding scope: This new paradigm expanded the definition of threats beyond specific terrorist organizations to include ideologies, beliefs, and even entire communities. It led to:
- The creation of new legal frameworks and security apparatuses
- Increased surveillance of Muslim communities
- Military interventions in multiple countries
- A narrative that often framed the conflict as a clash of civilizations
The consequences of this shift were far-reaching, affecting not only foreign policy but also domestic politics, civil liberties, and social cohesion in Western societies.
2. Radicalization Models: Flawed Assumptions and Consequences
The concept of radicalization emphasizes the individual and, to some extent, the ideology and the group, and significantly de-emphasizes the wider circumstances—the "root causes" that it became so difficult to talk about after 9/11, and that are still often not brought into analyses.
Oversimplification of complex issues: Radicalization models adopted by security agencies often oversimplify the path to extremism, focusing primarily on individual psychology and religious ideology while neglecting broader political and social contexts.
These models typically assume:
- A linear progression from religious conservatism to violent extremism
- That certain religious beliefs or practices are inherently linked to terrorism
- That monitoring these "indicators" can predict future terrorist threats
However, research has shown that:
- There is no clear causal link between religious ideology and violence
- Many individuals holding "radical" views never engage in violence
- Political grievances, social exclusion, and foreign policy often play a more significant role in motivating extremist actions
The reliance on these flawed models has led to counterproductive policies, increased surveillance of Muslim communities, and the potential criminalization of legitimate political dissent.
3. Surveillance and Civil Liberties: The Price of Perceived Security
The structures of informal surveillance that already existed as multiagency partnerships to tackle gangs, antisocial behavior, and so on, were for the first time appropriated for counterterrorism purposes.
Expansion of state power: In the name of counterterrorism, Western governments significantly expanded their surveillance capabilities, often at the expense of civil liberties and privacy rights.
Key developments included:
- Increased data collection and sharing between agencies
- Use of community institutions (schools, social services) for intelligence gathering
- Expanded powers for law enforcement and intelligence agencies
- Creation of watch lists and no-fly lists with little oversight or recourse
This expansion of surveillance had disproportionate impacts on Muslim communities, leading to:
- Self-censorship and a chilling effect on free speech
- Erosion of trust between communities and government institutions
- Potential violation of constitutional rights, particularly in the US
The trade-off between security and liberty remains a contentious issue, with critics arguing that many of these measures are ineffective at preventing terrorism while causing significant harm to democratic values and social cohesion.
4. The Muslim Experience: Caught Between Extremism and Discrimination
Everything this president has done so far has helped foster America's submission to Islam.
Dual pressures: Muslim communities in the West found themselves in an increasingly difficult position after 9/11, facing pressure from both extremist ideologies and rising discrimination.
Challenges included:
- Increased scrutiny and suspicion from law enforcement
- Rise in hate crimes and social discrimination
- Pressure to repeatedly condemn terrorist acts and prove loyalty
- Internal debates about identity and integration
At the same time, a small minority of Muslims, particularly young people, became vulnerable to extremist narratives that offered:
- A sense of purpose and belonging
- Simplified explanations for complex geopolitical issues
- An outlet for frustration with discrimination and foreign policy
This situation created a cycle where discrimination fueled alienation, which in turn could make extremist ideologies more appealing to a small minority, further reinforcing stereotypes and discrimination against the broader Muslim community.
5. Counterterrorism Tactics: From Infiltration to Provocation
By definition, if you are preventative, there will be people dragged into those investigations who did not do something wrong.
Shifting tactics: As the war on terror progressed, law enforcement agencies, particularly in the US, increasingly relied on aggressive tactics to prevent potential terrorist attacks.
These tactics included:
- Widespread use of informants in Muslim communities
- Sting operations and entrapment techniques
- Prosecution for "material support" of terrorism based on vague criteria
Critics argue that these methods:
- Often target vulnerable individuals who pose no real threat
- Create the appearance of terrorist plots where none would have existed
- Damage trust between law enforcement and Muslim communities
- Raise serious ethical and legal questions about due process
Defenders claim these tactics are necessary to prevent attacks before they occur, but the approach has led to numerous controversial cases where the line between prevention and provocation becomes blurred.
6. The Rise of Islamophobia: A New Form of Racism
Islamophobia is sometimes seen as a virus of hatred recurring in Western culture since the Crusades. Others view it as a spontaneous reaction to terrorism that will pass away as the effects of 9/11 recede into history. Many believe it does not exist.
A new xenophobia: The post-9/11 era saw the rise of Islamophobia as a distinct form of prejudice, blending elements of racism, religious intolerance, and cultural chauvinism.
Key features of Islamophobia include:
- Stereotyping all Muslims as potential terrorists
- Viewing Islam as incompatible with Western values
- Promoting conspiracy theories about Muslim "infiltration"
- Using cultural markers (e.g., hijab) as racial signifiers
This phenomenon has manifested in:
- Increased hate crimes and discrimination against Muslims
- Political movements opposing mosque construction and Muslim immigration
- Media portrayals reinforcing negative stereotypes
- Policies targeting Muslim communities for surveillance and restrictions
The rise of Islamophobia has had serious consequences for social cohesion, integration efforts, and the civil rights of Muslims in Western societies. It also risks alienating Muslim communities, potentially making counterterrorism efforts more difficult.
7. Rethinking Terrorism: Beyond Ideology to Political Context
To comprehend the causes of so-called jihadist terrorism we need to pay as much attention to Western state violence, and the identity politics that sustains it, as we do to Islamist ideology.
Broadening the analysis: The book argues for a more comprehensive approach to understanding terrorism, moving beyond a narrow focus on ideology to consider broader political, social, and historical contexts.
Key points include:
- Recognizing the role of Western foreign policy in fueling grievances
- Examining how state violence and non-state terrorism interact and reinforce each other
- Considering the impact of social and economic factors on radicalization
- Analyzing terrorism as a tactic used in specific political conflicts, rather than as the product of a monolithic ideology
This approach suggests that effective counterterrorism strategies should:
- Address underlying political grievances
- Promote inclusive political processes
- Avoid actions that alienate or marginalize communities
- Balance security measures with respect for civil liberties and human rights
By broadening the analysis beyond ideology, policymakers and the public can develop a more nuanced understanding of terrorism and potentially more effective ways to prevent it.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is The Muslims Are Coming!: Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror by Arun Kundnani about?
- Critical examination of counterterrorism: The book analyzes how the domestic war on terror in the US and UK has targeted Muslim communities through policies rooted in Islamophobia and flawed radicalization theories.
- Focus on surveillance and criminalization: Kundnani explores the development and consequences of counterradicalization strategies, surveillance, and the criminalization of Muslim political expression.
- Historical and political context: The book situates these issues within broader histories of racism, imperialism, and political repression, arguing that counterterrorism policies have created a new form of racialized state control.
Why should I read The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani?
- Insight into counterterrorism’s impact: The book provides a detailed, evidence-based critique of counterterrorism policies, exposing their failures and unintended consequences for Muslim communities.
- Understanding Islamophobia: Kundnani connects state policies with the rise of Islamophobic violence and far-right movements, showing how official discourses legitimize anti-Muslim racism.
- Human rights perspective: The book highlights the erosion of civil liberties and the impact of surveillance, emphasizing the need for political empowerment and protection of dissent.
What are the key takeaways from The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani?
- Flawed radicalization models: Government theories often conflate political dissent with terrorism risk, leading to overbroad surveillance and targeting of law-abiding Muslims.
- Surveillance and policing: Multiagency programs like Prevent and FBI informant networks intrude into the private and political lives of Muslims, fostering fear and self-censorship.
- Islamophobia and far-right movements: The rise of groups like the English Defence League is linked to official anti-extremism rhetoric, fueling racism and violence.
- Political consequences: The securitization of Muslim identity restricts political expression and undermines democratic engagement, prompting Kundnani to call for ending the war on terror.
How does Arun Kundnani define and critique the concept of radicalization in The Muslims Are Coming!?
- Definition and critique: Radicalization is commonly defined as a process leading individuals to adopt extremist ideologies and commit terrorism, but Kundnani argues this model is oversimplified and lacks empirical support.
- Policy misuse: Radicalization theories have been used to justify intrusive surveillance and interventions, often targeting Muslims broadly rather than focusing on actual threats.
- Empirical shortcomings: Studies show that indicators like political grievances or religious conservatism are poor predictors of terrorist acts, leading to misdirected counterterrorism efforts.
- Criminalization of dissent: The radicalization framework expands counterterrorism to include nonviolent political expression, eroding civil liberties.
What is Islamophobia according to The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani, and how is it connected to structural racism?
- Islamophobia as structural racism: Kundnani defines Islamophobia as the racialization of Muslimness, turning cultural markers into racial signifiers that justify state violence.
- Enabling state control: Islamophobia enables systematic violations of Muslim rights and sustains the ideological power of the war on terror.
- Symbiotic relationship: The book highlights how Islamophobia and official counterterrorism practices reinforce each other to maintain political legitimacy and social control.
- Impact on civil liberties: This structural racism leads to the demonization and criminalization of Muslim communities, undermining their rights and freedoms.
How does The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani critique government radicalization models and their consequences?
- Lack of predictive power: Radicalization models fail to reliably predict who will become terrorists and often conflate holding radical ideas with a propensity for violence.
- Ignoring political context: These models neglect the role of Western foreign policy and state violence in shaping political violence, focusing instead on individual psychological or theological factors.
- Consequences for civil liberties: The models justify intrusive surveillance, community policing, and criminalization of constitutionally protected activities within Muslim communities.
- Expansion of counterterrorism: The radicalization framework broadens the scope of counterterrorism to include nonviolent dissent, undermining democratic rights.
What is the UK’s Prevent strategy, and how does Arun Kundnani assess its impact in The Muslims Are Coming!?
- Prevent’s objectives: Prevent aims to stop people from becoming terrorists by countering extremist ideology and reshaping Muslim identities through multiagency partnerships and interventions.
- Conflation of dissent and extremism: Kundnani argues that Prevent conflates extremism with dissent and foreign policy opposition, leading to the targeting of law-abiding Muslims.
- Surveillance and intervention: The program involves confidential panels and co-opts public service providers into intelligence gathering, blurring lines between support and surveillance.
- Community consequences: Prevent fosters alienation, mistrust, and self-censorship within Muslim communities, while failing to address root causes of political disaffection.
How does the FBI’s use of agents provocateurs and informants feature in The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani?
- Infiltration and entrapment: The FBI uses undercover agents and informants to infiltrate Muslim communities and provoke individuals into criminal acts, often manufacturing terrorism cases.
- Targeting the vulnerable: Operations frequently target marginalized individuals with mental health or addiction issues, raising ethical and legal concerns.
- Community impact: The widespread use of informants creates mistrust and fear, discouraging open political discussion and activism within Muslim communities.
- Legal and civil rights issues: Entrapment defenses rarely succeed, as courts often equate radical views with predisposition to terrorism, undermining constitutional rights.
What is the relationship between Islamophobia, far-right movements, and the war on terror in The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani?
- Interconnected phenomena: Islamophobia and far-right groups like the English Defence League draw on official anti-extremism rhetoric to justify racism and violence.
- Culturalist ideology: Far-right movements adopt a framework that sees Islam as a monolithic extremist threat, using identity politics to mobilize support.
- Conspiracy theories: The shari’a conspiracy theory, alleging a secret Muslim plot to impose Islamic law, fuels anti-Muslim legislation and sentiment.
- Political consequences: The rise of Islamophobia legitimizes discriminatory policies and violence, while obscuring structural causes of social tensions.
How does Arun Kundnani describe the impact of counterterrorism policies on Muslim communities in the US, such as the Somali diaspora in Minneapolis, in The Muslims Are Coming!?
- Case study of Minneapolis Somalis: The FBI’s Operation Rhino targeted Somali Americans with intense surveillance and questioning, despite limited evidence of domestic threat.
- Community divisions: Local leaders competed for government favor, while mosques and activists faced suspicion and pressure, creating an atmosphere of fear.
- Social and economic context: Kundnani highlights poverty, discrimination, and trauma as underlying factors in youth disaffection, which counterterrorism policies often ignore.
- Consequences: These policies led to alienation, mistrust of authorities, and self-censorship, undermining community cohesion and political activism.
What solutions or alternatives does Arun Kundnani propose in The Muslims Are Coming! to the current war on terror approach?
- Ending the war on terror: Kundnani advocates dismantling the war on terror’s racialized surveillance and counterradicalization apparatus, which he sees as counterproductive and rights-violating.
- Restoring political spaces: He emphasizes the need for open, democratic spaces where Muslim communities can express dissent and engage in solidarity without fear.
- Addressing root causes: The book calls for tackling social and economic inequalities, neocolonialism, and exclusion that fuel disaffection and extremism.
- Protecting civil liberties: Kundnani stresses the importance of safeguarding free speech, privacy, and due process, warning against the normalization of totalitarian surveillance.
What are the best quotes from The Muslims Are Coming! by Arun Kundnani and what do they mean?
- On radicalization models: “Radicalization theories are not only empirically flawed but serve to legitimize the policing of dissent and the expansion of state power.” This highlights how such models are used to justify intrusive policies.
- On Islamophobia: “Islamophobia is not simply a matter of individual prejudice but a structural form of racism embedded in state practices.” This underscores the systemic nature of anti-Muslim discrimination.
- On political engagement: “The solution to extremism is not more surveillance, but more democracy.” Kundnani argues for political empowerment and open debate as antidotes to violence.
- On the war on terror: “The war on terror has become a war on political dissent.” This quote encapsulates the book’s central critique of how counterterrorism undermines democratic freedoms.
Review Summary
The Muslims Are Coming! is praised for its insightful analysis of Islamophobia and the War on Terror in the US and UK. Reviewers commend Kundnani's examination of government surveillance, radicalization narratives, and the impact on Muslim communities. The book challenges prevailing notions about terrorism's origins, arguing it stems from Western foreign policy and domestic repression rather than Islamic ideology. Readers appreciate the well-researched content, compelling case studies, and the author's ability to expose flaws in counterterrorism strategies. Many consider it essential reading for understanding contemporary Islamophobia and its political context.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
