Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Who Speaks for Islam?

Who Speaks for Islam?

What a Billion Muslims Really Think
by Dalia Mogahed 2008 204 pages
4.05
1.1K ratings
Listen
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Unlock listening & more!
Continue

Key Takeaways

1. Muslims admire Western values but reject cultural imperialism

"While Muslim women admire aspects of the West, they do not endorse wholesale adoption of Western values."

Nuanced admiration. Muslims across the world express admiration for Western technology, democracy, and individual freedoms. However, this admiration does not translate into a desire to wholly adopt Western culture. Many Muslims view Western societies as morally decadent and overly permissive, particularly regarding sexual norms and family values.

Selective adaptation. Rather than wholesale adoption of Western models, most Muslims seek to incorporate certain Western advancements within their own cultural and religious frameworks. This selective approach allows for modernization without abandoning core Islamic principles and values. The challenge lies in striking a balance between embracing beneficial aspects of Western progress while preserving cultural authenticity and religious identity.

2. Democracy and Islam are compatible in the eyes of most Muslims

"Overall, Muslims want neither a theocracy nor a secular democracy and would opt for a third model in which religious principles and democratic values coexist."

Islamic democracy. Contrary to popular belief, the majority of Muslims see no inherent conflict between democratic principles and Islamic values. Many express a strong desire for democratic governance, including free elections, civil liberties, and political participation. However, they envision a form of democracy that incorporates Islamic principles rather than a purely secular model.

Sharia and democracy. While support for Sharia law is high in many Muslim countries, this does not necessarily translate to a desire for theocracy. Most Muslims view Sharia as a set of guiding principles rather than a rigid legal code. They seek a balance where democratic institutions operate within an Islamic ethical framework. This nuanced view challenges the notion that Islam and democracy are incompatible, highlighting the potential for unique, culturally-specific forms of democratic governance in Muslim-majority countries.

3. Religious extremism is driven by politics, not piety

"The real difference between those who condone terrorist acts and all others is about politics, not piety."

Political grievances. Contrary to popular belief, religious devotion is not a reliable predictor of extremist views. The data shows that those who support terrorist acts are no more religious than the general Muslim population. Instead, the primary drivers of extremism are political grievances, particularly those related to perceived Western domination and interference in Muslim countries.

Occupation and intervention. Research reveals that foreign occupation is a major motivating factor in nearly every case of suicide terrorism. This finding challenges the notion that terrorism is primarily rooted in religious ideology. Instead, it suggests that addressing political issues, such as foreign military presence and intervention in Muslim countries, may be more effective in combating extremism than focusing on religious reform.

Key drivers of extremism:

  • Perceived Western domination
  • Foreign military occupation
  • Interference in internal affairs of Muslim countries
  • Support for authoritarian regimes

4. Muslim women desire rights within an Islamic framework

"Far from being an obstacle to progress, Islam is seen as a crucial part of this progress."

Islamic feminism. Muslim women overwhelmingly support gender equality and expanded rights. However, they often seek these rights within an Islamic framework rather than through wholesale adoption of Western feminist models. Many Muslim women view their faith as a source of empowerment and a tool for achieving gender justice.

Cultural context. Western attempts to "liberate" Muslim women often backfire by ignoring local cultural contexts and Islamic traditions. Successful advocacy for women's rights in Muslim societies often involves working within Islamic legal and ethical frameworks, rather than imposing external models. This approach allows for progress while maintaining cultural authenticity and religious legitimacy.

Examples of Islamic feminist approaches:

  • Reinterpretation of Islamic texts to support women's rights
  • Challenging patriarchal cultural practices as un-Islamic
  • Advocating for women's education and political participation as Islamic values

5. The "clash of civilizations" narrative is oversimplified and harmful

"Contrary to popular belief that anti-Americanism equals hatred of Western values and culture, Muslim responses to numerous open-ended questions lead in a different direction."

Nuanced views. The data reveals that Muslims do not view the West as a monolithic entity. They distinguish between different Western countries and leaders, often expressing admiration for certain Western values while criticizing specific policies. This nuanced perspective challenges the simplistic "clash of civilizations" narrative that portrays Islam and the West as inherently incompatible.

Shared values. Many Muslims express admiration for Western technological advancements, democratic systems, and individual freedoms. These shared values provide common ground for dialogue and cooperation. By focusing on these areas of agreement rather than emphasizing differences, it becomes possible to build bridges and foster mutual understanding between Muslim and Western societies.

6. U.S. foreign policy, not culture, drives anti-American sentiment

"The primary cause of broad-based anger and anti-Americanism is not a clash of civilizations but the perceived effect of U.S. foreign policy in the Muslim world."

Policy critiques. Anti-American sentiment in Muslim countries is primarily driven by opposition to specific U.S. foreign policies rather than a rejection of American values or culture. Key issues include:

  • Perceived double standards in promoting democracy
  • Support for authoritarian regimes in Muslim countries
  • Military interventions and occupations (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan)
  • Perceived bias in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Admiration and resentment. Many Muslims express admiration for American technological advancements, educational systems, and democratic institutions. However, this admiration coexists with deep resentment over U.S. foreign policy actions perceived as harmful to Muslim countries. This complex relationship challenges simplistic narratives about Muslim attitudes towards America and highlights the potential for improved relations through policy changes.

7. Mutual understanding is key to improving Muslim-West relations

"Showing consistency of concern for Muslims' well-being, respecting Islam, and making concrete changes in foreign policy are crucial steps in improving Muslim-West relations."

Bridging the gap. Improving relations between Muslim societies and the West requires efforts on both sides. Key steps include:

  • Increasing cultural and religious literacy
  • Addressing legitimate political grievances
  • Promoting dialogue and people-to-people exchanges
  • Challenging stereotypes and misperceptions

Policy implications. Western governments, particularly the United States, can improve relations by demonstrating consistent concern for Muslim well-being, respecting Islamic values, and reevaluating foreign policies that are perceived as harmful or biased. Simultaneously, Muslim societies can work to counter extremism and promote a more nuanced understanding of Western societies among their populations.

8. Islam is diverse and cannot be reduced to a monolithic entity

"Muslims globally, like people of many other faiths, are geographically, racially, linguistically, and culturally diverse."

Global diversity. Islam encompasses a wide range of cultures, ethnicities, and interpretations. Key points of diversity include:

  • Geographical spread: From Morocco to Indonesia
  • Ethnic diversity: Arabs, Persians, South Asians, Africans, etc.
  • Sectarian divisions: Sunni, Shia, Sufi, etc.
  • Cultural variations: Local customs and traditions
  • Interpretative differences: Conservative, liberal, and reformist approaches

Implications for engagement. Recognizing this diversity is crucial for effective engagement with Muslim societies. One-size-fits-all approaches are likely to fail, as they ignore the complex realities of different Muslim communities. Policymakers and analysts must develop nuanced, context-specific strategies when dealing with various Muslim populations.

9. Poverty and ignorance do not cause terrorism

"The politically radicalized, on average, are more educated than moderates: 67% of the politically radicalized have secondary or higher educations (versus 52% of moderates)."

Debunking stereotypes. Contrary to popular belief, terrorism is not primarily driven by poverty or lack of education. The data shows that many terrorists come from middle-class backgrounds and have above-average education levels. This finding challenges simplistic narratives about the root causes of extremism and highlights the need for more nuanced approaches to counterterrorism.

Political motivations. Instead of economic factors, the primary drivers of radicalization appear to be political grievances and a sense of injustice. Key factors include:

  • Perceived Western domination and interference
  • Lack of political freedom in many Muslim countries
  • Conflicts involving Muslim populations (e.g., Palestine, Kashmir)
  • Sense of cultural and religious threat from globalization

10. Western advocacy for Muslim women often backfires

"Blaming Islam for women's mistreatment is a losing strategy that alienates those who would otherwise support an end to violence and women's oppression and empowers those who oppose women's rights in the name of defending Islam against a West who hates and wants to destroy the faith."

Cultural sensitivity. Well-intentioned Western efforts to promote women's rights in Muslim societies often backfire due to a lack of cultural sensitivity and understanding. Many Muslim women reject what they perceive as Western cultural imperialism, even as they advocate for expanded rights within their own cultural and religious frameworks.

Effective advocacy. Successful promotion of women's rights in Muslim societies often involves:

  • Working within Islamic frameworks rather than against them
  • Supporting local women's movements and initiatives
  • Addressing broader issues of political and economic development
  • Avoiding rhetoric that pits women's rights against religious values

By adopting these approaches, advocates can more effectively support Muslim women's aspirations for equality and empowerment while respecting their cultural and religious identities.

Last updated:

FAQ

What’s "Who Speaks for Islam?: What a Billion Muslims Really Think" by Dalia Mogahed and John L. Esposito about?

  • Largest-ever Muslim opinion poll: The book presents findings from a massive, multi-year Gallup study surveying tens of thousands of Muslims across more than 35 countries, representing over 90% of the world’s Muslim population.
  • Voices of ordinary Muslims: It aims to reveal what everyday Muslims actually think about religion, politics, the West, extremism, and women’s rights, countering stereotypes and media narratives.
  • Data-driven insights: The authors use statistical evidence rather than expert opinion or anecdote, letting the data “speak” for the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims.
  • Key themes: Topics include Muslim identity, democracy, radicalism, women’s rights, the West-Muslim world relationship, and the roots of anti-Americanism and extremism.

Why should I read "Who Speaks for Islam?" by Dalia Mogahed and John L. Esposito?

  • Countering misconceptions: The book challenges widespread myths and stereotypes about Muslims, Islam, and the so-called “clash of civilizations.”
  • Informed perspective: It provides a nuanced, evidence-based understanding of Muslim attitudes, essential for policymakers, educators, and anyone interested in global affairs.
  • Relevance to current events: The findings are crucial for understanding issues like terrorism, democracy in the Muslim world, and Western-Muslim relations.
  • Empowers dialogue: By highlighting the diversity and complexity of Muslim views, it encourages more respectful and productive cross-cultural conversations.

What are the key takeaways from "Who Speaks for Islam?" by Dalia Mogahed and John L. Esposito?

  • Diversity of Muslim views: Muslims are not a monolithic group; they are ethnically, culturally, and ideologically diverse, with only about 20% being Arab.
  • Desire for democracy and rights: Majorities of Muslims admire Western political freedoms and want democracy, but also value religious principles and do not seek wholesale Westernization.
  • Extremism is a minority: Only a small minority (7%) condone attacks like 9/11, and they are not more religious than moderates; their grievances are primarily political, not theological.
  • Women’s rights and religion: Most Muslim women want equal rights and see Islam as compatible with their aspirations, but do not necessarily want Western models imposed.
  • Respect and policy matter: The most common Muslim request for improving relations with the West is respect for Islam and less political interference, not cultural change.

How did the Gallup World Poll gather data for "Who Speaks for Islam?" and why is it credible?

  • Comprehensive sampling: The poll used face-to-face and telephone interviews in over 35 countries with significant Muslim populations, covering urban and rural areas.
  • Large, representative sample: The survey represents more than 90% of the world’s Muslims, with results statistically valid within a ±3% margin of error.
  • Standardized methodology: Questions were carefully designed, translated, and tested to avoid bias and ensure comparability across countries.
  • Objective, non-advocacy research: Gallup conducted the study independently, with no political or advocacy agenda, focusing on scientific rigor and transparency.

What does "Who Speaks for Islam?" reveal about the diversity of the Muslim world?

  • Ethnic and cultural variety: Muslims come from 57 countries, with the largest populations in Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India—not the Arab world.
  • Religious diversity: The majority are Sunni (85%), but there are significant Shia populations and various schools of thought, practices, and levels of observance.
  • Socioeconomic differences: Muslim societies range from wealthy Gulf states to impoverished nations, with varying levels of education, gender roles, and political systems.
  • Global presence: Muslims live not only in traditional Muslim-majority countries but also as minorities in Europe, North America, and elsewhere, contributing to further diversity.

How does "Who Speaks for Islam?" define and explain key Islamic concepts like jihad, Sharia, and the role of religion?

  • Jihad: The book clarifies that jihad primarily means “struggle” or “striving” for a good life and self-improvement; only a minority interpret it as violent struggle, and the Quran prohibits targeting civilians.
  • Sharia: For most Muslims, Sharia is a moral and spiritual guide, not a rigid legal code; support for Sharia as a source of legislation varies in meaning and does not equate to support for theocracy.
  • Religion’s centrality: Faith and family are core values for most Muslims, providing identity, meaning, and guidance, similar to the role of religion in many American lives.
  • Pluralism and flexibility: The book highlights the diversity of interpretations and the ongoing debates within Islam about law, modernity, and social issues.

What does "Who Speaks for Islam?" say about Muslim attitudes toward democracy and theocracy?

  • Strong support for democracy: Majorities in most Muslim countries want democratic freedoms, such as free speech and fair judicial systems, and admire these aspects of the West.
  • Unique models desired: Muslims generally seek a model that combines democratic governance with religious values, not a strict separation of religion and state or a theocracy.
  • Sharia as a source, not sole law: While many want Sharia as a source of legislation, few want it as the only source, and most do not want religious leaders directly in charge of government.
  • Gender parity in support: Both men and women show similar levels of support for democracy and for Sharia as a source of law.

According to "Who Speaks for Islam?", what are the real drivers of radicalism and support for terrorism among Muslims?

  • Political, not religious, grievances: The politically radicalized are motivated by perceived Western political domination, occupation, and lack of respect, not by religious fanaticism.
  • No link to poverty or ignorance: Radicals are often better educated and more optimistic about their personal futures than moderates; unemployment and poverty are not distinguishing factors.
  • Minority phenomenon: Only 7% of respondents condoned the 9/11 attacks, and they are not more religious than the majority who condemn such violence.
  • Shared admiration for the West: Even radicals admire Western technology and democracy; their anger is directed at specific policies, not Western culture as a whole.

How does "Who Speaks for Islam?" address the issue of women’s rights and gender equality in Muslim societies?

  • Majority support for rights: Most Muslim women (and men) believe women should have equal legal rights, the right to vote, work, and hold leadership positions.
  • Nuanced views on equality: Some women see “the same legal rights” as not always fair, preferring complementary roles that reflect family responsibilities and financial protections.
  • Religion as empowerment: Many Muslim women see Islam as a source of dignity and rights, not as an obstacle; they often advocate for change using religious arguments.
  • Suspicion of Western intervention: Muslim women generally do not want to be “liberated” by the West and are wary of advocacy that ignores their own priorities or is linked to political agendas.

What does "Who Speaks for Islam?" reveal about Muslim perceptions of the West and the roots of anti-Americanism?

  • Admiration and resentment: Muslims admire Western technology, democracy, and freedoms, but resent perceived disrespect for Islam, political interference, and double standards in foreign policy.
  • Not a clash of civilizations: The book finds that the conflict is about policy, not principles; Muslims do not hate Western values but want respect and fair treatment.
  • Differentiation among Western countries: Muslims distinguish between the U.S., Britain, France, and Germany, with negative views often tied to specific leaders or policies.
  • Desire for better relations: Most Muslims want improved relations with the West and believe mutual respect and understanding are key.

How does "Who Speaks for Islam?" debunk common myths about Muslims and Islam?

  • Muslims are not monolithic: The book dispels the idea that Muslims are a single, unified group with the same beliefs and goals.
  • Extremism is not the norm: The vast majority of Muslims reject terrorism and violence against civilians, often more so than the general American public.
  • Women are not universally oppressed: Muslim women’s voices reveal agency, aspirations, and support for rights, challenging the stereotype of passive victims.
  • The West is not universally hated: Muslims admire many aspects of Western society and do not seek to change Western culture, but want respect and non-interference.

What are the best quotes from "Who Speaks for Islam?" by Dalia Mogahed and John L. Esposito, and what do they mean?

  • “The conflict between the Muslim and Western communities is far from inevitable. It is more about policy than principles.”
    This highlights the book’s central finding that political grievances, not cultural or religious differences, drive tensions.
  • “The most important thing the West can do to improve relations with their societies is to moderate their views toward Muslims and respect Islam.”
    This quote summarizes the most common request from Muslims for better relations: respect, not cultural change.
  • “Jihad is a ‘struggle for God,’ which includes a struggle of the soul as well as the sword. The Islamic war ethic prohibits attacking civilians.”
    This clarifies a widely misunderstood concept, emphasizing the ethical and spiritual dimensions of jihad.
  • “Muslim women cherish their religion and their rights.”
    This challenges the stereotype that Muslim women are passive victims, showing their agency and pride in both faith and rights.
  • “Diagnosing terrorism as a symptom and Islam as the problem, though popular in some circles, is flawed and has serious risks with dangerous repercussions.”
    This warns against conflating Islam with extremism, arguing that such views alienate moderates and fuel radicalism.

Review Summary

4.05 out of 5
Average of 1.1K ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

Who Speaks for Islam? presents findings from a comprehensive Gallup poll of Muslims worldwide, challenging common misconceptions about Islam. Reviewers found it eye-opening and informative, praising its data-driven approach to understanding Muslim perspectives on democracy, women's rights, and the West. Some critics noted outdated information and questioned interpretation of statistics. Many readers appreciated the book's efforts to dispel stereotypes and provide a more nuanced view of Islam, though some found the writing style dry. Overall, it was seen as a valuable resource for understanding Muslim opinions globally.

Your rating:
4.51
35 ratings

About the Author

Dalia Mogahed is a Senior Analyst and Executive Director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies. She co-authored "Who Speaks for Islam?" with John L. Esposito, analyzing Gallup's survey of over 1 billion Muslims worldwide. Mogahed leads the Muslim-West Facts Initiative and engages diverse groups globally on Muslim opinions. She has presented findings to high-level organizations and opinion leaders, including the UN Alliance of Civilizations and World Economic Forum. Mogahed holds an MBA from the University of Pittsburgh and a chemical engineering degree. She previously worked at Procter & Gamble as a marketing products researcher before joining Gallup.

Download PDF

To save this Who Speaks for Islam? summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.21 MB     Pages: 13

Download EPUB

To read this Who Speaks for Islam? summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 3.06 MB     Pages: 11
Listen
Now playing
Who Speaks for Islam?
0:00
-0:00
Now playing
Who Speaks for Islam?
0:00
-0:00
Voice
Speed
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Queue
Home
Library
Get App
Create a free account to unlock:
Requests: Request new book summaries
Bookmarks: Save your favorite books
History: Revisit books later
Recommendations: Personalized for you
Ratings: Rate books & see your ratings
100,000+ readers
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Listen, bookmark, and more
Compare Features Free Pro
📖 Read Summaries
All summaries are free to read in 40 languages
🎧 Listen to Summaries
Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 4
📜 Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 4
📥 Unlimited Downloads
Free users are limited to 1
Risk-Free Timeline
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Jun 13,
cancel anytime before.
Consume 2.8x More Books
2.8x more books Listening Reading
Our users love us
100,000+ readers
"...I can 10x the number of books I can read..."
"...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented..."
"...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision..."
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/year
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Start a 7-Day Free Trial
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Scanner
Find a barcode to scan

Settings
General
Widget
Loading...