Key Takeaways
1. The Third Crusade: A Clash of Titans and Missed Opportunities
‘The kings of the earth, and all the inhabitants of the world, would not have believed that the adversary and the enemy should have entered into the gates of Jerusalem.’
A World in Shock. The fall of Jerusalem to Saladin in 1187 sent shockwaves across Western Christendom, prompting the Third Crusade. This was not just a military campaign; it was a response to a profound spiritual crisis, a desperate attempt to reclaim the holiest city from the infidel. The news of Hattin and Jerusalem's fall shattered the illusion of Frankish invincibility, revealing the precariousness of their hold on the East.
Three Kings, Divergent Paths. The Crusade was led by three powerful monarchs: Richard I of England, Philip II of France, and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa. Each had their own motivations and priorities, which often clashed. Frederick, an aging warrior, was driven by a personal desire to fight the infidel, while Philip's participation was more politically motivated. Richard, the Lionheart, was a complex figure, a brilliant military leader but also impulsive and prone to violence. Their divergent paths and personal conflicts ultimately undermined the Crusade's potential.
Barbarossa's Fiasco. The death of Frederick Barbarossa in Anatolia was a devastating blow to the Crusade. His army, the largest single force ever to leave on a Crusade, was demoralized and fragmented. The loss of their charismatic leader highlighted the fragility of the Crusader movement, which often relied on the strength of individual personalities rather than a unified purpose. The failure of the German contingent underscored the challenges of coordinating a large, diverse army across vast distances.
2. Acre: The Crucible of Crusader Ambition and Folly
‘Behold, I will turn back the weapons of war that are in your hands, wherewith ye fight against the king of Babylon, and against the Chaldean, which besiege you without the walls.’
A Siege of Attrition. The siege of Acre became a protracted and brutal affair, a microcosm of the larger conflicts in the Holy Land. The city, a vital port and strategic stronghold, was fiercely contested by both sides. The siege dragged on for years, marked by periods of intense fighting, disease, and famine. It became a symbol of the Crusaders' determination and their inability to achieve a decisive victory.
Rivalries and Factions. The siege of Acre was not just a battle against the Moslems; it was also a battle between the Crusaders themselves. The rivalry between Guy of Lusignan and Conrad of Montferrat for the crown of Jerusalem further divided the Frankish forces. The arrival of new contingents from the West only added to the chaos, as each group had its own agenda and loyalties. The internal conflicts within the Crusader camp mirrored the larger divisions within Christendom.
A Turning Point. Despite the internal strife, the siege of Acre marked a turning point in the Crusades. It was the first major Christian victory since the disaster at Hattin, and it demonstrated that the Franks were still capable of fighting back. However, the victory was costly, and it did not lead to the recovery of Jerusalem. The siege of Acre became a symbol of the Crusaders' resilience and their ultimate failure to achieve their primary goal.
3. Coeur-de-Lion: A Lionheart's Legacy of Valor and Violence
‘I will bring evil from the north, and a great destruction. The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the Gentiles is on his way.’
A Warrior King. Richard I, known as Coeur-de-Lion, was the embodiment of the chivalrous warrior king. His courage, military prowess, and charisma inspired his troops and struck fear into his enemies. He was a natural leader, capable of commanding men and winning battles. His reputation as a warrior king preceded him, and his arrival in the East was met with both hope and trepidation.
A Flawed Hero. Despite his military brilliance, Richard was a flawed hero. He was impulsive, prone to violence, and often lacked political astuteness. His personal quarrels and his inability to compromise undermined the unity of the Crusader forces. His actions, such as the massacre of the Saracen prisoners at Acre, were brutal and counterproductive, further alienating the Moslems and damaging the Crusader cause.
A Legacy of Legend. Richard's legacy is a complex one. He was a brilliant military leader, but also a flawed human being. His exploits in the Holy Land became the stuff of legend, inspiring generations of knights and warriors. However, his actions also contributed to the failure of the Third Crusade and the growing animosity between Christians and Moslems. His story is a reminder that even the greatest heroes are not without their faults.
4. Outremer's Second Kingdom: A Fragile Realm Forged in Conflict
‘And the coast shall be for the remnant of the house of Judah.’
A Narrow Strip of Land. The Third Crusade, despite its grand ambitions, resulted in the establishment of a much smaller and more fragile Frankish kingdom. The Franks controlled only a narrow strip of land along the coast, from Jaffa to Tyre, with a few isolated outposts further north. This second kingdom of Outremer was a shadow of its former self, constantly threatened by the Moslems and plagued by internal divisions.
A Precarious Existence. The second kingdom of Outremer was a precarious entity, dependent on the shifting alliances and rivalries of the Moslem world. The Franks were forced to navigate a complex political landscape, balancing their desire for territorial expansion with the need for peaceful coexistence with their neighbors. Their survival depended on their ability to adapt to changing circumstances and to maintain a delicate balance of power.
A Legacy of Resilience. Despite its fragility, the second kingdom of Outremer endured for another century. Its survival was a testament to the resilience and adaptability of the Frankish colonists. They developed a unique culture, blending Western and Eastern traditions, and they managed to maintain a semblance of order in a chaotic world. Their story is a reminder that even in the face of adversity, human communities can find ways to survive and even thrive.
5. Misguided Crusades: The Perils of Religious Zealotry
‘She that was great among the nations, and princess among the provinces, how is she become tributary! . . . , all her friends have dealt treacherously with her, they are become her enemies.’
The Fourth Crusade's Betrayal. The Fourth Crusade, intended to liberate the Holy Land, was diverted to Constantinople, resulting in the sack of the Byzantine capital. This act of betrayal not only destroyed a great Christian civilization but also further alienated the Eastern Orthodox Church from the West. The Fourth Crusade became a symbol of the corruption and misguided zealotry that had come to characterize the Crusading movement.
The Children's Crusade. The Children's Crusade, a tragic episode in the history of the Crusades, demonstrated the dangers of religious fanaticism and the exploitation of the innocent. The story of the children who set out for the Holy Land, only to be sold into slavery or to perish along the way, is a stark reminder of the human cost of misguided faith. It highlights the need for critical thinking and the dangers of blindly following charismatic leaders.
A Legacy of Division. The misguided Crusades, particularly the Fourth, left a legacy of division and mistrust between the Eastern and Western Churches. The sack of Constantinople and the subsequent establishment of the Latin Empire further widened the schism between the two branches of Christendom. These events demonstrated the destructive potential of religious zealotry and the importance of tolerance and understanding.
6. Mongols and Mameluks: A New Power Struggle in the East
‘Can two walk together, except they be agreed?’
The Rise of the Mongols. The emergence of the Mongol Empire under Jenghiz Khan and his successors dramatically altered the political landscape of Asia. The Mongols, a nomadic people from the steppes of Central Asia, conquered vast territories, including Persia, China, and parts of Russia. Their military prowess and their ruthless efficiency made them a formidable force in the East.
The Mameluks of Egypt. The Mameluks, a military caste of slave soldiers, rose to power in Egypt in the mid-thirteenth century. They were skilled warriors and shrewd politicians, and they quickly established themselves as the dominant force in the region. Their victory over the Mongols at Ain Jalud in 1260 marked a turning point in the history of the Middle East.
A Clash of Empires. The rivalry between the Mongols and the Mameluks became a defining feature of the late thirteenth century. The two powers clashed repeatedly in Syria and Palestine, each seeking to expand its influence and control. The Franks of Outremer were caught in the middle of this power struggle, forced to navigate a complex political landscape and to choose sides in a conflict that was not of their making.
7. The End of Outremer: A Legacy of Loss and Resilience
‘And now, I have sent a cunning man, endued with understanding.’
The Fall of Acre. The fall of Acre in 1291 marked the end of the Frankish presence in the Holy Land. The city, the last major Crusader stronghold, was captured by the Mameluks after a fierce siege. The loss of Acre was a devastating blow to the Crusader cause, and it signaled the end of an era. The Franks were forced to abandon their dreams of a Christian kingdom in the East.
A Legacy of Loss. The end of Outremer was a tragedy for the Franks who had settled there. They lost their homes, their lands, and their way of life. Many were killed or enslaved, and those who escaped were forced to seek refuge in Cyprus or in the West. The loss of Outremer was a reminder of the fragility of human endeavors and the impermanence of earthly power.
A Legacy of Resilience. Despite the loss of their kingdom, the Franks of Outremer left behind a legacy of resilience and cultural exchange. They had created a unique society, blending Western and Eastern traditions, and they had demonstrated their ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Their story is a reminder that even in the face of defeat, human communities can find ways to endure and to leave their mark on history.
8. Commerce and Culture: The Enduring Legacy of Outremer
‘By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence.’
A Crossroads of Trade. Outremer was a major center of trade, connecting the East and the West. The Frankish ports, particularly Acre, were bustling hubs of commerce, where merchants from all over the world came to buy and sell goods. The trade routes that passed through Outremer brought wealth and prosperity to the region, but they also created tensions and rivalries.
A Blend of Cultures. The Franks of Outremer were not just warriors and merchants; they were also patrons of the arts and sciences. They built magnificent castles and churches, and they created a unique culture that blended Western and Eastern traditions. Their art, architecture, and literature reflected the diverse influences that shaped their lives.
An Enduring Legacy. Despite the loss of their kingdom, the Franks of Outremer left behind an enduring legacy. Their castles and churches still stand as testaments to their skill and ingenuity. Their legal and administrative systems influenced the development of law in the West. Their story is a reminder of the complex and multifaceted nature of the Crusades and their lasting impact on the world.
Last updated:
FAQ
What is A History of the Crusades, Vol. III: The Kingdom of Acre and the Later Crusades by Steven Runciman about?
- Comprehensive coverage of later Crusades: The book details the history of the Crusader states from the Third Crusade through the fall of Acre in 1291, focusing on the Kingdom of Acre and the final phases of the Crusades.
- Political, military, and cultural analysis: It examines the interplay of faith, politics, warfare, and commerce among Crusaders, Muslims, Mongols, and Byzantines.
- Decline and collapse: The narrative traces the gradual decline of Outremer, internal strife, and the external pressures that led to the end of Christian rule in the Levant.
- Broader context: Runciman also explores the cultural, economic, and artistic life of the Crusader states, situating them within the wider medieval world.
Why should I read A History of the Crusades, Vol. III by Steven Runciman?
- Authoritative and balanced scholarship: Runciman is a renowned historian whose meticulous research and nuanced perspective provide a thorough understanding of the Crusades’ later period.
- Engaging narrative style: The book combines scholarly rigor with vivid storytelling, making complex historical events accessible and compelling.
- Insight into medieval geopolitics: Readers gain a deep appreciation for the intricate diplomacy, military campaigns, and cultural exchanges that shaped the medieval Near East.
- Context for modern issues: The work helps explain the historical roots of East-West relations and the enduring legacy of the Crusades.
What are the key takeaways from A History of the Crusades, Vol. III by Steven Runciman?
- Crusades as a tragic failure: Runciman concludes that the Crusades ultimately failed to achieve their aims, leading to the decline of Eastern Christendom and deepening divisions between East and West.
- Complex interplay of motives: The Crusades were driven by faith, ambition, greed, and political intrigue, resulting in both moments of heroism and episodes of folly.
- Enduring cultural impact: The Crusades influenced architecture, commerce, and intellectual life, and contributed to the Renaissance by dispersing Byzantine scholars to the West.
- Lessons on intolerance and division: The book highlights the dangers of religious intolerance, disunity, and the consequences of prioritizing short-term gains over long-term stability.
Who were the key figures and leaders in the later Crusades according to Steven Runciman?
- Crusader leaders: Figures such as King Richard Coeur-de-Lion, Emperor Frederick II, King Louis IX of France, and King Hugh of Cyprus played pivotal roles in military and diplomatic efforts.
- Muslim leaders: Saladin, Sultan Baibars, and Sultan al-Ashraf Khalil were instrumental in resisting and eventually overcoming the Crusader states.
- Mongol Khans: Jenghiz Khan, Hulagu, and the Ilkhans of Persia influenced the balance of power through invasions and attempted alliances.
- Other influential actors: Italian merchant republics (Venice, Genoa, Pisa), the Military Orders, and local barons shaped the political and economic landscape of Outremer.
How does Steven Runciman describe the causes and consequences of the Fourth and Fifth Crusades in A History of the Crusades, Vol. III?
- Fourth Crusade’s diversion: The Fourth Crusade was diverted from its original goal and resulted in the sack of Constantinople, causing lasting damage to Byzantine civilization and Christian unity.
- Fifth Crusade’s near success and failure: The Fifth Crusade captured Damietta but failed to advance on Cairo due to disunity and poor leadership, ending in a disastrous retreat and loss of resources.
- Political intrigue and manipulation: Both Crusades were marked by manipulation from Venetian interests and internal rivalries among Crusader leaders.
- Long-term consequences: These failures weakened the Crusader states, deepened East-West divisions, and set the stage for further decline.
What role did the Mongols and Mameluks play in the later Crusades as explained by Steven Runciman?
- Mongol invasions and diplomacy: The Mongols expanded rapidly, at times seeking alliances with Crusader states, but their demands and unpredictability made them unreliable partners.
- Turning point at Ain Jalud: The Mameluks halted the Mongol advance at the Battle of Ain Jalud in 1260, preserving the Islamic world and ending Mongol ambitions in the region.
- Rise of the Mameluks: The Mameluks, under leaders like Baibars, became the dominant Muslim power, systematically dismantling Crusader holdings.
- End of Outremer: The combined pressure from Mongol invasions and Mameluk campaigns led to the final collapse of the Crusader states.
How does A History of the Crusades, Vol. III by Steven Runciman portray the political and military challenges faced by the Crusader states?
- Internal divisions and rivalries: The Crusader states were plagued by factionalism among barons, conflicts between Military Orders, and disputes among Italian merchant republics.
- External threats: They faced constant pressure from the Mameluks, Mongols, and resurgent Byzantine Empire, complicating their survival.
- Fragile alliances: Attempts to ally with the Mongols or negotiate truces with Muslim powers were often undermined by mistrust and conflicting interests.
- Declining support from Europe: Western Europe’s waning enthusiasm and distractions reduced the flow of reinforcements and resources.
What were the main military events and turning points in the final century of the Crusader states, according to Steven Runciman?
- Siege and fall of Acre (1291): The final and most significant event, marking the end of Christian rule in the Holy Land after a valiant but doomed defense.
- Fall of Antioch and Tripoli: The loss of these key cities in 1268 and 1289, respectively, dealt devastating blows to the Crusader presence in northern Syria.
- Baibars’ campaigns: The Mameluk Sultan Baibars led relentless campaigns, capturing major fortresses and reducing the Crusader states to a few coastal enclaves.
- Repeated failed Crusades: Multiple attempts to launch new Crusades from Europe failed to reverse the decline or recover lost territories.
How does Steven Runciman describe the role and influence of the Military Orders in A History of the Crusades, Vol. III?
- Backbone of Crusader defense: The Templars, Hospitallers, and Teutonic Knights provided military strength, controlled key fortresses, and supported Crusading expeditions financially.
- Political power and rivalry: The Orders wielded significant political influence, sometimes clashing with kings, local barons, and each other, complicating unified defense efforts.
- Final stands and aftermath: They fought bravely during the last sieges but were ultimately overwhelmed; the Hospitallers relocated to Rhodes, while the Templars were disbanded.
- Legacy: Their wealth, influence, and eventual suppression marked a significant shift in Crusader military organization and medieval society.
What insights does Steven Runciman provide about commerce, trade, and the arts in Outremer in A History of the Crusades, Vol. III?
- Economic reliance on trade: Outremer’s economy depended on the transit trade of Eastern goods, with Italian merchant cities playing a crucial role.
- Limited local resources: The Crusader states were not naturally wealthy and relied on imports for food and luxury goods, often selling customs rights to raise revenue.
- Cultural synthesis in the arts: Crusader architecture and art blended Western, Byzantine, and local influences, with notable achievements in castle and church design.
- Commercial dilemmas: The need for trade with Muslim neighbors often conflicted with religious and military objectives, undermining Crusader unity.
What are the main reasons for the fall of Outremer according to Steven Runciman in A History of the Crusades, Vol. III?
- Military and political fragmentation: Internal divisions, lack of unified leadership, and rivalry among nobles and Military Orders weakened resistance to external threats.
- Economic and diplomatic challenges: Dependence on Italian merchants and conflicting interests between trade and warfare undermined stability and defense.
- Rise of powerful Muslim states: The Mameluks, under effective leaders, systematically dismantled Crusader holdings, while failed alliances with the Mongols left the states isolated.
- Declining Western support: Waning enthusiasm and resources from Europe left the Crusader states unable to sustain prolonged defense.
What are the best quotes from A History of the Crusades, Vol. III by Steven Runciman and what do they mean?
- On the fall of Jerusalem: “‘The kings of the earth, and all the inhabitants of the world, would not have believed that the adversary and the enemy should have entered into the gates of Jerusalem.’ LAMENTATIONS IV, 12” — Captures the shock and disbelief in the West at Jerusalem’s fall in 1187.
- On the Crusades’ nature: “The whole tale is one of faith and folly, courage and greed, hope and disillusion.” — Summarizes the complex human emotions and contradictions of the Crusading era.
- On the Fourth Crusade: “There was never a greater crime against humanity than the Fourth Crusade.” — Strongly condemns the catastrophic impact of the Crusade on Byzantine civilization and Christian unity.
- On Saladin’s character: “He was a devout Moslem... Yet he respected their ways and thought of them as fellowmen... he never broke his word when it was pledged to anyone, whatever his religion.” —
Review Summary
A History of the Crusades, Vol. III is widely praised as a masterful conclusion to Runciman's trilogy. Readers appreciate the comprehensive, well-researched narrative of the Crusades' decline, highlighting missed opportunities and tragic outcomes. Many note the author's balanced perspective and engaging writing style. The book is considered a definitive work on the subject, though some find it occasionally dry or outdated. Readers particularly enjoy the unexpected insights into Mongol history and the thoughtful analysis of the Crusades' long-term impact on East-West relations.
A History of the Crusades Series
Similar Books
About the Author
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
