Key Takeaways
1. Strategic planning often fails to drive effective decisions.
Despite all the time and energy most companies put into strategic planning, the process is most often a barrier to good decision making, our research indicates.
Traditional planning's shortcomings. Many companies invest heavily in strategic planning, yet the process often falls short of its intended purpose. Instead of facilitating effective decision-making, it can become a cumbersome exercise that consumes time and resources without yielding tangible results. This disconnect arises from several factors, including the annual nature of the process, its focus on individual business units, and a lack of clear mechanisms for translating plans into action.
Symptoms of ineffective planning:
- Excessive time commitment
- High-level, abstract discussions
- Disconnection from day-to-day operations
- Limited influence on actual strategy
The need for a new approach. To overcome these limitations, organizations must rethink their approach to strategic planning. They need to move away from rigid, top-down processes and embrace more flexible, iterative approaches that are closely linked to decision-making. This requires a shift in mindset, from viewing planning as an end in itself to seeing it as a means to an end: better, faster, and more effective decisions.
2. Continuous, issues-focused planning is more effective.
As a result, strategic planning doesn’t really influence most companies’ strategy.
A dynamic approach. A more effective approach involves continuous, issues-focused planning. This means identifying the critical issues that the company must address to achieve its strategic goals and then focusing planning efforts on resolving those specific issues. Unlike traditional planning, which is conducted annually and unit by unit, this approach is ongoing and companywide.
Key characteristics:
- Continuous: Strategy is developed and refined throughout the year, not just during a designated planning period.
- Issues-focused: Planning efforts are directed at resolving specific strategic challenges or opportunities.
- Companywide: The process involves multiple business units and functions, fostering collaboration and alignment.
Benefits of continuous planning:
- Greater agility: The company can respond quickly to changing market conditions and emerging opportunities.
- Improved decision-making: Planning efforts are focused on the most critical issues, leading to better-informed decisions.
- Enhanced alignment: The process fosters collaboration and alignment across business units and functions.
3. Link decision-making and planning for better outcomes.
Create a mechanism that helps you identify the decisions you must make to create more shareholder value.
Decision-driven planning. The most effective strategic planning processes are those that are tightly linked to decision-making. This means that the primary goal of planning is to identify the key decisions that the company must make to achieve its strategic objectives. Once those decisions have been identified, the planning process can then be used to develop an implementation roadmap.
A two-step process:
- Identify key decisions: Determine the decisions that are most critical to the company's success.
- Develop implementation plan: Create a detailed plan for executing those decisions.
Boeing's approach. Boeing Commercial Airplanes exemplifies this approach. Executives meet regularly to identify the company's most pressing, long-term strategic issues. Once they have selected a course of action, they update their long-range business plan with an implementation strategy for that decision. By separating—but linking—planning and execution, Boeing makes faster and better decisions.
4. Focus on companywide issues during strategy discussions.
During strategy discussions, focus on issues spanning multiple business units.
Cross-unit collaboration. Strategy discussions should focus on issues that span multiple business units and functions. This encourages collaboration and alignment across the organization, leading to more effective solutions. It also prevents individual units from pursuing strategies that are inconsistent with the overall corporate strategy.
Microsoft's example. Facing a shortage of investment ideas, Microsoft's leaders began defining issues—such as PC market growth and security—that are critical throughout the company. Dialogues between unit leaders and the executive committee now focus on what Microsoft as a whole can do to address each issue—not which strategies individual units should formulate. Countless new growth opportunities have surfaced.
Benefits of a companywide focus:
- Improved alignment: Ensures that all business units are working toward the same goals.
- Enhanced collaboration: Fosters communication and cooperation across functions.
- Greater innovation: Encourages the development of solutions that benefit the entire organization.
5. Develop strategy continuously throughout the year.
Spread strategy reviews throughout the year rather than squeezing them into a two- or three-month window.
Year-round strategy. Instead of confining strategy reviews to a specific time of year, spread them out throughout the year. This allows for a more flexible and responsive approach to planning, enabling the company to address issues as they arise. It also prevents the planning process from becoming a bottleneck that consumes excessive time and resources.
Textron's approach. Executives at multi-industry giant Textron review two to three units' strategy per quarter rather than compressing all unit reviews into one quarter annually. They also hold continuous reviews designed to address each strategic issue on the company's agenda. Once an also-ran among its peers, Textron was a top-quartile performer during 2004–2005.
Advantages of continuous reviews:
- Flexibility: The company can adapt its strategy to changing market conditions.
- Focus: The process allows for a more concentrated effort on individual issues.
- Efficiency: Spreading out the workload reduces the burden on executives.
6. Structure strategy reviews to produce clear results.
Design and conduct strategy sessions so that participants agree on facts related to each issue before proposing solutions.
Fact-based decision-making. Structure strategy reviews to ensure that participants agree on the facts related to each issue before proposing solutions. This helps to avoid unproductive debates based on differing assumptions or interpretations. It also ensures that decisions are grounded in reality, rather than wishful thinking.
Textron's disciplined process. At Textron, each strategic issue is resolved through a disciplined process:
- Agreement on facts: The management committee debates the issue at hand and reaches agreement on the relevant facts.
- Generation of alternatives: The group generates several viable strategy alternatives.
- Evaluation and selection: The committee evaluates the alternatives from a strategic and financial perspective and selects a course of action.
Benefits of a structured approach:
- Improved objectivity: Decisions are based on facts, not opinions.
- Enhanced clarity: Participants have a shared understanding of the issue and the proposed solutions.
- Greater efficiency: The process is more focused and productive.
7. Balance analytical models with human intuition and judgment.
You have to be a quantitative person if you’re managing a company. The quantitative details really matter.
The limits of analytics. While analytical models can be powerful tools for decision-making, they should not be relied on exclusively. Human intuition and judgment are also essential, particularly in situations where data is incomplete or unreliable. It's important to understand the assumptions behind the models and to be aware of their limitations.
Key considerations:
- Model understanding: Managers should not use models they don't understand.
- Assumption clarity: The assumptions underlying the models should be clearly stated.
- Model management: The models should be regularly monitored and updated.
- Human backups: Human decision-makers should be available to override the models when necessary.
The subprime mortgage crisis. The subprime mortgage crisis serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of relying too heavily on analytical models. Many financial institutions used sophisticated models to assess the risk of subprime loans, but these models failed to account for the possibility of a widespread housing market decline. As a result, these institutions suffered massive losses.
8. Multiple perspectives yield better results.
Decisions, like any other business activity, won’t get better without systematic review.
Diverse viewpoints. To make the best decisions, it's essential to consider multiple perspectives. This means involving people from different backgrounds, functions, and levels of the organization in the decision-making process. It also means actively seeking out dissenting opinions and challenging assumptions.
Benefits of diverse perspectives:
- Broader range of options: Different perspectives can lead to the identification of new and innovative solutions.
- Improved analysis: Diverse viewpoints can help to identify potential flaws in the analysis.
- Greater buy-in: Involving more people in the decision-making process can increase their commitment to the outcome.
Systematic review. Decisions, like any other business activity, won't get better without systematic review. If you don't know which of your decisions are most important, you won't be able to prioritize improvements. If you don't know how decisions are made in your company, you can't change the process for making them. If you don't assess the results of your changes, you're unlikely to achieve better decisions.
Last updated:
FAQ
What’s "HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Making Smart Decisions" about?
- Curated HBR Collection: This book is a compilation of the most influential Harvard Business Review articles on decision making, selected to help leaders and managers make better, smarter choices.
- Focus on Decision Quality: It explores the psychological, organizational, and process-related factors that impact decision quality in business settings.
- Practical Tools and Frameworks: The book provides actionable frameworks, checklists, and real-world examples to help readers recognize and overcome common decision-making pitfalls.
- Broad Range of Topics: Articles cover everything from cognitive biases and groupthink to organizational culture, ethical blind spots, and strategic planning.
Why should I read "HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Making Smart Decisions"?
- Improve Decision Outcomes: The book equips readers with tools to avoid common errors and make more effective, reliable decisions.
- Learn from Experts: It features insights from leading thinkers like Daniel Kahneman, Ram Charan, and Thomas H. Davenport.
- Applicable Across Roles: Whether you’re a senior executive or aspiring manager, the lessons are relevant to anyone involved in business decisions.
- Enhance Organizational Performance: By applying the book’s advice, organizations can boost execution, innovation, and competitive advantage.
What are the key takeaways from "HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Making Smart Decisions"?
- Awareness of Biases: Recognizing and mitigating cognitive biases is essential for sound decision making.
- Decision as Process: Effective decisions are the result of robust processes, not isolated events or individual genius.
- Importance of Dialogue: Open, candid, and structured dialogue leads to better group decisions and organizational cultures.
- Role Clarity: Clearly defining who is responsible for each part of a decision (using models like RAPID) prevents bottlenecks and confusion.
What are the most common psychological traps in decision making, according to "The Hidden Traps in Decision Making" by Hammond, Keeney, and Raiffa?
- Anchoring Trap: Over-reliance on the first piece of information received, which skews subsequent judgments.
- Status-Quo Trap: Preference for maintaining current conditions, even when better alternatives exist.
- Sunk-Cost Trap: Continuing a course of action to justify past investments, rather than making rational choices.
- Confirming-Evidence Trap: Seeking out information that supports existing beliefs and ignoring contradictory data.
- Additional Traps: Framing, overconfidence, prudence, and recallability also distort decision making.
How does Daniel Kahneman’s 12-question checklist help reduce bias in team recommendations?
- Systematic Bias Detection: The checklist helps leaders identify self-interest, groupthink, overconfidence, and other biases in team proposals.
- Structured Review Process: It encourages decision makers to challenge assumptions, seek dissenting opinions, and consider credible alternatives.
- Data and Analogy Scrutiny: Questions prompt teams to examine the sources of their data, the relevance of analogies, and the adequacy of information.
- Promotes Outside View: The checklist pushes teams to take an “outside view” and consider scenarios, risks, and competitor responses.
What is the RAPID decision-making model described by Rogers and Blenko, and how does it clarify decision roles?
- Five Key Roles: RAPID stands for Recommend, Agree, Perform, Input, and Decide, each representing a distinct responsibility in the decision process.
- Prevents Bottlenecks: Assigning clear roles ensures decisions don’t stall due to ambiguity or overlapping authority.
- Focuses on Accountability: The “D” (Decide) is the single point of accountability, bringing closure and commitment to action.
- Adaptable Across Organizations: RAPID can be applied to strategic, operational, and cross-functional decisions to improve speed and effectiveness.
How can organizations avoid a culture of indecision, according to Ram Charan’s article?
- Foster Decisive Dialogue: Leaders must model and encourage open, honest, and constructive conversations that surface real issues.
- Design Social Operating Mechanisms: Regular, structured meetings and reviews should be built around candor, informality, and closure.
- Link Feedback and Follow-Through: Performance reviews and feedback must be candid, ongoing, and tied to execution and accountability.
- Address Dialogue Killers: Leaders should watch for and correct behaviors like information hoarding, lack of closure, and silent dissent.
What are the main causes of catastrophic business failures, as discussed in "How to Avoid Catastrophe" by Tinsley, Dillon, and Madsen?
- Ignoring Near Misses: Organizations often overlook small failures or close calls, misinterpreting them as signs of resilience rather than warnings.
- Cognitive Biases: Normalization of deviance and outcome bias blind managers to underlying risks and latent errors.
- Lack of Root Cause Analysis: Focusing on symptoms rather than investigating and correcting root causes allows problems to persist.
- Failure to Reward Reporting: Without incentives to surface near misses, employees may hide issues, increasing the risk of disaster.
What is the difference between advocacy and inquiry in group decision making, as explained by Garvin and Roberto?
- Advocacy: Participants argue for their preferred solutions, often leading to entrenched positions, suppressed dissent, and poor decisions.
- Inquiry: The group collaboratively explores multiple alternatives, encourages critical thinking, and values dissenting views.
- Constructive Conflict: Inquiry promotes cognitive (idea-based) conflict while minimizing affective (personal) conflict.
- Fairness and Closure: Effective inquiry ensures participants feel heard and leads to timely, well-supported decisions.
How does "HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Making Smart Decisions" address ethical blind spots in managerial decision making?
- Unconscious Biases: The book highlights how implicit prejudice, in-group favoritism, overclaiming credit, and conflicts of interest can unconsciously skew decisions.
- Data and Environment: It recommends collecting data to reveal biases and shaping environments to counteract stereotypes.
- Broadened Perspective: Managers are encouraged to use tools like the “veil of ignorance” and to consider counterintuitive options.
- Vigilance Over Intent: Ethical decision making requires ongoing vigilance and self-audit, not just good intentions.
What practical steps does Thomas H. Davenport recommend for improving organizational decision making?
- Identify and Prioritize Decisions: List the most important decisions for strategy execution and business success.
- Inventory Decision Factors: Assess who is involved, what information is available, and how decisions are currently made.
- Intervene and Redesign: Create new roles, processes, and systems to support better decision making, including centers of excellence or decision experts.
- Institutionalize and Review: Provide ongoing tools and training, and regularly assess both outcomes and processes for continuous improvement.
What are the best quotes from "HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Making Smart Decisions" and what do they mean?
- “Forewarned is forearmed.” (Hammond, Keeney, Raiffa): Awareness of psychological traps is the first step to avoiding them in decision making.
- “Leaders get the behavior they tolerate.” (Ram Charan): Organizational culture and decisiveness are shaped by what leaders allow and reinforce.
- “Decisions are the coin of the realm in business.” (Rogers & Blenko): Every business outcome is the result of a decision, making decision quality central to performance.
- “The art of management is the art of making meaningful generalizations out of inadequate facts.” (Dean Stanley Teele, cited by Garvin & Roberto): Managers must often make decisions with incomplete information, balancing analysis with judgment.
- “Only those who understand their own potential for unethical behavior can become the ethical decision makers that they aspire to be.” (Banaji, Bazerman, Chugh): Recognizing one’s own biases is essential for ethical leadership and sound decisions.
Review Summary
HBR's 10 Must Reads on Making Smart Decisions receives mixed reviews, with an average rating of 3.74/5. Readers appreciate its insights on cognitive biases and organizational decision-making, finding it valuable for business leaders. Some criticize its focus on large companies and dated examples. The book's strengths include practical advice on improving decision processes and avoiding common pitfalls. However, some readers feel it lacks personal decision-making strategies and contains irrelevant content. Overall, it's considered a useful resource for organizational decision-makers, despite some limitations.
Similar Books
Download PDF
Download EPUB
.epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
