Searching...
简体中文
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Being Logical

Being Logical

A Guide to Good Thinking
作者 D.Q. McInerny 2004 160 页数
3.75
2.0K 评分
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Unlock listening & more!
Continue

重点摘要

1. 逻辑是清晰思维与有效沟通的基石

逻辑是教育的根本支柱,然而在美国学校中却鲜少被如此重视和教授。

推理的基础。 逻辑为我们分析信息、得出有效结论以及清晰表达思想提供了框架。它帮助我们区分合理与不合理的论证,从而在生活各方面做出更明智的决策。

实际应用。 逻辑思维能力在以下领域尤为重要:

  • 学术研究
  • 职业发展
  • 人际关系
  • 媒体与政治信息的评估
  • 日常问题的解决

通过培养逻辑推理能力,我们不仅能更明智地甄别信息,也能更有说服力地表达自己的观点。

2. 通过直接观察或可靠的间接证据确立事实

要确定某一事实的真实性,最直接的方法就是亲自去观察。

直接观察。 尽可能通过亲身体验来验证事实。利用感官收集周围世界的信息,这是知识最可靠的基础。

可靠的间接证据。 当无法直接观察时,应:

  • 咨询可信的目击者
  • 查阅官方文件和记录
  • 分析物理证据
  • 考察照片或视频资料

对传闻、未经证实的主张及有偏见的信息源保持警惕,始终评估信息来源的可信度及其潜在动机。

3. 思想与语言必须准确反映客观现实

只有不断核对思想所指涉的客观事实,我们的观念和理解才会清晰。

思想作为心理表征。 我们的思维应尽可能贴近其所代表的外部世界。定期将观念与可观察的现实对照,确保其准确性。

精准的语言。 选择能够清晰、具体传达思想的词汇,避免:

  • 含糊不清或模棱两可的表达
  • 面向大众时使用行话
  • 情绪化语言掩盖真实含义

努力使思想、语言与所描述的客观事实紧密相连,这种精准是有效沟通和合理推理的基础。

4. 有效论证需建立在真实前提与有效结构之上

若论证所包含的所有陈述均为真实,则该论证在内容上是可靠的。

真实前提。 论证的出发点必须事实准确。使用前应核实所有主张的真实性。

有效结构。 论证的逻辑形式必须严密。常见有效结构包括:

  • 三段论
  • 肯定前件(如果A,则B;A为真;因此B为真)
  • 否定后件(如果A,则B;B为假;因此A为假)

真实前提加上有效结构,能保证结论的真实性。但需注意,偶尔也可能因巧合而从错误推理中得出真实结论。

5. 归纳推理是科学探究的基础

整个科学事业正是建立在归纳推理之上的。

模式识别。 归纳推理通过观察具体实例,归纳出一般规律。科学家利用此方法来:

  • 提出假设
  • 设计实验
  • 分析数据
  • 构建理论

概率性结论。 与演绎推理不同,归纳推理得出的结论是概率性的,而非绝对确定。其强度取决于:

  • 观察次数
  • 样本的代表性
  • 是否存在矛盾证据

尽管无法提供绝对确定性,强有力的归纳推理使我们能够做出可靠预测,推动对世界的理解。

6. 避免导致非理性结论的常见谬误

谬误推理往往极具说服力,有时甚至胜过合理推理,这正是其危险所在。

形式谬误。 这些错误源于论证结构的缺陷:

  • 肯定后件谬误
  • 否定前件谬误
  • 中项未分配谬误

非形式谬误。 这些错误涉及论证内容:

  • 人身攻击
  • 循环论证
  • 错误二分法
  • 滑坡谬误

熟悉常见谬误,有助于识别他人论证中的错误,避免自身推理陷入误区。尤其警惕那些情感化的谬误,它们往往绕过理性思考。

7. 怀疑与情感既助益亦阻碍逻辑思维

怀疑在合理推理中有其位置,但应有选择地运用。

平衡的怀疑态度。 对非凡主张保持健康的怀疑,同时对新证据保持开放。避免:

  • 极端怀疑,否定一切知识
  • 轻信所有主张

情感意识。 认识情感在思维中的作用:

  • 将情感视为有价值的信息来源
  • 警惕强烈情绪影响判断
  • 力求客观评估论证

培养理性与情感的协调运用,懂得何时依赖何者,以实现最佳决策。

8. 专家意见应被评估,而非盲目接受

评判标准不在于人们如何谈论所知,而在于他们如何通过论证展示所知。

专家资格标准。 评估专家意见时,应考察:

  • 相关资质与经验
  • 准确预测或见解的记录
  • 清晰解释推理的能力
  • 潜在利益冲突

超越权威诉求。 不因专家身份而盲从,应寻找:

  • 支持性证据
  • 合理论证
  • 多位领域专家的共识

即便是真正的专家也可能出错或存在偏见,评估任何主张时都应保持批判性思维。

9. 传统与大众观点不足以构成充分理由

“事情一直如此”本身并非继续如此的有力理由。

基于价值评估实践。 评判传统方法应看其当前效果,而非历史悠久。考虑:

  • 环境变化
  • 新信息或技术
  • 伦理影响

质疑多数意见。 大众观点可能错误,应独立分析主张:

  • 寻找支持证据
  • 考虑不同视角
  • 若理由充分,勇于持有非主流立场

传统与共识虽有参考价值,但不应成为决策的唯一依据。应在尊重历史的同时,保持对积极变革的开放态度。

10. 关注论点本身,而非攻击论者

论辩中应回应论点,而非论点背后的人。

区分观点与个人。 根据论证的逻辑价值评判,而非论者的品格或背景。避免:

  • 人身攻击
  • 起源谬误(因来源而否定观点)
  • 污蔑先入为主(预先贬低信息源)

建设性对话。 参与辩论时应:

  • 以最强形式呈现对方观点(钢人辩护)
  • 寻求共同立场
  • 承认对方合理之处

聚焦思想而非个性,有助于营造有益的智识交流环境,推动真理的追求。

最后更新日期:

Want to read the full book?

FAQ

What's "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking" about?

  • Introduction to Logic: The book serves as an introduction to the principles of logic, aiming to teach readers how to think clearly and effectively.
  • Science and Art of Logic: It presents logic as both a science and an art, emphasizing the importance of logical thinking in education and everyday life.
  • Practical Guide: The author, D.Q. McInerny, focuses on making logic accessible to beginners, aiming to produce practitioners rather than theoreticians.
  • Structure: The book is divided into five parts, each building on the previous, covering topics from preparing the mind for logic to identifying and avoiding fallacies.

Why should I read "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Enhance Critical Thinking: The book provides tools to improve your reasoning skills, which are essential in both personal and professional settings.
  • Clear Communication: It emphasizes the importance of matching words to ideas, helping you communicate more effectively.
  • Avoiding Fallacies: By understanding common logical fallacies, you can avoid errors in reasoning and make more persuasive arguments.
  • Educational Gap: The author argues that logic is a missing piece in the American educational system, making this book a valuable resource for self-education.

What are the key takeaways of "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Attention to Detail: Being attentive and getting the facts straight are foundational to logical thinking.
  • Principles of Logic: Understanding the basic principles, such as the principle of contradiction and sufficient reason, is crucial.
  • Argument Construction: The book provides a framework for constructing sound arguments, emphasizing the importance of valid premises and conclusions.
  • Fallacies: Recognizing and avoiding common fallacies, such as equivocation and the ad hominem fallacy, is essential for logical reasoning.

What are the best quotes from "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking" and what do they mean?

  • "Logic is about clear and effective thinking." This quote encapsulates the book's primary focus on improving clarity and effectiveness in reasoning.
  • "We may take Fancy for a companion, but must follow Reason as our guide." This quote, from Dr. Samuel Johnson, highlights the importance of reason over imagination in logical thinking.
  • "The whole purpose of reasoning, of logic, is to arrive at the truth of things." It underscores the ultimate goal of logic: to discern truth from falsehood.
  • "Common sense is that homey everyday-type reasoning which is born out of an alert awareness of, and respect for, the obvious." This emphasizes the value of common sense as a foundation for logical thinking.

How does D.Q. McInerny define logic in "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Clear and Effective Thinking: Logic is defined as the science and art of clear and effective thinking.
  • Foundation of Education: McInerny views logic as the backbone of true education, essential for understanding all other subjects.
  • Practical Application: The book aims to make logic practical and accessible, focusing on real-world application rather than theoretical abstraction.
  • Truth-Seeking: Logic is fundamentally about seeking truth and distinguishing it from falsehood.

What are the basic principles of logic according to "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Principle of Identity: A thing is what it is, emphasizing the distinctness of individual entities.
  • Principle of Excluded Middle: There is no middle state between being and non-being; something either exists or it does not.
  • Principle of Sufficient Reason: Everything has a cause or explanation for its existence.
  • Principle of Contradiction: It is impossible for something to both be and not be at the same time and in the same respect.

How does "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking" suggest constructing a sound argument?

  • Premises and Conclusion: An argument must have true premises that logically support the conclusion.
  • Relevancy of Premises: Premises should be directly relevant to the conclusion, providing strong support.
  • Avoiding Fallacies: Ensure the argument is free from logical fallacies that could undermine its validity.
  • Audience Consideration: Tailor the argument to the audience, using language and examples that resonate with them.

What are some common fallacies discussed in "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Equivocation: Using a word with multiple meanings to mislead or confuse.
  • Ad Hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.
  • Straw-Man Fallacy: Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.
  • Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: Assuming that because one event follows another, the first event caused the second.

How does "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking" address the relationship between logic and language?

  • Inseparable Connection: Logic and language are inseparable; clear thinking requires precise language.
  • Matching Words to Ideas: Effective communication depends on accurately matching words to the ideas they represent.
  • Avoiding Ambiguity: The book advises avoiding vague and ambiguous language to ensure clarity.
  • Language as a Tool: Language should reveal truth, not conceal it, emphasizing the importance of honest communication.

What role does common sense play in "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Foundation of Logic: Common sense is the basis of logical thinking, rooted in an awareness of the obvious.
  • Everyday Reasoning: It represents everyday reasoning that distinguishes between clear and unclear ideas.
  • Suspicion of Complexity: Common sense is wary of overly complex language that obscures meaning.
  • Respect for Basics: It respects basic principles and first principles of reason, guiding logical thought.

How does "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking" suggest dealing with illogical thinking?

  • Identify Fallacies: Recognize common fallacies that lead to illogical thinking.
  • Avoid Emotional Appeals: Keep emotions in check to maintain clarity and objectivity in reasoning.
  • Challenge Assumptions: Question assumptions and ensure they are based on evidence.
  • Practice Logical Thinking: Regularly apply logical principles to real-life situations to strengthen reasoning skills.

What is the significance of the "Principle of Contradiction" in "Being Logical: A Guide to Good Thinking"?

  • Avoiding Falsehood: The principle helps avoid falsehood by ensuring statements do not contradict objective facts.
  • Foundation of Logic: It is a foundational principle that underpins logical reasoning and argumentation.
  • Self-Evident Truth: The principle is self-evident, meaning it is immediately recognized as true upon understanding.
  • Guiding Thought: It guides logical thought by ensuring consistency and coherence in reasoning.

评论

3.75 满分 5
平均评分来自 2.0K 来自Goodreads和亚马逊的评分.

《逻辑思维》因其清晰简明地介绍逻辑与批判性思维而广受好评。读者赞赏其简洁实用,认为对日常推理大有裨益。也有评论指出内容对高级学习者而言过于基础。书中涵盖了逻辑原则、论证构建及常见谬误。许多读者推荐它作为入门指南或逻辑复习课程。尽管部分解释略显浅显,但大多数人认为它是提升分析能力与理性思考的宝贵资源。

Your rating:
4.33
123 评分

关于作者

丹尼斯·“D.Q.”·麦克纳尼是一位学术哲学家,拥有卓越的学术生涯。他拥有两个博士学位,曾在布拉德利大学、圣托马斯学院和圣母大学等多所院校任教。1994年,麦克纳尼加入了圣彼得司铎兄弟会的瓜达卢佩圣母神学院教职。他深厚的哲学背景和丰富的教学经验,塑造了他对逻辑与批判性思维的独特见解。麦克纳尼的著作《逻辑思维》体现了他致力于让哲学概念为更广泛读者所理解的努力。他是已故著名哲学家兼作家拉尔夫·麦克纳尼的弟弟。

Listen
Now playing
Being Logical
0:00
-0:00
Now playing
Being Logical
0:00
-0:00
1x
Voice
Speed
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Queue
Home
Swipe
Library
Get App
Create a free account to unlock:
Recommendations: Personalized for you
Requests: Request new book summaries
Bookmarks: Save your favorite books
History: Revisit books later
Ratings: Rate books & see your ratings
200,000+ readers
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Listen, bookmark, and more
Compare Features Free Pro
📖 Read Summaries
Read unlimited summaries. Free users get 3 per month
🎧 Listen to Summaries
Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 4
📜 Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 4
📥 Unlimited Downloads
Free users are limited to 1
Risk-Free Timeline
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Aug 12,
cancel anytime before.
Consume 2.8x More Books
2.8x more books Listening Reading
Our users love us
200,000+ readers
"...I can 10x the number of books I can read..."
"...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented..."
"...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision..."
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/year
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Start a 7-Day Free Trial
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Scanner
Find a barcode to scan

Settings
General
Widget
Loading...