Facebook Pixel
Searching...
English
EnglishEnglish
EspañolSpanish
简体中文Chinese
FrançaisFrench
DeutschGerman
日本語Japanese
PortuguêsPortuguese
ItalianoItalian
한국어Korean
РусскийRussian
NederlandsDutch
العربيةArabic
PolskiPolish
हिन्दीHindi
Tiếng ViệtVietnamese
SvenskaSwedish
ΕλληνικάGreek
TürkçeTurkish
ไทยThai
ČeštinaCzech
RomânăRomanian
MagyarHungarian
УкраїнськаUkrainian
Bahasa IndonesiaIndonesian
DanskDanish
SuomiFinnish
БългарскиBulgarian
עבריתHebrew
NorskNorwegian
HrvatskiCroatian
CatalàCatalan
SlovenčinaSlovak
LietuviųLithuanian
SlovenščinaSlovenian
СрпскиSerbian
EestiEstonian
LatviešuLatvian
فارسیPersian
മലയാളംMalayalam
தமிழ்Tamil
اردوUrdu
Good Calories, Bad Calories

Good Calories, Bad Calories

Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease
by Gary Taubes 2004 601 pages
4.17
9k+ ratings
Listen
Listen

Key Takeaways

1. The conventional wisdom on diet and health is based on flawed science

"If sciences are based on supposition and opinion…the object is to command assent, not to master the thing itself."

Flawed foundations: The dietary guidelines that have shaped public health policy for decades are built on shaky scientific ground. The diet-heart hypothesis, which proposes that dietary fat causes heart disease, gained traction despite inconsistent evidence. Ancel Keys, the hypothesis's main proponent, selectively chose data that supported his theory while ignoring contradictory findings.

Oversimplification and bias: The nutrition research community often oversimplified complex issues, leading to misinterpretations and erroneous conclusions. This was compounded by confirmation bias, where researchers tended to see what they expected to see, rather than objectively evaluating all available evidence. The result was a self-reinforcing cycle of flawed studies and misguided public health recommendations.

2. Dietary fat was wrongly vilified, while refined carbohydrates were overlooked

"To attribute obesity to 'overeating,' as the Harvard nutritionist Jean Mayer suggested back in 1968, 'is as meaningful as to account for alcoholism by ascribing it to 'overdrinking.'"

Fat phobia: The demonization of dietary fat, particularly saturated fat, led to widespread adoption of low-fat diets. This shift was based more on correlation than causation, and ignored the potential benefits of certain fats in the diet. The American Heart Association and other influential organizations promoted low-fat diets without sufficient evidence of their long-term safety or efficacy.

Carbohydrate blindspot: While fat was vilified, the potential negative effects of refined carbohydrates and sugar were largely ignored. This oversight may have contributed to the rise in obesity and related chronic diseases, as people replaced fat in their diets with these easily digestible carbohydrates.

3. The rise of obesity and chronic diseases coincides with low-fat diet recommendations

"The circumstances militated against any acquisition of new dietetic habits."

Unintended consequences: As low-fat diet recommendations became widespread, rates of obesity and related chronic diseases began to increase. This paradoxical outcome suggests that the conventional wisdom on nutrition may have been misguided.

Nutritional transition: The shift towards low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets coincided with:

  • Increased consumption of refined grains and sugars
  • Development of processed low-fat foods high in added sugars
  • Decreased consumption of whole foods and natural fats

These changes may have contributed to metabolic disturbances and weight gain in populations following the new dietary guidelines.

4. Insulin plays a crucial role in weight regulation and chronic disease development

"Insulin (in a test tube) will monopolize the attention of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), which normally degrades and clears both amyloid proteins and insulin from around the neurons."

Insulin's multifaceted role: Insulin is not just a blood sugar regulator; it's a master hormone that influences:

  • Fat storage and mobilization
  • Appetite regulation
  • Cellular energy metabolism
  • Inflammation and oxidative stress

Chronic hyperinsulinemia: Consistently elevated insulin levels, often caused by diets high in refined carbohydrates, may contribute to:

  • Insulin resistance
  • Obesity
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Potentially even neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's

Understanding insulin's central role in metabolism challenges the simplistic "calories in, calories out" model of weight regulation and disease development.

5. The carbohydrate hypothesis offers a better explanation for obesity and related diseases

"The carbohydrate hypothesis rests upon two simple propositions."

Alternative framework: The carbohydrate hypothesis proposes that refined carbohydrates and sugars, rather than dietary fat, are the primary drivers of obesity and related chronic diseases. This hypothesis better explains the observed patterns of disease in populations transitioning to Western diets.

Key principles:

  1. If a disease becomes more common with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, insulin and blood sugar likely play a role
  2. If insulin and blood sugar are involved, refined carbohydrates in the diet may be a contributing factor

This framework provides a more comprehensive explanation for the diseases of civilization and offers potential avenues for prevention and treatment.

6. The thrifty gene theory fails to explain the obesity epidemic

"Species adapt to their environment over successive generations. Those that don't, die off. When food is abundant, species multiply; they don't get obese and diabetic."

Flawed assumptions: The thrifty gene theory proposes that humans evolved to efficiently store fat during times of plenty to survive periods of famine. However, this theory:

  • Lacks strong evolutionary evidence
  • Doesn't explain why obesity affects some populations more than others
  • Fails to account for the rapid rise in obesity rates over recent decades

Alternative explanations: Rather than a genetic predisposition to store fat, the obesity epidemic may be better explained by:

  • Changes in dietary composition, particularly increased refined carbohydrate consumption
  • Hormonal and metabolic disruptions caused by modern processed foods
  • Environmental factors that influence appetite and metabolism

7. Exercise alone is not an effective solution for weight loss

"For a long period the role of exercise in weight control was disregarded, if not actually ridiculed."

Limited impact: While exercise has numerous health benefits, its effectiveness for weight loss is often overstated. Research shows that:

  • The calories burned through exercise are easily offset by small increases in food intake
  • Increased physical activity often leads to increased appetite
  • The body tends to compensate for increased energy expenditure by reducing metabolism

Complex relationship: The association between physical activity and weight is not straightforward:

  • Obesity may lead to decreased activity, rather than the other way around
  • Both obesity and inactivity may be symptoms of the same underlying metabolic disturbances
  • Poverty is associated with higher obesity rates, despite often involving more physical labor

8. Hunger and metabolism adapt to defend against weight loss

"Keys's conscientious objectors reduced their total energy expenditure by over half in response to a diet that gave them only half as many calories as they would have preferred."

Metabolic adaptation: When calorie intake is restricted, the body responds by:

  • Reducing basal metabolic rate
  • Decreasing non-exercise activity thermogenesis
  • Increasing hunger and food-seeking behaviors

Persistent effects: These adaptations can persist long after the period of calorie restriction, making it difficult to maintain weight loss. This explains why:

  • Most dieters regain lost weight
  • Successive dieting attempts often become less effective
  • Maintaining a reduced weight requires ongoing calorie restriction or significant lifestyle changes

9. Sugar and refined carbohydrates may be the primary culprits in chronic diseases

"Fructose is significantly more reactive in the bloodstream than glucose, and perhaps ten times more effective than glucose at inducing the cross-linking of proteins that leads to the cellular junk of advanced glycation end-products."

Unique metabolic effects: Sugar, particularly fructose, has distinct metabolic effects that may contribute to chronic disease:

  • Rapid absorption and metabolism in the liver
  • Increased production of triglycerides and uric acid
  • Greater potential for glycation and oxidative stress

Hidden dangers: The widespread addition of sugar and refined carbohydrates to processed foods may be driving the rise in chronic diseases:

  • Increased insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia
  • Promotion of inflammation and oxidative stress
  • Disruption of normal appetite regulation

10. The diseases of civilization emerge with the introduction of Western diets

"As incomes rise and populations become more urban, diets high in complex carbohydrates give way to more varied diets with a higher proportion of fats, saturated fats and sugars."

Consistent pattern: Across diverse populations, the introduction of Western dietary patterns is associated with increased rates of:

  • Obesity
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Certain cancers
  • Dental caries and other chronic conditions

Key dietary changes:

  • Increased consumption of refined grains, sugar, and processed foods
  • Decreased intake of whole, unprocessed foods
  • Shift from traditional, varied diets to more homogeneous, energy-dense diets

This consistent pattern suggests that the Western diet, rather than genetic factors or total calorie intake, may be the primary driver of these chronic diseases.

Last updated:

FAQ

What's Good Calories, Bad Calories about?

  • Challenging Dietary Myths: The book investigates the long-standing beliefs about dietary fat, carbohydrates, and their roles in obesity and chronic diseases, challenging the notion that dietary fat is harmful.
  • Historical Overview: Gary Taubes provides a historical context of dietary recommendations, tracing the evolution of the fat-cholesterol and carbohydrate hypotheses.
  • Scientific Critique: Taubes critically analyzes scientific studies that have influenced dietary guidelines, arguing for a reevaluation of the evidence surrounding diet and health.

Why should I read Good Calories, Bad Calories?

  • Questioning Conventional Wisdom: The book offers a fresh perspective that challenges widely accepted dietary guidelines, encouraging critical thinking about nutrition and health.
  • In-depth Research: Taubes meticulously reviews historical and contemporary research, providing a comprehensive understanding of diet and disease complexities.
  • Practical Health Implications: Insights from the book can influence personal health choices, particularly regarding carbohydrate and fat consumption.

What are the key takeaways of Good Calories, Bad Calories?

  • Quality Over Quantity: Taubes argues that the quality of calories, particularly refined carbohydrates, is more important than the quantity in contributing to obesity and diseases.
  • Insulin's Role: The book highlights insulin's role in fat storage and metabolism, challenging the notion that reducing calories alone leads to weight loss.
  • Historical Dietary Patterns: Taubes advocates for a return to traditional diets lower in refined carbohydrates, which were associated with better health outcomes.

What are the best quotes from Good Calories, Bad Calories and what do they mean?

  • “To attribute obesity to ‘overeating’... is as meaningful as to account for alcoholism by ascribing it to ‘overdrinking.’”: This emphasizes the complexity of obesity, highlighting biological and hormonal factors beyond mere overeating.
  • “The great progress in dietary control of obesity... was the recognition that meat... was not fat producing.”: This counters the low-fat diet narrative, suggesting that dietary fat, especially from animal sources, does not necessarily lead to obesity.
  • “There is always an easy solution to every human problem... neat, plausible, and wrong.”: Taubes warns against oversimplified solutions in nutrition, advocating for a nuanced understanding of diet and health.

How does Good Calories, Bad Calories critique modern dietary guidelines?

  • Historical Context: Taubes examines how dietary guidelines evolved, often based on the fat-cholesterol hypothesis without sufficient scientific backing.
  • Lack of Scientific Rigor: The book critiques the lack of rigorous evidence supporting low-fat recommendations, highlighting misinterpretations in studies.
  • Call for Reevaluation: Taubes advocates for a focus on calorie quality rather than quantity, urging a return to traditional dietary patterns.

What is the carbohydrate hypothesis in Good Calories, Bad Calories?

  • Refined Carbohydrates as Culprits: Taubes posits that refined carbohydrates, particularly sugars, are primary drivers of obesity and chronic diseases.
  • Insulin Resistance: High carbohydrate intake leads to elevated insulin levels, causing insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.
  • Historical Evidence: The book supports this hypothesis with historical data linking carbohydrate consumption to health issues.

How does Good Calories, Bad Calories address obesity?

  • Mythology of Obesity: Taubes challenges the view that obesity is simply due to overeating and lack of exercise, emphasizing hormonal responses, particularly insulin.
  • Dietary Recommendations: The book suggests low-carbohydrate diets may be more effective for weight loss and health than low-fat diets.
  • Historical Evidence: Taubes provides examples of populations thriving on low-carbohydrate diets, suggesting modern practices contribute to obesity.

What role does insulin play in Good Calories, Bad Calories?

  • Insulin's Function: Insulin regulates blood sugar and fat storage; high carbohydrate intake leads to elevated insulin, promoting fat storage.
  • Insulin Resistance: Chronic high insulin levels can lead to insulin resistance, linked to obesity and metabolic disorders.
  • Dietary Implications: Taubes advocates for low-carbohydrate diets to manage insulin levels effectively, suggesting this is key to weight management.

How does Good Calories, Bad Calories explain the failure of traditional weight-loss diets?

  • Hunger and Metabolism: Traditional diets often increase hunger and decrease metabolism, making weight loss difficult to maintain.
  • Psychological Factors: Dieting can lead to a cycle of weight loss and regain due to hunger and cravings.
  • Ineffectiveness of Caloric Restriction: Taubes argues that caloric restriction doesn't address metabolic and hormonal factors driving weight gain.

What evidence does Taubes provide against low-fat diets in Good Calories, Bad Calories?

  • Historical Studies: The book references studies showing low-fat diets haven't reduced obesity or heart disease rates as expected.
  • Increased Carbohydrate Consumption: Low-fat diets often lead to higher carbohydrate intake, contributing to weight gain and metabolic issues.
  • Critique of Clinical Trials: Taubes discusses methodological flaws in trials supporting low-fat diets, leading to misleading conclusions.

How does Good Calories, Bad Calories relate to modern dietary practices?

  • Critique of Current Guidelines: Taubes critiques low-fat dietary guidelines, suggesting they contribute to obesity and chronic diseases.
  • Support for Ketogenic Diets: The book aligns with ketogenic diets, focusing on high fat and low carbohydrate intake for weight loss and health.
  • Call for Reevaluation: Taubes urges a shift from calorie counting to understanding macronutrient effects on the body.

What are the implications of Good Calories, Bad Calories for public health?

  • Need for New Guidelines: Taubes suggests revising public health guidelines to reflect evidence linking carbohydrates to obesity and diseases.
  • Focus on Education: The book emphasizes educating the public on calorie types and their health effects.
  • Encouragement of Whole Foods: Taubes advocates for prioritizing whole, unprocessed foods over refined carbohydrates and sugars.

Review Summary

4.17 out of 5
Average of 9k+ ratings from Goodreads and Amazon.

Good Calories, Bad Calories challenges conventional wisdom on diet and health, arguing that refined carbohydrates, not fats, are the primary cause of obesity and chronic diseases. Taubes presents extensive research to support his claims, criticizing low-fat diets and the calories-in-calories-out model of weight management. While some readers find the book dense and technical, many praise its thoroughness and consider it revolutionary. Critics argue that Taubes may be biased in his interpretation of evidence. Overall, the book is viewed as thought-provoking and potentially paradigm-shifting in the field of nutrition.

Your rating:

About the Author

Gary Taubes is an American science writer known for challenging conventional wisdom in nutrition and health. With degrees in applied physics, aerospace engineering, and journalism, Taubes has written for various science magazines and authored several books on scientific controversies. His work on diet and nutrition, particularly "Good Calories, Bad Calories," has gained significant attention for questioning established dietary guidelines. Taubes' main hypothesis focuses on the role of carbohydrates and insulin in fat storage. His background in physics and journalism has influenced his approach to investigating and reporting on complex scientific issues, making him a prominent figure in the ongoing debate about diet and health.

Other books by Gary Taubes

Download PDF

To save this Good Calories, Bad Calories summary for later, download the free PDF. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
Download PDF
File size: 0.31 MB     Pages: 12

Download EPUB

To read this Good Calories, Bad Calories summary on your e-reader device or app, download the free EPUB. The .epub digital book format is ideal for reading ebooks on phones, tablets, and e-readers.
Download EPUB
File size: 3.01 MB     Pages: 10
0:00
-0:00
1x
Dan
Andrew
Michelle
Lauren
Select Speed
1.0×
+
200 words per minute
Create a free account to unlock:
Requests: Request new book summaries
Bookmarks: Save your favorite books
History: Revisit books later
Ratings: Rate books & see your ratings
Try Full Access for 7 Days
Listen, bookmark, and more
Compare Features Free Pro
📖 Read Summaries
All summaries are free to read in 40 languages
🎧 Listen to Summaries
Listen to unlimited summaries in 40 languages
❤️ Unlimited Bookmarks
Free users are limited to 10
📜 Unlimited History
Free users are limited to 10
Risk-Free Timeline
Today: Get Instant Access
Listen to full summaries of 73,530 books. That's 12,000+ hours of audio!
Day 4: Trial Reminder
We'll send you a notification that your trial is ending soon.
Day 7: Your subscription begins
You'll be charged on Mar 1,
cancel anytime before.
Consume 2.8x More Books
2.8x more books Listening Reading
Our users love us
50,000+ readers
"...I can 10x the number of books I can read..."
"...exceptionally accurate, engaging, and beautifully presented..."
"...better than any amazon review when I'm making a book-buying decision..."
Save 62%
Yearly
$119.88 $44.99/year
$3.75/mo
Monthly
$9.99/mo
Try Free & Unlock
7 days free, then $44.99/year. Cancel anytime.
Settings
Appearance
Black Friday Sale 🎉
$20 off Lifetime Access
$79.99 $59.99
Upgrade Now →